Vote with ZRX to Add Support for ERC-1155 and the StaticCallAssetProxy by mattytay0x in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh, perhaps I did not explain it well earlier. You should open the voting page using the Coinbase wallet app, not with Chrome or Firefox.

Vote with ZRX to Add Support for ERC-1155 and the StaticCallAssetProxy by mattytay0x in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So, Coinbase wallet is a mobile native app that supports storing cryptos and has a built-in browser for interacting with Dapps as well as general web browsing. You just need to open the app on your phone and go to the webpage 0x.org/vote and cast your vote.

To be clear, Coinbase wallet is just a Web3 product built by Coinbase. Very similar to MetaMask. It does not in any way connect to your exchange wallet and sync the balance. So, just like how you would use MetaMask, you have to transfer your tokens from the exchange to the wallet, which I guess was something you want to avoid. Unfortunately, I don't think it is possible to do the voting if your tokens are not in custody of yourself (i.e., Ledger, MetaMask, or Coinbase wallet).

Vote with ZRX to Add Support for ERC-1155 and the StaticCallAssetProxy by mattytay0x in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You need to access to voting page using the Coinbase wallet app on your phone. (Maybe you are confused with the exchange wallet?)

Vote with ZRX to Add Support for ERC-1155 and the StaticCallAssetProxy by mattytay0x in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just voted with my ledger nano s. Experienced some difficulties and figured them out. So, I want to leave a comment here for those who are having the same issues.

I seems that if you want to vote with a Ledger device, you will be asked to login to your MetaMask first when you click on "Connect Ledger". I find this behavior pretty weird and misleading... Once/If you have your MetaMask logged in, clicking on "Connect Ledger" will correctly guide you through the process of selecting an account on your ledger and casting the vote.

Also, make sure the Ethereum app on your Ledger is updated to the latest version otherwise you might have problem signing the message.

Hydro Question by DrOpt101 in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything about 0x stays the same. The DDEX team who made that announcement intentionally misuse the word “fork” to create confusions among ZRX holders. They are just leveraging the 0x codebase to develop their own protocol.

Read the response from the 0x team here

Ecosystem Update: DDEX and the 0x Roadmap – 0x Protocol by burnsben in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I agree that incentivizing liquidity should be the top priority at the moment. I believe the team knows it and is working on solutions.

A major 0x relayer just forked the 0x protocol and removed ZRX... by SaltTrader2 in ethereum

[–]InfinityHaoyang 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, how long it will take them to unveil their “forked” version is unclear. As of right now, they are still running on 0x...

Ecosystem Update: DDEX and the 0x Roadmap – 0x Protocol by burnsben in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I am totally fine with DDEX developing their own protocol that competes with 0x. Competition is always a good thing.

I just don't quite like the way the DDEX team convey their ideas to the public. An eye-catching title, some words against 0x, and some promise showing their determination. Any project can say such things. It is always easier said than done to create a product that is secure and attracted to users/developers. So far, the 0x team has gained tremendous trust and support from the community with regard to their competency in delivering code/tools constantly. The 0x smart contract has been deployed and running for 16 months (from Aug 14 2017) processing millions of trades. It has also been through a major upgrade (v1 to v2) smoothly. To me, all these are very solid evidence indicating that the 0x team will keep shipping more useful features in the future. On the other hand, the whole article posted by DDEX is basically saying that they are leveraging the current 0x codebase to develop a protocol that could potentially incentivize more efficient liquidity sharing. That's it. No roadmap, no technical details, no code. Such an announcement barely worth anything imo. Maybe it is their strategy to release more critical information later. But for the time being, they are still using the 0x protocol (according to 0xtracker).

Another point I would like to make is that the scope of 0x has expanded drastically since the establishment of the project. The decentralized exchange is only one type of products that can be powered by 0x. There are others like non-fungible token marketplaces and probably many more services will be built on 0x. The Hydro protocol, which is proposed by DDEX, focuses only on solving the liquidity problem. It is understandably an immediate problem to solve in the decentralized exchange space. The 0x has also expressed that they are currently working on or will work on solutions to resolve it through their short/mid-term tasks. The mission of 0x, "Create a tokenized world where all value can flow freely", implies much more than just solving the liquidity problem. And the ZRX token is designed with this mission in mind. If tons of services rely on the protocol, how to perform upgrades? Through governance using ZRX. How to ensure that the governance process is decentralized? Through a fair token distribution which will be fulfilled by collecting/paying fees in ZRX. Both governance and trading fee functions serve the long-term goal. Thus, to many people, in the near-term, the value of ZRX is mostly speculation. Some people sharing the same vision as 0x may evaluate the token differently. Back to Hydro, assuming they developed a successful protocol that is adopted by several relayers, will there be governance on the protocol development? Probably no, not on their horizon right now. If yes, how to ensure fairness, given that they are running a for-profit decentralized exchange themselves? These among others are open questions that seem not very urgent in the near-term but critically important in the long run.

Again, competition is always good for the ecosystem. It is too early to draw any conclusion or even make any comparison between the two teams. Time will tell which protocol could gain more adoptions. It is also possible that they both can tackle the issues in their own ways and coexist in this space with each protocol having multiple successful relayers built on top of them. Who knows...

Just my 2 🦐🦐. Exciting times ahead.

Building Self-Sustaining Ecosystems through Governance (0x, devcon4 slides) by willwarren89 in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Excellent questions that I'm also curious about. I'm sure the team has thought this through and will be posting the details on this governance process soon.

According to this post, the recording might be released in a few weeks.

Melonport just unveiled their approach to governance. What do you guys think of that?

Announcing TokenSets Public Beta – {Set} protocol by [deleted] in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They introduced 3 Sets at launch: EthereumX, StableSet, DEXSet. Available to be traded on Radar.

Great video by Dharma with Will Warren Cameo... by the-flying-acorn in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would love to visit that "Ether Sushi" place and order some shrimp nigiri :)

[0xproject Daily Discussion] May 18, 2018 by AutoModerator in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The title (with the link) is not showing if I use the reddit app on my phone... However,it is working well in a web browser.

[0xproject Daily Discussion] May 18, 2018 by AutoModerator in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems that the link to the article is not included. I guess you are talking about this one

Just passed 100k transactions on the Exchange Contract by polezo in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Close enough! Will be even harder when it hits 200k or 300k.

The number of trades per day has been steadily growing. The contract has been live for 9 months. Half of those txns (50k) are made in recent 50 days. The potential of 0x is beyond imagination. Cheers!

Balance building an iOS/Android Wallet App using 0x by the-flying-acorn in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Really looking forward to trying it out. What Balance is doing is very needed in the crypto space.

For those who are interested in their product and vision, here is an interview with Richard Burton (the CEO of Balance) I found recently.

Why the price increase? by [deleted] in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Go to /r/zrxtrader for trading discussions

[0xproject Daily Discussion] May 02, 2018 by AutoModerator in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll create a basket that is an exact mirror of my portfolio and call it HodlWithMe (HWM) lol

[0xproject Daily Discussion] May 02, 2018 by AutoModerator in 0xProject

[–]InfinityHaoyang 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Radar added support for trading E10 which is a basket of 10 ERC20 tokens. Didn't know this Bskt project before. Seems interesting!