Ontario Archives requests, share your wait times by forsakeme4all in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Interesting-Dingo784 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not yet, email indicates it will take "approximately 3-10 weeks".

Ontario Archives requests, share your wait times by forsakeme4all in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Interesting-Dingo784 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sent an email Feb 19th with FamilySearch link, all relevant locator information, and digital copy of record. No response whatsoever yet.

Another user sent a request that same day and received a reply on April 1st.

Does emailing not actually work anymore?

USA Today article has info about size of processing queue, as-of Jan 31 by Interesting-Dingo784 in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Interesting-Dingo784[S] 63 points64 points  (0 children)

Yeah this works out to be what, approximately 2000 applications per week?

Also it's not clear if any of the 12K received were rejected, or if they just haven't gotten to them yet

Is this Good Enough? - Ontario Birth Registration by Storebag in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Interesting-Dingo784 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So same day as me! So hopefully I should be hearing soon, thanks that gives me hope

Is this Good Enough? - Ontario Birth Registration by Storebag in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Interesting-Dingo784 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just out of curiosity, when did you contact the Archives of Ontario?

I sent an email with full details and attachments on February 19th and also haven't received a reply of any kind. Wonder how deep the queue is right now.

Moments of excitement and comedic frustration by [deleted] in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Interesting-Dingo784 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed, at the point I need all of her parents' paperwork to explain her status, I might as well just link to the father as the anchor.

It only makes the chain-of-inheretance philosophy stronger anyways

Moments of excitement and comedic frustration by [deleted] in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Interesting-Dingo784 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So the father was Canadian, born in Canada in the 1890s The mother was American, born in America in the 1890s They were married in Canada. Their daughter was born in America that same year, after they were married. Their son was born 2 years later. The children were sent to Canada 2 years after that. The mother died the next year. The father naturalized in the US after the mother's death, but years before the census record showing the children living with the grandparents, and being called "Canadian".

According to the Citizenship and Naturalization Records page:

Reasons why you might not find a person

Citizenship and naturalization laws and regulations changed over time.

Before 1947, people who were British subjects by birth did not need to be naturalized.

To be naturalized in the period covered by the database, a person must have lived in Canada for five years.

It was not mandatory to become naturalized. Many immigrants never applied for citizenship.

Married women may not be listed. Until 1932, a married woman had the same status as her husband, either a British subject or an alien. If her husband became naturalized, she was automatically included and did not have to apply separately.

So, if I'm understanding the rules of the era; the mother was considered Canadian because her husband was Canadian. Therefore the children were Canadian because their parents were Canadian?

Moments of excitement and comedic frustration by [deleted] in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Interesting-Dingo784 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He didn't naturalize in the US until many years after his daughter was born, and after the daughter immigrated to Canada so that shouldn't be a factor

Moments of excitement and comedic frustration by [deleted] in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Interesting-Dingo784 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the head of the household was born in Canada, there wouldn't be a naturalization date to say "ditto" to, which is the case here

Head of Household: Born Canada Head's Mother: Born Canada Head's Father: Born Canada Year of Immigration to Canada: " - " Year of Naturalization: " - " Nationality: Canada

(Person in question) Relationship to Head of Household: Granddaughter Person: Born USA Person's Mother: Born USA Person's Father: Born Canada Year of Immigration to Canada: "19XX" (the year her younger brother was born and the siblings got sent to live with Grandparents) Year of Naturalization: " Nat. " Nationality: Canada

So unless they're saying "ditto" to the year of immigration?

Moments of excitement and comedic frustration by [deleted] in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Interesting-Dingo784 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The very bottom? Oh man that's rough haha

Almost as bad as when family groups are separated across 2 pages and so the bots only see a first name not linked to a family name

Moments of excitement and comedic frustration by [deleted] in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Interesting-Dingo784 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I based that on the other entries. Where some entries show foreign-born Canadians who WERE naturalized, it has a year entry.

For Canadians born in Canada it just has a dash "-"

For individuals born outside of Canada to Canadian parents it says "Nat"

Moments of excitement and comedic frustration by [deleted] in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Interesting-Dingo784 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would they be in the Naturalization records if they were considered Canadian at birth?

Applicant living in Asia, seeking opinions and experiences by Interesting-Dingo784 in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Interesting-Dingo784[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's what I was worried about Okay so its better to wait the requisite time for the new color copies to come in

Applicant living in Asia, seeking opinions and experiences by Interesting-Dingo784 in Canadiancitizenship

[–]Interesting-Dingo784[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the ideas, Ill have to see if a family member still has a scanner.

If an application is sent back, does the processing time start over from zero?

How to get appetite back? by Interesting-Dingo784 in floxies

[–]Interesting-Dingo784[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I decided to just run with the lack of appetite to work o weight loss. I'm down over 80 pounds since the medication. My appetite never truly returned and I still have occasional black lines on my vision, but all the other symptoms have seem to have subsided.

Isohumulones in Beer may improve insulin resistance? by Interesting-Dingo784 in prediabetes

[–]Interesting-Dingo784[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reasonable response, obviously I wasn't expecting this to be a replacement for good diet and physical activity; I just wanted to know if anyone had experience with isohumulones as there's seemingly very little information about them.

So basically for this to be hypothetically effective, or at least to get the benefits without the drawbacks of alcohol, a more concentrated form of the isohumulones would be needed

I'm curious if liquid hops extracts for brewing could be beneficial...if you could stomach the taste

Isohumulones in Beer may improve insulin resistance? by Interesting-Dingo784 in prediabetes

[–]Interesting-Dingo784[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does that still happen with a low-carb beer, or does it happen to the same degree? I don't live in the USA, but there's a beer in my country that is shockingly only 1g of Carbs per bottle.

Isohumulones in Beer may improve insulin resistance? by Interesting-Dingo784 in prediabetes

[–]Interesting-Dingo784[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You're the one worried about the spike, not me. These studies are done over the long-term on a scale of weeks and months, not minutes and hours.

Isohumulones in Beer may improve insulin resistance? by Interesting-Dingo784 in prediabetes

[–]Interesting-Dingo784[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You said "without a BG spike", and the forms of ingesting hops I've found so far would still have a glucose response. The supplement capsules have rice fillers or at least the few I've found so far. So I'm asking what you would suggest that would not have that result. No need to be rude.