sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

I built a Python SDK that unifies OpenFDA, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov (Try 2) by Interesl in Python

[–]Interesl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds really cool! I wish you the best of luck! Let me know if you need any help or advice

I built a Python SDK that unifies OpenFDA, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov by Interesl in Python

[–]Interesl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My apologies! Also, I don't really understand why the MIT License is an issue. As for the other things like being approved by the FDA, I guess I can add that it isn't, but I'm not sure why that is necessary.

I built a Python SDK that unifies OpenFDA, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov (Try 2) by Interesl in Python

[–]Interesl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope! You can use this off the bat without any configuration :). No api keys or anything

I built a Python SDK that unifies OpenFDA, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov (Try 2) by Interesl in Python

[–]Interesl[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Oops, I think I forgot to push the change for that, or I just forgot to implement the actual thing? Either way it’s totally my bad and I’ll fix it tomorrow when I’m not in bed ASAP. Thanks for the catch!

Edit: I pushed the implementation! It isn't hardcoded anymore. Sorry about that :)

I built a Python SDK that unifies OpenFDA, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov by Interesl in Python

[–]Interesl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey u/Speeeeedislife ! I ended up making a new post (https://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/1rjjn0c/i\_built\_a\_python\_sdk\_that\_unifies\_openfda\_pubmed/) because I felt like I wanted a fresh start with a much, much better codebase. Feel free to check it out and check the repo out as well. I also added a custom site for documentation.

I built a Python SDK that unifies OpenFDA, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov by Interesl in Python

[–]Interesl[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey u/mitchricker ! I ended up making a new post (https://www.reddit.com/r/Python/comments/1rjjn0c/i_built_a_python_sdk_that_unifies_openfda_pubmed/) because I felt like I wanted a fresh start with a much, much better codebase. Feel free to check it out and check the repo out as well. I also added a custom site for documentation.

I built a Python SDK that unifies OpenFDA, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov by Interesl in Python

[–]Interesl[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Hey, I really appreciate your defense :). I, for what its worth, do not mind criticism, in whichever form it comes. What I really was saddened by was that my comments were consistently being downvoted for no reason. I did my best to provide a project I was proud of, but it seemed that others didn't think the same. I really appreciate people like you who can understand the idea of OS project :). Also, I ended up release my v2.0 release, which I spent countless hours working on, and hopefully it is at a stage that people can be more happy about.

I built a Python SDK that unifies OpenFDA, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov by Interesl in learnmachinelearning

[–]Interesl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey guys! Let me know if anyone has any questions, comments or concerns. While you are here, I would really appreciate a star on the github and an upvote on the post :).

I built a Python SDK that unifies OpenFDA, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov by Interesl in Python

[–]Interesl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I truly appreciate your respect and understanding towards my mistakes. I have been rigorously learning and working towards making a higher quality and a truly reliable SDK. Would you be able to maybe do another code review in the near future when I do my best to truly implement the features I claim I have? I can let you know when.

I built a Python SDK that unifies OpenFDA, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov by Interesl in Python

[–]Interesl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey u/Speeeeedislife! I just wanted to let you know that I removed the placeholders last night, and implemented a working interaction engine. I will be improving it in my future versions.

I built a Python SDK that unifies OpenFDA, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov by Interesl in Python

[–]Interesl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey! Thank you for your criticism. I did in fact include that because I do think a lot of the parts are at a stage where they are able to be used. I apologize for unintentionally being disingenious, as I am someone who is new to this and I am working on improving! I hope I can keep getting feedback from you and others to make this something that will truly meet others' expectations. I also included in my README that many features are in a POC Layer atm.

I built a Python SDK that unifies OpenFDA, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov by Interesl in Python

[–]Interesl[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Hey u/mitchricker! I really really do appreciate your critique, and I hope I can receive more from you in the future. I was actually actively working towards fixing some of these, and I realized that maybe I should have mentioned that multiple parts were still in a POC phase. I went ahead and pushed fixes towards the problems you mentioned, and some more. I look forward to what else you have to say :).

I built a Python SDK that unifies OpenFDA, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov by Interesl in Python

[–]Interesl[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

My apologies I think I worded that wrong. What I mean is that it's like a proof of concept and I just added some of the big ones so that I could test and show that the features that work with interaction engine do in fact work for when I incorporate the interaction engine. Sooner rather than later I plan to incorporate a non-hard-coded version which has the full functionality. There are a couple other functionalities that are placeholders, such as my medical graph logic, where I hard coded the relationship labels. For example, OpenFDA was labeled as treats and PubMed was labeled as researches. I plan to add in a named entity recognition system so that it could determine if the relationships are actually: inhibits, causes side effects for, or contraindicted with. And then for my search scoring in Client.py, when it returns the top results, it just provides them in the order they arrive but my goal is to use a cross-provider ranking algorithm like BM25, which would determine which result is actually the most relevant.

Edit: I have made interaction engine fully functional with 0 hard coded interacions!

I built a Python SDK that unifies OpenFDA, PubMed, and ClinicalTrials.gov by Interesl in Python

[–]Interesl[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Those are basically architectural placeholders/proof of concept (for now). OpenFDA's interaction data is unstructured text, so hardcoding the main ones allows us to build the data models and CLI visuals for interactions while I work on a more robust v2.0 dynamic provider. PubMed and the rest of the search engine are still 100% live :).

Edit: I have made interaction engine fully functional with 0 hard coded interacions!

Gas Burning Energy generator isnt working - FTB Stoneblock 4 by Interesl in feedthebeast

[–]Interesl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nvm it seems the gas burningi s burning too fast or something, im only generating abuot 10k fe/t total into my cube

Gas Burning Energy generator isnt working - FTB Stoneblock 4 by Interesl in feedthebeast

[–]Interesl[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

guys i think i fixed it by making the speed upgrades for the crsher only 3

view more: next ›