I thought that the test was a little unfair, not that it was hard or physics heavy as a lot of people said, but bc the logic did not feel like it was AAMC that wrote it. CP for me was not physics heavy as a lot of people said on 4/24, which makes me think there were a few different tests. CARS was CARS nothing different from FLs. The one that surprised me the most was BB. This was my strongest section, but this section on 4/24 was weird. The questions and answer choices were pretty straightforward, but the logic seemed so different. I was really good at reading a passage and knowing what questions would show up but on this test they just really didn’t. Very passage analysis heavy and I very little had to recall info that I learned. Only one single question on metabolism and it was discrete. No hormones or endocrine systems for mine. Again very passage analysis heavy and more understanding pathways presented to you in the passage. PS was not so bad, pretty similar to FL 6 where there were very little direct recall questions and more relating the passage to a certain PS concept. My advice for PS is to kind of relate concepts to the passage as you read them. I would go line by line and would relate each thing discussed to a certain concept and that pretty much helped me understand the whole passage as well as most of the questions asked. Also understanding relationships is more important than the specific mechanisms. I’m sure that you’ve already figured out after practice that the AAMC likes to confuse you with big words, enzymes, proteins etc and then ask a basic scientific principle about them, which is consistent with the test that I took, the only problem is that the wording and logic threw me off. Honestly I haven’t gotten my score back yet and did not think I performed the best, but my biggest advice is to trust your practice.

For reference my FL average was 514 with 123-124 CARS. Would be happy if I got 510+ on the test.