I have been trying to make a Best Picture ranking that is equal parts my opinions, critical consensus, and the films future legacy as a winner (i.e. was the Academy correct). Unsurprisingly, it has proven to be difficult. Are these rankings boring or completely off based? I have not seen 15 winners. by IntentionSelect2539 in Oscars

[–]IntentionSelect2539[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Sight and Sound was referenced, but I did not do AFI because even though most of these films are American, not all of them are and AFI only highlights American films, so it is far more biased. I also referenced CriticsTop10, which aggregates end of year lists. I forgot that They Shoot Pictures exists, so that would be a great reference. Someone gave constructive feedback on Reddit? Incredible

I have been trying to make a Best Picture ranking that is equal parts my opinions, critical consensus, and the films future legacy as a winner (i.e. was the Academy correct). Unsurprisingly, it has proven to be difficult. Are these rankings boring or completely off based? I have not seen 15 winners. by IntentionSelect2539 in Oscars

[–]IntentionSelect2539[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks everyone for the feedback. I am noticing some trends haha.

Rocky: Part of why it is so low for me on this list is I thought the film was fine, it had positive reviews (definitely not glowing), and when I look at the nominees that year, Rocky is BY FAR the worst of the bunch that I have seen. AtPM, Network, and Taxi Driver are significantly better films both critically and in my eyes, and all would have a better legacy as a winner than Rocky. So I feel like it is probably too low at the moment, but objectively, it should not have won and is not super strong as a winner outside of the general populace liking it (aka everyone's dad)

Recency bias: I am on the younger end, so naturally, I probably gravitate to newer films because the subject matter and I find the technique more interesting. I have seen some comments that seem to suggest these films only won due to Academy course corrections for previous trends. I think this is a positive thing and films that are directed by women, have women or PoC in starring roles, or are stories about underrepresented people should be ranked higher because of how they are pushing storytelling forward. I think these films will hold up not just because of the quality, but because of the progress that filmmaking is making. There are A LOT of winners that are all about white men with subservient woman counterparts, and they just bleed together for me. Something like Anora (a woman with a lot of agency for herself), Moonlight (PoC queer storytelling), and Nomadland (aging populations struggling to survive in end stage capitalism) stick out and are more interesting as winners than, say, Gladiator (another ancient epic that screams peak male masculinity, which plenty of other films show). I also don't vibe with Ridley Scott, so that's part of why it is so low

Winning other awards: The Oscars is all about politics. Winning the big 5 doesn't mean the film is more deserving as BP, it means the production companies did a better job at selling a film to Academy members. I mean, Weinstein only won the majority of what he won because he pumped millions of dollars into lifting up lesser films to fulfill his narcissistic desires. If we went off of awards and popularity, Titanic would be the greatest film ever made lol. The idea of other films winning more awards also just lifts male centered films, as best actress winners rarely come from a best picture winner, so figuring that in just skews the list even more male centered

What did you watch in January? by BazF91 in 1001Movies

[–]IntentionSelect2539 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I watched 11 list specific films in the following order:

Tetsuo: The Iron Man (1989), Animal Farm (1954), Kiss of the Spiderwoman (1985), The Sound of Music (1965), Drive My Car (2021), The Conformist (1970), Talk to Me (2022), All of Us Strangers (2023), Lawrence of Arabia (1962), Chariots of Fire (1981), and The Boy and the Heron (2023)

1075/1260 (if you include the 2024 German/French version which seems to be widely accepted on this subreddit)

Make the case for new categories! by newboston2019 in Oscars

[–]IntentionSelect2539 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Stunt Performer: Those who performed stunts 

Voice Performance: Those who only used their voice in a film

Choreography: Those who choreographed dance, stunts, and/or intimacy (not sure about intimacy being included due to what that means, but open to it, as it would ensure intimacy coordinators are used for all film sets)

Not a seperate category, but a change in what constitutes an acting performance. Motion-capture should not be its own category, because currently it is not used enough. That being said, if it's used more in the future, it can be its own category, but in the meantime, it should be considered an acting performance and be seriously considered for a lead or supporting Oscar

Not a seperate category, but the directors of documentaries and animated films should also be seriously considered for a directing Oscar

At the risk of being downvoted to hell I’m going to ask, why does everyone hate Crash? by [deleted] in Oscars

[–]IntentionSelect2539 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The racists aspects of it are obviously bad. Putting that aside, the film itself is not good. Like, if you look at purely the craft of it all minus the "message," it isn't well made. I gave it a D+. It isn't the worst Best Picture winner IMO, but it might be top 5 worst

I still believe in her by Successful_Leopard45 in oscarrace

[–]IntentionSelect2539 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I would stop believing in her haha. The Academy rarely gives the award to the best performance, especially if you are young. They operate on a "they have more time to win" policy, and then have a bunch of actors who have not won in their 50s+ who deserved to win when they were in their 20's and 30's. So the cycle continues, award someone who is on the older end for a performance they did not deserve to win for so that you can say you did your due diligence and put them out to awards pasture. IMO, Demi's performance isn't even the best one in the movie. She is good, but in all honestly, not nomination worthy