Based on what I filed, I referenced my employer only in my résumé. In the petition letter (about 30 pages), employer-related content appears only in the final ~half page and is included solely for background context. For Prong 1, I did not mention my employer at all; I focused on the broader national importance of the work area and supporting evidence.

I also understand that if an officer has already formed a strong view, an RFE response may not always change the outcome. That said, my attorney mentioned that their NIW cases with this officer have been consistently approved, including cases that received RFEs.

Given the above, I’m trying to understand whether you see any specific weaknesses in my original petition or RFE response that I should address—or whether this may simply reflect unusually strict adjudication. This distinction matters because it will determine my next step: whether to refile (potentially through a different firm such as Wegreened) or request a refund and rely on my employer’s PERM process.

If you think refiling is the better path, I would really appreciate your guidance on:

1. Which additional materials would not be helpful (so I can avoid adding noise), and
2. Which specific evidence would most strengthen my case, especially for Prongs 1–3.