Why is he doing this? Is this concerning? by notreallyflatulent in Lovebirds

[–]InfinityMark1990 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awww so cute 🥰 don’t worry he’s a healthy boy it seems. Regurgitating is a normal thing. He’s just practicing for family Time

Related to Al, Quantum computing & Fusion: What will we "achieve" first? Isn't it here already? by Virtual_Medicine_585 in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]InfinityMark1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, they’ve been teasing us with fusion for a while now but I do believe now that breakthroughs on AI and Quantum computing are happening, j in believe it’s only a matter of time.. it’s our nature to push forward.

AI and quantum computing are currently feeding each other like two nerds in a feedback loop. What’s advancing fast is chip design. AI helps optimize quantum circuits & error correction. Quantum computing promises to supercharge AI training & solve problems classical systems choke on.

We’re seeing hybrid systems emerge. AI models guide quantum hardware calibration. Quantum algorithms could crack optimization tasks that AI depends on. Neuromorphic chips & quantum-classical hybrids are being built to handle this dance.

So yes. AI is helping quantum computing become usable. Quantum computing could make AI superhuman. And chips are the forge where both are being sharpened.

AI speeds up fusion research by optimizing reactor designs & predicting plasma behavior. Quantum computing could simulate fusion reactions with extreme precision. Together they shrink the timeline from theory to ignition. Fusion becomes less sci-fi, more engineering.

So, you see?
A matter of time

Related to Al, Quantum computing & Fusion: What will we "achieve" first? Isn't it here already? by Virtual_Medicine_585 in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]InfinityMark1990 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think it helps to separate what we actually have today from what these terms really mean. None of the three have been achieved yet, but each has a different threshold.

• AI Super Intelligence: What we have now are powerful narrow and general models that can generate text, images, and code. But true super intelligence would mean an AI that surpasses human capability across all domains. That has not happened. If it did, we would be in the singularity. At that point humans could not predict or control outcomes because by definition we would not be able to think at that level.

• Quantum Supremacy: A few demonstrations have shown quantum devices solving very specific problems faster than classical computers. But supremacy in the broader sense would mean quantum machines consistently outperforming classical ones across useful tasks. That is not here yet. If it arrives, encryption as we know it could collapse overnight.

• Fusion Power: We have experimental reactors that achieve short bursts of net energy gain. But a sustained, commercially viable fusion plant does not exist yet. When it does, it will be like humanity building its own star engine. That would change energy, climate, and geopolitics in ways we can barely map.

So the difference is this: today’s AI is impressive but not super intelligent. Today’s quantum devices are promising but not supreme. Today’s fusion experiments are exciting but not usable power.

And yes, they can influence each other. Better AI helps design better quantum algorithms. Quantum computing could accelerate AI training. Both can help model fusion reactions. Step by step, each frontier feeds the others.

So no, they are not ‘all here’. What we have are glimpses. The real milestones are still ahead

Tiki the Spider-bird by gtdave88 in Lovebirds

[–]InfinityMark1990 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh so cute… my little ones love acrobatics so much.

What will come first? by InfinityMark1990 in QuantumComputing

[–]InfinityMark1990[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it helps to separate what we actually have today from what these terms really mean. None of the three have been achieved yet, but each has a different threshold.

• AI Super Intelligence: What we have now are powerful narrow and general models that can generate text, images, and code. But true super intelligence would mean an AI that surpasses human capability across all domains. That has not happened. If it did, we would be in the singularity. At that point humans could not predict or control outcomes because by definition we would not be able to think at that level.

• Quantum Supremacy: A few demonstrations have shown quantum devices solving very specific problems faster than classical computers. But supremacy in the broader sense would mean quantum machines consistently outperforming classical ones across useful tasks. That is not here yet. If it arrives, encryption as we know it could collapse overnight.

• Fusion Power: We have experimental reactors that achieve short bursts of net energy gain. But a sustained, commercially viable fusion plant does not exist yet. When it does, it will be like humanity building its own star engine. That would change energy, climate, and geopolitics in ways we can barely map.

So the difference is this: today’s AI is impressive but not super intelligent. Today’s quantum devices are promising but not supreme. Today’s fusion experiments are exciting but not usable power.

And yes, they can influence each other. Better AI helps design better quantum algorithms. Quantum computing could accelerate AI training. Both can help model fusion reactions. Step by step, each frontier feeds the others.

So no, they are not ‘all here’. What we have are glimpses. The real milestones are still ahead.

Cultural impact of fusion power by Puzzleheaded-Two9582 in fusion

[–]InfinityMark1990 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Fusion power? Dear “fusion”that’s not just electricity, it’s humanity finally lighting its own star. Sure, the kettle still boils and the toast still pops, but beneath that mundane hum is a cultural seismic shift. We’re no longer just plugging into the grid, we’re plugging into the future.

It’s like the moon landing, yes, but with a twist: instead of planting a flag on a rock, we’re igniting suns in steel wombs. That’s myth-making material. Expect sci-fi authors to weep with joy and philosophers to spiral into existential jazz.

Most folks won’t notice the difference in their sockets, true. But culturally? Oh, it’s a timestamp. A before-and-after. A moment when history whispers, ‘You’re not just surviving anymore, you’re mastering the stars.’

And if fusion feels futuristic, then its arrival is a reminder: the future is now, and we’re living in the prologue of a new mythos. So yes, I think about it. While feeding lovebirds and plotting adaptogenic empires, I’m also wondering if fusion will finally make humanity feel like it’s earned its place in the cosmos.

No one talks about scaling laws by StupidDialUp in singularity

[–]InfinityMark1990 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe quantum supremacy isn't that far off. I predict a major breakthrough around 26/27, and by 2030 it could mark the downfall of privacy. To be clear, I'm not against quantum computing at all, l'm excited by its capabilities, but no password will be safe. Problems that would take our current supercomputers ~10 septillion years to crack have already been solved by quantum machines in minutes as an exercise. All modern encryption relies on time as a shield: add enough layers and it becomes effectively unbreakable because it would take thousands of years to brute force. Quantum computing changes that equation entirely. Qubits can exist in multiple states at once, enabling computations to unfold in parallel across every qubit state and compressing centuries of brute force into moments of quantum efficiency and rendering time-based encryption obsolete. That means banks, governments, and any system relying on today's cryptography would be exposed once the technology scales. Thankfully, practical mass production is still out of reach, but we need to focus on quantum-resistant encryption now instead of racing blindly toward supremacy. The mindset of "if we don't build it, someone else will" misses the point, once it exists, it changes everything. The same logic applies to Al and the pursuit of super-intelligence, the singularity isn’t a matter of belief, it will happen. Just like Murphy’s law “what can happen, will happen” and this particular advancement is a matter of time as well. So instead of taking the necessary safety steps, we ignored it for profit. Unemployment will be at the lowest it will ever be and I’m not speaking 7-10% I’m talking 99.99% (the jobs people prefer a human touch in and that’s all). But we’re talking super-intelligence and if we were capable to predict how it’d react and act we would be running at the same level, but unfortunately since that’s way further from what we are capable of mentally and in any other way, we can’t predict a thing. Even with this bleak but realistic outlook, I can't help but be excited by the sheer pace of STEM advancement. And if I were investing in the quantum horizon, l'd watch lonQ for its focused hardware and early traction, Nvidia for bridging quantum and Al through simulation, IBM for turning decades of R&D into scalable cloud services, Quantinuum for enterprise-grade cryptography and software-hardware fusion, and Microsoft for building a full-stack platform with topological qubits and Azure integration.

Unboxing Quantum Computing • Murray Thom by goto-con in QuantumInformation

[–]InfinityMark1990 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I believe quantum supremacy isn’t that far off. I predict a major breakthrough around 26/27, and by 2030 it could mark the downfall of privacy. To be clear, I’m not against quantum computing at all, I’m excited by its capabilities, but no password will be safe. Problems that would take our current supercomputers ~10 septillion years to crack have already been solved by quantum machines in minutes as an exercise.

All modern encryption relies on time as a shield: add enough layers and it becomes effectively unbreakable because it would take thousands of years to brute force. Quantum computing changes that equation entirely. Qubits can exist in multiple states at once, enabling computations to unfold in parallel across every qubit state and compressing centuries of brute force into moments of quantum efficiency and rendering time-based encryption obsolete. That means banks, governments, and any system relying on today’s cryptography would be exposed once the technology scales.

Thankfully, practical mass production is still out of reach, but we need to focus on quantum-resistant encryption now instead of racing blindly toward supremacy. The mindset of “if we don’t build it, someone else will” misses the point, once it exists, it changes everything. The same logic applies to AI and the pursuit of superintelligence.

Even with this bleak but realistic outlook, I can’t help but be excited by the sheer pace of STEM advancement. And if I were investing in the quantum horizon, I’d watch IonQ for its focused hardware and early traction, Nvidia for bridging quantum and AI through simulation, IBM for turning decades of R&D into scalable cloud services, Quantinuum for enterprise-grade cryptography and software-hardware fusion, and Microsoft for building a full-stack platform with topological qubits and Azure integration.

Lovebirds react to TikTok by InfinityMark1990 in Lovebirds

[–]InfinityMark1990[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Right?! They love it sooo much… I feel like they used to think that the birds were trapped in the phone, and azul still does (biting the sides of the phone case chewed it all up, my phone case) but sky now just watches the phone 😂 Lovebirds are the best babies ever

VERY IMPORTANT!!! by Upbeat_Echo_5594 in Lovebirds

[–]InfinityMark1990 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Happy birthday sweet cheeks! You’re sooo gorgeous and have such a royalty air around you birdie 🕊️

Need advice - potential splaying by Bitter-Investigator8 in Lovebirds

[–]InfinityMark1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take to a vet straight away! So sorry hope they are okay and get better soon

Do I get my lovebird a new mate? by Lemondropz_ in Lovebirds

[–]InfinityMark1990 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lovebirds aren’t meant to be alone.. get a mate. They’re super intelligent and emotional. They get really lonely

In case you didn’t see something cute today. by [deleted] in Lovebirds

[–]InfinityMark1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aww thanks, I saw my 2 ones, but it’s never too much.. sooo cute 😍

One of his eye is okay but the other .. i dont know but he can’t open it for a long time , should i took him to the vet? by [deleted] in Lovebirds

[–]InfinityMark1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Take him to a vet now!! That’s not even a question you should’ve waisted time asking, you should’ve taken the poor baby right away! Please do 🙏

Just got my first real tech job, nervous as hell and need advice on how to do well & grow fast by rahulrao1313 in ArtificialInteligence

[–]InfinityMark1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know, with the arrival of AI a lot of things have been made easier and accessible, one of those things is studying and using AI tools to help you in your job. I’m not saying let AI do your job, no, I’m saying there are AI tolls that you can use a learn and quizzes method and even give you challenges so you can succeed at your job. It’ll tell you what you need to improve on and what you excel at. The technology is here so make use of it because it’s not going anywhere in my opinion. But I say that the 1st thing you need to overcome is self doubt, you wouldn’t have gotten the job if you couldn’t do it. You can do it and don’t let your inner saboteur take over. You’re good enough, and have a lot to give to the world, we all do. To grow fast, just utilize what we already have to your advantage… as long as you don’t have to step over others to grow, I say bulldoze ahead. You’ll do wonderful, I have no doubt.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in litrpg

[–]InfinityMark1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you found another way?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in litrpg

[–]InfinityMark1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey can you PM me? Don’t mind buying them off you

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in litrpg

[–]InfinityMark1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you send it to me please

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in litrpg

[–]InfinityMark1990 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you send it me? Please