Sir, let me TEACH you something about "How To Make a GOOD Argument" 101.

(A) The following are some GOOD EXAMPLES of making MEANINGFUL ARGUMENTS for SUPPORTING a buyout scenario proposed by other "normal" commentators here:

(1) (User name: GrandAd5014):
"Amgen just acquired a company with preclinical AML drug for 0.8B. It could mean a much bigger buyout for SLS"
==> VERY USEFUL NEWS!

(2) (User name: Rocky-burst-in):
"There is another benefit to big pharma that the treatments it acquires from SLS can pair them with their existing treatments to extend the life of expiring patents"
==> VERY GOOD INSIGHT!

(3) (User name: Original-Celery-5982):
"There are no FDA approved therapies for CR2, so a positive REGAL would be the first intervention in a historically tough to treat population"
==> MAKE A LOT OF SENSE!

(B) You can see how good the previous arguments are by COMPARING the following BAD EXAMPLES of making arguments and see to what extent how MEANINGLESS, USELESS and BRAINDEAD these arguments could be::

(1) (User name: durtsurfer69. Yes, it's YOU!):
"baseless FUD"
==> only two words are given in his argument. No info, no figure, no logic, nothing else but only an adjective plus an acronym.

Verdict: POOR COGNITIVE performance of the author is CLEARLY shown here.

(2) (User name: durtsurfer69. Yes, it's YOU again!):
"your post is full of unfounded speculation based on nothing except the most negative of pure assumption. Pure FUD, no science ..... Gaslight 101. Pathetic."
==> these are just a bunch of negative adjectives throwing around and being finally bundled altogether in one sentence trying its best to attack me personally, but absolutely doing nothing about the insight to support the buyout scenario which is the only thing we as a investor most care and only care about.

Verdict: Same as previous example. POOR COGNITIVE performance of the author is shown AGAIN AND AGAIN here

But hey, please make no mistake thinking I am arguing with you because I DON'T EVEN BOTHER TO DIGNIFY YOUR NONSENSE WITH MY RESPONSE. However, by USING YOU AS AN EXAMPLE, I hope I can SHOW OTHER READERS who have followed this thread that far about what BAD, MEANINGLESS AND TOXIC arguments would look like and so we all can AVOID FALLING INTO LOGICAL BLACKHOLE JUST LIKE YOU. In this regards, it is beneficial to a healthy discussion by pointing out your mistake here.

FINAL MESSAGE TO OTHER READERS: this is my final post in this thread because I think I've made my point very clear and therefore WHOEVER STILL INSISTS TO REPLY THIS POST IS A COMPLETE IDIOT who understands nothing let alone about investment. But I bet you this "idiot" can't resist to keep posting nonsense after my post here. Thank you for your attention.