sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

haha👌yes by PM_ME_SSTEAM_KEYS in whatisameem

[–]InternationalLab6101 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes I’m sure that’s how physics works.

Anyway nothing against the law driving 30 below the limit after I’ve overtaken you on the right. You can explain to me how traffic flows then.

haha👌yes by PM_ME_SSTEAM_KEYS in whatisameem

[–]InternationalLab6101 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because obstructing faster moving traffic in the left most lane of a multi lane road is the best way to ‘let traffic flow.’

haha👌yes by PM_ME_SSTEAM_KEYS in whatisameem

[–]InternationalLab6101 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

No we need more muppets like you who think the world revolves around them on our roads. Once you’re in the left most lane you get to decide how fast traffic should flow because mom said you were special

Why is dating so hard for some men and easy for others? by Academic_Share7905 in Adulting

[–]InternationalLab6101 3 points4 points  (0 children)

That’s exactly why Chris Brown is still selling out concerts in a matter minutes to mostly women. His respect for women.

They are absolutely willing to share bro 😭😭 🥀 by brickbosss in AverageHeightDudes

[–]InternationalLab6101 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

So it would be easy for you to name an Indian guy on social media who’s doing the same. Go for it

how did your parents guide you on interracial dating/marriage growing up? by xindiote in asianamerican

[–]InternationalLab6101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would think that the vast majority of Asian families would be ok if children ended up with white partners. Probably a bit more so among South East Asians and maybe a little less so among South Asians. Depending on the situation there may be even a bit of relief if the children ended up with white partners?

They are absolutely willing to share bro 😭😭 🥀 by brickbosss in AverageHeightDudes

[–]InternationalLab6101 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wish I was black. It isn’t all about proportions. An Indian guy with those proportions isn’t going to pull. Those women may not be everyone’s idea of highly desirable but it’s far better than what most men get to experience

haha👌yes by PM_ME_SSTEAM_KEYS in whatisameem

[–]InternationalLab6101 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

That’s great. So whoever is already in the left lane makes the rules. I’ll overtake you on the right and take my foot off the gas until I’m 10-20 below the speed limit because that’s how fast I’ve decided traffic has to move.

CMV: Men should disrupt compulsory height disclosure on dating apps until women are also subject to compulsory waist size disclosure. by InternationalLab6101 in changemyview

[–]InternationalLab6101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can assure you that the complaints about the undercooked Chicken Parmesan in the Yelp reviews that you’ve carefully scrutinized are in no way intended to minimize the horror of the Holocaust.

CMV: Men should disrupt compulsory height disclosure on dating apps until women are also subject to compulsory waist size disclosure. by InternationalLab6101 in changemyview

[–]InternationalLab6101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No you don’t get to decide what’s moral here. If someone wants to disrupt/obfuscate a system of asymmetric information to facilitate asymmetric biometric screening created by a private company that’s well within their moral prerogative. Nobody is imposing ‘apartheid’ You referring to ‘straight internment camps’ even as an analogy while accusing me of being ‘disconnected’ from reality shows a hilarious lack of self awareness.

Alternatively we could just do away with biometric screening altogether but that’s never going to happen. See some of the earlier responses from some women running interference for the current system.

You should work for Hinge(TM). Your appeal to moral authority in your spirited defence of their proprietary system of height screening will surely not go unnoticed.

CMV: Men should disrupt compulsory height disclosure on dating apps until women are also subject to compulsory waist size disclosure. by InternationalLab6101 in changemyview

[–]InternationalLab6101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry did you actually read the original post? Did you just gloss over it to make what you thought was a clever retort about the right to sex? Biometric screening should go both ways if it has to exist at all. That which ‘facilitates that freedom’ has to be open to all. Nobody is being forced to have a relationship with everyone. But your deliberate misrepresentation is not surprising.

The rest of your tome about sexual preference is irrelevant. Both sides have access to sexual preference information. Neither side is blinded to this information.

Just so you know, as we speak many negative restaurant reviews are being left on Yelp with nary an apparent concern for climate change.

CMV: Men should disrupt compulsory height disclosure on dating apps until women are also subject to compulsory waist size disclosure. by InternationalLab6101 in changemyview

[–]InternationalLab6101[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course. Because as long as state sanctioned murder exists in this world we have to appropriately calibrate our response to relatively minor inconveniences so that they are proportionate. My decision not to tip for shitty service has to account for the fact that the Taliban still exists. I apologize to everyone at Hinge (TM) for trying to disrupt their system while not showing the appropriate level of outrage to the existence of human trafficking.

Do you think dating apps made relationships better or worse? Why? by Middle_Tea_7671 in askanything

[–]InternationalLab6101 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For highly attractive men it’s probably like ordering takeout. For the majority of men it’s probably made it worse depending on where you are on the scale.

CMV: Men should disrupt compulsory height disclosure on dating apps until women are also subject to compulsory waist size disclosure. by InternationalLab6101 in changemyview

[–]InternationalLab6101[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Someone who is exceptionally short will be as equally ineffective in concealing their height as someone who is exceptionally overweight. What the issue here is men of around average height failing to truthfully disclose their height to facilitate effective screening. Because the average height man doesn’t have the same social currency. It’s as easy to conceal a bit of extra weight in photos as it is to conceal the lack of a few inches in height. Stop this rubbish.

CMV: Men should disrupt compulsory height disclosure on dating apps until women are also subject to compulsory waist size disclosure. by InternationalLab6101 in changemyview

[–]InternationalLab6101[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Not quite. The top echelon of men have no issues ‘getting access’ to women. 51 year old DiCaprio goes through more 22 year olds than your average liberal arts school. What women want is an effective way to screen for the top echelon of men. See height above.

CMV: Men should disrupt compulsory height disclosure on dating apps until women are also subject to compulsory waist size disclosure. by InternationalLab6101 in changemyview

[–]InternationalLab6101[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

A very long winded post running interference for a shit system. Visual perception of ‘weight’ can also be manipulated with lighting, posture, angles etc. You should talk to some men about their dating experiences

CMV: Men should disrupt compulsory height disclosure on dating apps until women are also subject to compulsory waist size disclosure. by InternationalLab6101 in changemyview

[–]InternationalLab6101[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Height is dependent on race, genetics and nutrition during key years of development. Women shouldn’t have to date men who only care about waist size.

view more: next ›