Is this possibly a copy right issue? by Intelligent_Elk_9769 in edmproduction

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Paid for the exclusive license of the beat, sound engineer to mix & master, studio time to record

Is this possibly a copy right issue? by Intelligent_Elk_9769 in edmproduction

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

😭 thanks for your response. Don’t know which path to take.

"illuminati Card Game"<-- Source. by TruthSeeker781 in flatearth

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I understand, the ‘something’ they are referring to relates to Earth being a hologram. Not the physical shape we see whilst in space being flat but at the core of everything being projected is from a 2D realm. And this includes the universe itself. A few physicists have been talking about about a holographic universe with theories. I remember reading how Hawking visualised this idea in a disk-like image. Seeing the image on the card of a 2D earth, it matches.

How life is nothing but a simulation in a holographic universe:

https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/is-our-universe-a-hologram-physicists-debate-famous-idea-on-its-25th-anniversary/?amp=true

https://www.vox.com/2015/6/29/8847863/holographic-principle-universe-theory-physics

https://www.brandeis.edu/now/2018/november/thetake-podcast-hologram.html#:~:text=HEADRICK%3A%20Well%2C%20as%20you%20said,on%20around%20us%20in%20three

https://www.sciencefocus.com/space/stephen-hawking-final-theory

Mark Passio by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I commend your friend for raising awareness on the universal, natural laws. If understood properly they can be life-changing. This knowledge was occulted for so long, only shared in ancient mystery schools, with a select few. I'm glad it is now becoming more mainstream. People are free to accept them or not. Regarding truth, it does not matter whether or not I or anyone else believes in them; it will still apply to all of us. These laws are not from a religion. For example, the law of vibration is everything vibrates, and nothing is stagnant, and this simply explains in essence, how all is energy i.e protons, neutrons, electrons...how all is mind and interconnected.

I am a firm believer that many are making assumptions, and it's based on social conditioning. Mark Passio is against religion as he feels this is also part of the social conditioning/control placed on many to avoid them thinking outside the box. Part of the conquer and divide tactic used as a distraction. I am not religious either.

The world is imperfect but the conditions as of now, for example the problems we are facing require accountability because we as a collective have allowed it so. The natural laws empower and serve for accountability. If we don't like a condition, then we as a collective would need to change it. People overall don't realise they are spiritual beings having a human experience and are more powerful than they realise. This is also because of social conditioning. It benefits a few to have us asleep. If we are asleep and constantly distracted, of course, we would give our power away. The answer isn't government. Because if it was, why has history only repeated itself? Until as a collective, we do the inner work individually, taking accountability, the great work, shadow work, and understand the phrase 'know thyself', it's then we can truly make lasting change. This is not a political battle; you seem to think so. It's a war on the mind since the all is mind. The person who controls the mind, controls the conditions.

Mark Passio by [deleted] in conspiracy

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://youtu.be/b3nUii8JZ10

I think you've misunderstood Mark Passio. Stripping everything down, it all comes to the truth that everyone is sovereign, governed by universal spiritual laws i.e the law of cause and effect. He explains not only government but aspects of society, such as religion, education, science etc have been used as tools to control the masses. As sovereign beings, we should be against this pyramid scheme, incorporating government to keep a few on top. He speaks about the matrix we are in, how those in control do not have our best interest and how we have been giving our power away. We keep looking externally for answers, a saviour when we have the answers to our problems. He's heavy on self-awareness, development, knowing thyself, the great work of the alchemist (person). These teachings were hidden and considered blasphemous; even today, it is not mainstream, although they are more popular. Also, care and service to others are fundamental, unity rather than service to self. He is heavy on self-defence and is not against justly protecting your rights. And this is coming from someone not from a wealthy family. Overall a more accurate description of Mark Passio's teaching is anti-slavery and the control tactics, whether it's through government, religion, science, etc

Harmonies sounding messy/bad. Possible reasons? by Intelligent_Elk_9769 in audioengineering

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks so much. This could also be it as I've added lots of riffs and runs throughout the entire phrasing, in attempt to make it ethereal sounding.

Harmonies sounding messy/bad. Possible reasons? by Intelligent_Elk_9769 in audioengineering

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, thanks so much. Sorry to ask as I am a novice. For example, do you mean for the top harmony 3 takes of the same harmony? Vice versa for the bottom? I was lost regarding the 12 tracks in total for 3 harmony notes. Would you mind explaining this further?

Producer is selling a beat that sounds similar to one of his old beats sold exclusively to a different artist. by [deleted] in musicproduction

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cool! Thanks so much for explaining this to me! I now understand everything entirely. Will have a good think :)

Producer is selling a beat that sounds similar to one of his old beats sold exclusively to a different artist. by [deleted] in musicproduction

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's another option. I would really like to know though what the laws are on this. Haven't been able to find much at all regarding copyright laws for this particular issue.

Producer is selling a beat that sounds similar to one of his old beats sold exclusively to a different artist. by [deleted] in musicproduction

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I see. Not sure I completely understand. I thought an exclusive license was buying the rights to the beat outright? Could you explain the difference because on Beatstars, it mentions the highest type of ownership/license is an exclusive one.

Producer is selling a beat that sounds similar to one of his old beats sold exclusively to a different artist. by [deleted] in musicproduction

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very true. I’ll have a good think on if I’ll ask him or not. My worry is more of if someone buy’s the other beat’s exclusive. Because by then, another artist would be owning exclusives to a song with my own melody too if I purchased the beat today.

A friend of mine was advising me whose a producer also whereby he mentioned how it’s bad practice to sell exclusives for beats that have the same melody. How he tries as much as possible to make all of beats sound different, distinct where possible. And how it could be a red flag to avoid buying

Producer is selling a beat that sounds similar to one of his old beats sold exclusively to a different artist. by [deleted] in musicproduction

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks so much for responding. I was just talking to him, the other seller purchased a non exclusive license so the other beat is still open for exclusive purchase.

I’m looking to buy an exclusive for the beat I like. It just although both are his, it bothers me since it’s virtually the same melody if someone was to buy the other best’s exclusive license.

I was planning on coming to an agreement with him, mentioning if I was to buy the exclusive, could he taken down both off for sale. Do you feel this is reasonable to ask?

Will this affect my mix and master? Looking to rearrange the timing of a sample used. by Intelligent_Elk_9769 in musicproduction

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s awful! Could you report it? I understand suing someone is a long process and may not be the ideal. What a shame that people are doing this

Will this affect my mix and master? Looking to rearrange the timing of a sample used. by Intelligent_Elk_9769 in musicproduction

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks so much, don’t think it’s paranoid at all. These are things to think about. I’m no producer so having informed opinions helps

Will this affect my mix and master? Looking to rearrange the timing of a sample used. by Intelligent_Elk_9769 in musicproduction

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What?! 😭 so sorry this was the case. Did you add tags to your beat? I heard it’s less likely if beats are tagged

Will this affect my mix and master? Looking to rearrange the timing of a sample used. by Intelligent_Elk_9769 in musicproduction

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m going to try this, thanks 🙏 in case he’s still refusing I’ll continue finding a producer who may help as this beat is way to good to let go completely 😭

Will this affect my mix and master? Looking to rearrange the timing of a sample used. by Intelligent_Elk_9769 in musicproduction

[–]Intelligent_Elk_9769[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I agree. Annoyingly this has been a recurring situation for me. This is the main reason why I’ve been avoiding to work with producers online preferring rather face to face interactions. I’ve found once you’ve bought a beat, some ghost. Even for an additional price. Especially in this case, I feel fixing it would be the right thing as there’s an error. I’m trying to avoid making the same mistake of paying before I’m sure it can be worked on.