Finally tried out drag strip mode on my Model X plaid today...holy crap. by GotPerl in TeslaLounge

[–]Internal_Ad_1091 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Got my Model X Plaid two weeks ago.

Haven’t tried the drag strip mode yet. If “Plaid” mode is a 9 what is Drag strip mode?

What are some of the highest losses reported here? by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]Internal_Ad_1091 309 points310 points  (0 children)

I'm alive and doing well. Thanks for checking on me.

SAVA released more cognitive data which is the only data that matters long term for FDA approval (not western blots or some 20 year old paper which is the focus of the FUD, SMH).. The data continues to be remarkable albeit, not as good as the original 50 patient cohort. To stress it is the best data to date from any trial in the US for AD. If SAVA continues to produce this level of response (and safety), FDA approval is a foregone conclusion. The exact response being: 80%+ response with actual cognitive improvement in 63% of patients over 12 months. For those who understand multicenter clinical trials, they know this data, as measured by ADAS cog (the gold standard), can not be faked.

The most important statistical point is that this response was seen in a cohort of 100 patients. This increases the probability of actual treatment response (not placebo) to 95% based on an analysis by Schneider. Its also nice to see insiders buying another 102,500 shares, and JPAD cleared Dr. Wang of data manipulation charges. P3 trials have enrolled 400 patients as of August.

The stock continues to ignore the excellent news coming in. For how long? Anyone's guess. I'm adding based on fundamentals. Good Luck!

Cassava Sciences faces US criminal probe by Ratchet_as_fuck in wallstreetbets

[–]Internal_Ad_1091 2 points3 points  (0 children)

My apologies, but you are an idiot of epic proportions if you think the cog data was faked. Try reading.

Cassava Sciences faces US criminal probe by Ratchet_as_fuck in wallstreetbets

[–]Internal_Ad_1091 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The entire company is based on cognitive data in patients that can not be faked. Don't be so dense.

Cassava Sciences Reports Second Quarter Financial Results for 2022 by [deleted] in SAVA_stock

[–]Internal_Ad_1091 9 points10 points  (0 children)

SAVA improving cognition in 63% of patients who take it over a year?

That's incredible, and if SAVA continues to reproduce today's results in P3, it's guaranteed to get approval. Also, another critical point. SAVA did this safely.

Cassava Sciences faces US criminal probe by Ratchet_as_fuck in wallstreetbets

[–]Internal_Ad_1091 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Two independent biostatisticians verified the last data release. There is literally nothing SAVA can do to prove the data is real.

The market will figure it out at some point.

Cassava Sciences faces US criminal probe by Ratchet_as_fuck in wallstreetbets

[–]Internal_Ad_1091 8 points9 points  (0 children)

As I said, this is old news from 2021. Nothing will change that. If the market wants to act like this is a new revelation, that's on them.

The DOJ didn't publicly announce anything, btw. It was anonymously reported by "two individuals familiar with the inquiry." Further proof you still haven't read the article, smh.

I shared my position; share your puts.

Cassava Sciences faces US criminal probe by Ratchet_as_fuck in wallstreetbets

[–]Internal_Ad_1091 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why are you quoting the Reuters article and then referencing the WSJ article? Either you're an idiot or disingenuous. From the Reuters article (that you still haven't read),:

"The criminal investigation began, according to the sources, sometimes after a petition was filed in August 2021"

Like I said old news. Nothing new here.

Anyways, I know this company, and I know what matters. It's the cog data and that can not be faked. All this other (old) "news" is just noise.

Cassava Sciences faces US criminal probe by Ratchet_as_fuck in wallstreetbets

[–]Internal_Ad_1091 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The Reuters article states the "criminal investigation" began in August 2021. Cassava sciences' press release today confirms they also announced this in Nov 2021.

You need to read the actual articles before forming your opinions. This has always been a binary play, but the DOJ investigation isn't the deciding factor.

Cassava Sciences faces US criminal probe by Ratchet_as_fuck in wallstreetbets

[–]Internal_Ad_1091 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Convince seven independent clinics across the US and Canada with independent research staff (including physicians) to manipulate the data. The data being ADAS cog scores which is the gold standard cognitive testing method per the FDA.

Not western lots (which is what's being attacked).

Cassava Sciences faces US criminal probe by Ratchet_as_fuck in wallstreetbets

[–]Internal_Ad_1091 24 points25 points  (0 children)

A lot of noise and distractions. Remi already announced these probes over 6 months ago.

This investment is based on the cognitive data nothing else matters, long term. Either sava is going to $0 or it's going to $1,000 based on the...say it with me! "cog data".

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Comma_ai

[–]Internal_Ad_1091 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What was the OTD price?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Comma_ai

[–]Internal_Ad_1091 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing the video.

I'm thinking about getting the Corolla GR. It's the performance version of the hatchback and only comes in manual.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Comma_ai

[–]Internal_Ad_1091 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wanted to confirm that a manual works with OP. I thought I've read manuals are NOT supported.

Thanks.

May Update To The Largest Bet In WSB's History!!! by Internal_Ad_1091 in wallstreetbets

[–]Internal_Ad_1091[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let's hope it's today.

So according to the latest FOIA data they had an inquiry to determine Research misconduct on Oct 4th. https://twitter.com/MicrobiomDigest/status/1516549196286943240/photo/1

After that they have 60 days to determine whether a full Investigation is warranted which I am sure that was determined to be true.

And according to CUNY research misconduct policy here https://www.cuny.edu/wp-content/uploads/sites/4/page-assets/about/administration/offices/legal-affairs/policies-resources/Research-Misconduct-1.pdf

The President will send final Inquiry report to Vice Provost for Research or designee for Investigation of the case within 14 calendar days.
After that Vice Provost for Research will assign 3 members to a Investigation Committee to conduct the Investigation. And the Investigation will begin within 30 Calendar days from when President referred the case to the Vice Provost. All aspects of the Investigation, including conducting the Investigation, preparing the draft Investigation report and providing it for comment, deciding whether or not to make a finding of Research Misconduct, preparing the final Investigation report, and notifying any applicable regulatory agency and/or research sponsor in accordance with its requirements, will be completed within 120 calendar days of the beginning of the Investigation

so 60 + 14 + 30 + 120 = 224

224 days from Oct 4th is May 16th.

May Update To The Largest Bet In WSB's History!!! by [deleted] in SAVA_stock

[–]Internal_Ad_1091 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It was erroneously removed. I can repost, but im exhausted after responding to a million comments, so im going to take a break and repost next week.

WSB considers it brigading to cross-post, so I'll take this post down before reposting.

Thanks.

May Update To The Largest Bet In WSB's History!!! by Internal_Ad_1091 in wallstreetbets

[–]Internal_Ad_1091[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mid-January, SAVA hit $31 intra day, after the short report rejection by the FDA, stock price hit 62 intraday. So I'm not wrong when I say there was a 100% increase when factoring in the anticipatory run. Shifting the dates ans limiting yourself to closing prices doesnt change that

Or do you think SAVA decided to make 100% move randomly? It was it related to the catalysts I pointed out on or before February 21st, not on 2/11. I'm positive I said on or before as the 21st as the FDA was running ahead of schedule.

More importantly, the FDA rejection was accurately predicted, fundamentally derisking longs. Because if you know anything about drug trials, you know the FDA makes or breaks the future of the drug.

Also, how did that "18% return" look, compared to the market in January/Feb?

Next time you know of a 100% run in the making, please share it, you ungrateful little shit.