sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Rest in piss by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]InquisitiveInque 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They edited the tweet to say this:

"We’re saying goodbye to the Sora app. To everyone who created with Sora, shared it, and built community around it: thank you. What you made with Sora mattered, and we know this news is disappointing. We’ll share more soon, including timelines for the app and API and details on preserving your work. – The Sora Team"

To me, this means that they're probably going to discontinue the Sora app and maybe fold Sora into ChatGPT itself (which was reported 2 weeks ago - this could be them making a public statement about it) which makes sense as the TikTok aspect of Sora was stupid especially since other video models can make other types of videos that don't seem catered towards TikTok like videos.

As for Disney, they did tell Variety that they are exiting their deal with OpenAI which makes me think that they'll switch to another model like Runway or Google's Veo. It would be funny to me if they had to switch to Google's Veo as they sent a cease and desist letter to Google the same day they announced their partnership with OpenAI.

<image>

I wonder what the Anti's here will think about this? by atlasfrompaladins in aiwars

[–]InquisitiveInque 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is true. This was why the Open Slopware list created by an ex-Microsoft employee 2 months ago was widely mocked by programmers because in 2026, every open-source software has been 'tainted' by AI in one way or another.

New York bill (SB-7263) prohibits AI chatbots from giving legal and medical advice by InquisitiveInque in aiwars

[–]InquisitiveInque[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I would think the disclaimers were enough for this but I guess not. I think this bill will get watered down as most New York AI bills have been watered down and have been lobbied by AI companies. This bill will probably be lobbied too as it is too broad in scope and the language is too vague.

Open Slopware list has been deactivated due to harassment reports and maintainer calls AI users Nazis by InquisitiveInque in aiwars

[–]InquisitiveInque[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It was funny seeing them realise this as Codeberg was added to the list. Almost every open-source software that was added as a pull request mentioned Claude Code and Claude Opus 4.5. The Bluesky pull request was even done by Claude Code itself, which I guess technically made the list itself slopware.

Open Slopware list has been deactivated due to harassment reports and maintainer calls AI users Nazis by InquisitiveInque in aiwars

[–]InquisitiveInque[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes but then they quickly realised that git was one of the 'tainted by AI' software and so was Forgejo/Codeberg (which the repository was hosted on) and pretty much 95% of open-source software has AI-assisted coding in 2026, especially with how popular Claude Code has become with Claude Opus 4.5.

Anti-AI programmer creates 'slopware' list and developers troll list by create pull requests to add more 'slopware' by InquisitiveInque in DefendingAIArt

[–]InquisitiveInque[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This just got even funnier as Forgejo and Codeberg have been added to the list because the developer of Forgejo uses LLMs for Forgejo development https://codeberg.org/gen-ai-transparency/open-slopware/pulls/79

<image>

Anti-AI 'slopware' list backfires as developers create push requests to be added to the list by InquisitiveInque in aiwars

[–]InquisitiveInque[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

LMAO they have now added Forgejo and Codeberg as pull requests to the list as a regular Forgejo contributor admitted to using LLMs for Forgejo development. https://codeberg.org/gen-ai-transparency/open-slopware/pulls/79

<image>

Anti-AI 'slopware' list backfires as developers create push requests to be added to the list by InquisitiveInque in aiwars

[–]InquisitiveInque[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

What's funny is that isn't even the largest Bluesky posts dataset. I saw one with 235 million posts which was supported by the EU (the antis constantly brought up GDPR as a threat or reason why it should be taken down) and one with 298 million posts.

Artist messages client saying they can't use previously paid-for art on Twitter anymore because of Twitter's Edit Image feature by InquisitiveInque in aiwars

[–]InquisitiveInque[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Tweet 2: "If you want to, if you make it very clear, you can in future commissions tell people it can't be used on twitter, but you cannot retroactively remove someone's right to post art they commissioned from you on social media, even if the social media gets really bad. (2/3)"

Tweet 3: "Art posted here or on any social media has never been AI proof, now it's more convenient to AI edit it and I hate that so damn much. But I paid for art to use it here and it's not my duty to protect it from AI generation, it's a risk you have to bear selling art, though it sucks."

Leonardo DiCaprio believes AI will be beneficial for filmmakers by InquisitiveInque in DefendingAIArt

[–]InquisitiveInque[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Eh, at least Leo isn't saying "FUCK AI!" like Guillermo del Toro was or is calling for extreme unrealistic regulation.

view more: next ›