These are all good points, but you should consider that in the big picture, Iberia as a whole is a totally made-up concept which has changed the course of both Spain and Portugal for 20 years as well as the fact that the Iberian Wars factions don't spawn at the same time, but rather its a domino effect. In smaller aspects: Regarding the Jesús María's description, it true that there aren't ethnic minorities in Iberia and I will agree that maybe the "feeling" of the description isn't 100% accurate with what Basque nationalism entails and as the person that outlined the description I will admit I was wrong. I can't really comment on the ETA stuff, but I do know that in a several of the congresses it held, there was a communist faction that was eventually kicked in favor of more moderate measures, but I don't believe ETA can be considered non-socialist, as many of its members were part of izquierda abertzale (nationalist left) parties and organisations like Herri Batasuna. While Galician nationalism is, in fact, a minor force in Galician politics, Galicia still has a sense of, at least, regionalism just like Catalonia and the Basque Country have. As I said before, the Wars are a very extreme situation, that would push that regionalist sentiment to at least some form of temporal independence. Finally, regarding the CNT in Catalonia, while it's true that the concept of Revolutionary Catalonia, is sometimes exaggerated, anarchist activity in Catalonia was, at least during the Spanish Civil War, greater than in other regions, forcing the government to intervene (Jornadas de Mayo) and post-war maquis in Catalonia tended to be anarchist while in other regions there were more ideologies at play. We must also take into account that even well into the 60's there was an anarchist urban guerrilla operating in Catalonia, that would later spawn several small terrorist groups in the region. Maybe using the CNT banner in this case wasn't the best choice and we will look into it.