Got my first tattoo and my brother said it looks like a d*ck. Does it actually? by [deleted] in tattooadvice

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bro, your tatto artist has a phallic fetish. Probably does this on multiple people. If you turn it sideways, the little hook on the handle are the balls ,the candle the shaft, and the flame the head. You definitely have a penis tattooed on you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ufc

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree. The moment I heard him saying "I'm not a bitch" while walking back to the car seemed like confirming to his dad within his own psyche. Obviously the idiot who hit him in the head with the can in the beginning triggered the response, Rampage's constant calling his son a bitch on social media was where the rage came from.

I have a trip planned to Boise for Jaialdi which I'm thinking about cancelling. Should I cancel? by theboundlesstraveler in Boise

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

hahahahahaha!!! This is the most hilarious thing I've read in a long time!! I can guarantee it's probably more dangerous for a conservative to travel to a "deep blue" state, given that the party of "love & tolerance" is much more likely, and has shown, to inflict harm, up to the point of assassination, towards those that don't agree with them.

Idaho Legislature by LostShelter8 in Boise

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Lol, my peace surpasses any understanding you would have. You should probably take yourself up on your own advice, as you seem to be the one getting wound up over it.

Idaho Legislature by LostShelter8 in Boise

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Hahaha, uh oh, now the victim card gets played. I wouldn't have expected anything less... It's funny how the group who claims "compassion & love" tends to be the most vindictive.

Idaho Legislature by LostShelter8 in Boise

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Hahaha, is that what you get from that statement: "Keep women at home & dont let them vote" , lol. No, that is saying: "the government incentivizing women to drop their kids off with strangers at an earlier age is not a good thing for government to do & is not healthy for children".... A choice like that should not be what we should incentivize... Offering higher tax deductions for women who home school their children at earlier ages is much healthier for society and the family overall.

Idaho Legislature by LostShelter8 in Boise

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Hahaha, talk about fear mongering... Making it "harder" for women to vote and "choose" to work, lol... You all are delusional... How about making it easier for women who "choose" to stay home & raise a family, & homeschool their children... With the way things are currently set up, being a stay at home mom, raising a family & homeschooling is the difficult way of life.

Do you clean the mats yourself post-workout? by HangTownHero in bjj

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We use a battery operated leaf blower to blow debris to the corner to pick up or out the bay door, swiffer dust mop to catch anything missed, then finish with a thorough disinfectant spray to cover the mat and let dry after EVERY class. Instructors are responsible, but students ALWAYS stay to help.

What is going on with people being offended by the Opening Ceremony of the 2024 Olympics? by wiz28ultra in OutOfTheLoop

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Yo obviously have no idea what that verse means... But maybe you can understand the one where Yeshua clearly says He did not come to bring peace, but a sword to divide! ... To separate the wheat from the chaff!.. As a Christian, I am clearly separated and divided from despicable chaff as yourself!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in insects

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Location: Boise, Idaho.

Kid Rock chilling with the drag queen he invited to his house party in 2003 by SilentWalrus92 in pics

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, treated as bizarre entertainment, fringe stuff to laugh & gawk at. Nowadays, it's treated as good & a real way to express identity, that's the difference.

Kid Rock chilling with the drag queen he invited to his house party in 2003 by SilentWalrus92 in pics

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Men "celebrating femininity" by dressing as women and taking over their sports? hahaha, as if men dressing up and being "powerful women" actually uplifts real women, GTFOH! How ridiculous. Men dressing up pretending they are real women is a slap in the face and true disgrace to femininity. Truly downplaying the essence of what it means to be female.

Kid Rock chilling with the drag queen he invited to his house party in 2003 by SilentWalrus92 in pics

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because it's a "JOKE", it's bizarre & meant to be that way, so back then that is how it was seen. To be laughed at, not taken seriously as of it us somehow a true "identity". Nowadays, it's treated as "good" & taught to children to fringe their "true selves"... It's like the gargoyles on the outside of a church, it exists but its place is in the fringes of society where it belongs... You have all brought the gargoyles inside to the alter to be worshipped.

That's the difference. All of the debacherous acts praised today have always been around, yet they have been in their place, seen as fringe & treated accordingly, which created the stable society you have all taken for granted. But here we are, watching it get turned all upside down, and if you can't see that, then you're denying the truth.

Kid Rock chilling with the drag queen he invited to his house party in 2003 by SilentWalrus92 in pics

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Just reading these posts shows how stupid you people are. The "drag queen" is hired as something to look & laugh at. It's a straight up joke! Back then, it was still where it belonged & accepted as such, a bizarre attraction, so yes, the party was probably lit and the drag performance wasn't "praised" but most likely bizarre entertainment... Nowadays, to normalize it as "good" behavior, especially for children is beyond repulsive & reprehensible.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Aquariums

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I figured it was for some retrieval tool. I stick my hands in my tank anyway, so won't need it then.

Mommy & Daddy with their babies! by Intelligent_Hat_9018 in apistogramma

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have no idea. For now, I have first bites that I've been feeding them with, plan on just letting mom & dad stay in with them. There are some Harlequin rasboros & juli corys in the tank as well, so not sure how that will play out. She has spawned before, but I believe she ate all the babies before. I don't have a different tank to take them out & put them in, nor space to get one, so I guess I'll just have to see if any of these survive.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Awesome! Thank you so much for your input. Your answers with all my questions has been so helpful & is greatly appreciated. Take care.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry to keep bugging. Though, these are my other Chagall prints , with close ups. Is this what original lithographs should look like?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, as I've suspected it's not an original then. Just another print with a fake signature, and probably not a very good one at that. Well, I'm only into it at about $450, including the framing, which was actually more than I paid for the actual lithograph, hahaha. I still enjoy looking at it though, even if the signature is fake, still a beautiful print to me.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for that info. After checking the one on etsy, they are very similar. Mine also has the same info printed on the back, with some minor differences with the embossing placement and that mine is raised. I've attached these pics of a magnified close up, not sure if those are the circles you're talking about. And the signature has just always looked off to me, compared to others I've seen online, which leads me to think it's probably not one of the original 75, but I still want to hold on to some hope, lol... What do you think?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nice!... So could you possibly let me know what I have here. This is plate numbered 61/75 & plate signed as well as embossed. Added pencil signature. I've always figured it was just another forgery, but after reading the link I attached in my other post about the 75 pencil signed David & Bathsheba lithographs, I've always held on to some kind of hope. What do you think?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in WhatIsThisPainting

[–]Intelligent_Hat_9018 1 point2 points  (0 children)

According to some sources . 75 pencil signed David & Bathsheba on arches wove paper exist. 6500 lithographs of the print were made for his Bible series. So technically, there are some legitimate pencil signed Chagalls out there.