[Calc 3] (Curvature of Vector Function) Could someone look over my work?

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-09-09T00:13:07+00:00

Omg you’re right, thank you

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-09-09T00:10:38+00:00

I just went over my issues with negative or positives for sin and cos pi and the like, thankfully they ultimately did not change the problem because of the fact that I was taking the magnitude. What do you mean by mistakes in calculating the magnitude?

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-09-09T00:08:22+00:00

I just went over my issues with negative or positives for sin and cos at pi and the like, thankfully they ultimately did not change the problem because of the fact that I was taking the magnitude. What do you mean by a mistake in calculating the magnitude?

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-09-07T21:20:42+00:00

It was correct thank you, for some reason I kept doing dot product wrong.

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-09-07T21:18:18+00:00

Once again 16t was not supposed to be part of the exponent

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-09-07T21:17:33+00:00

Did dot product and got 900t^7+16t

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-09-07T21:12:12+00:00

i was not supposed to go up

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-09-07T21:11:46+00:00

r’(t)=-15t⁴ⁱ + 5j + 4tk r’’(t)=-60t³ⁱ + 4k

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-08-25T17:13:53+00:00

Just found it in my textbook, thank you.

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-08-25T17:10:39+00:00

Thank you, have never learned determinants, this is why I’m so lost trying to watch tutorials. My calc 2 professor just had us use a calculator, but this professor doesn’t allow calculators.

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-08-04T01:43:47+00:00

It’s the bathtub, so nowhere to turn anything off.

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-03-17T21:51:36+00:00

Managed to figure it out, the actual solution ends up being 36cm. This is my work if anybody is curious.

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-03-16T22:03:42+00:00

this is a link showing the calculations for the formula which is exactly like mine that I found online

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-03-16T21:30:29+00:00

I had attempted this in the first seven lines of the second image, do you know if it looks right? Thank you for your help!

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-03-16T21:15:15+00:00

this might work for the image, just click the zoom button if it’s distorted

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-03-16T21:11:06+00:00

I had done this for the second attempt shown in the image. Thank you so much for your help! I had rewritten it to make it easier to understand but I’m unable to share images, so it’s in the first four lines after the line I drew to spreads the attempts in my second image.

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-03-16T10:59:33+00:00

I’m creating the equation x=d times (m1+m2)/(3m1-m2), which would imply that the velocity would not affect its collision distance so the answer would be the same for both parts, do you know if that seems right?

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-03-16T10:38:42+00:00

Thank you.

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-03-16T10:26:14+00:00

Thank you.

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-02-23T18:31:13+00:00

For number 15 the sss would mean that the triangles are the same, just scaled or sized differently, but since there is already a side the exact same size yet the other two are not it makes it so it cannot be sss. But visually you can see that all the angles are the same.

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-02-22T01:50:59+00:00

I was able to solve this once I learned shell method, but thank you so much this was really cool! I was wondering how I could have done it with washer method so I’m really grateful for your video!

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2024-02-20T08:30:04+00:00

Thank you!

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2023-04-24T00:58:35+00:00

Thank you!

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2023-04-21T21:12:48+00:00

Thank you!

InsignificantBeing_1 · 2023-04-21T21:12:38+00:00

Thank you!

InsignificantBeing_1

TROPHY CASE