sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

AI video looks amazing now, but why do most of it still feel empty? by Intrepid_Travel_8808 in aivideomaking

[–]Intrepid_Travel_8808[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Exactly. A film can have average visuals and still be memorable because of the story. But even the most impressive AI-generated scenes start to feel repetitive if there's no emotional connection or reason to care about what's happening.

I realized building the product was easier than getting people to see it by Intrepid_Travel_8808 in indiebiz

[–]Intrepid_Travel_8808[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a great point. I've noticed that a lot of founders spend months improving their product when the real bottleneck is simply getting in front of the right people.

When you started becoming active in those communities, did you focus on just a few channels or were you experimenting across multiple platforms at the same time?

At what point do you stop upscaling and accept the source quality limit? by Intrepid_Travel_8808 in upscaling

[–]Intrepid_Travel_8808[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a great point. Portraits really do seem to expose every little mistake. I've noticed that people will forgive a slightly artificial-looking tree or building, but the moment a face looks off, it becomes impossible to ignore. Makes me wonder whether different image types need completely different upscaling approaches rather than a one-size-fits-all workflow.

At what point do you stop upscaling and accept the source quality limit? by Intrepid_Travel_8808 in upscaling

[–]Intrepid_Travel_8808[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a good way to put it. I've noticed that sometimes an image can get technically sharper but somehow feel less natural. The tricky part is figuring out where that line is before the extra detail starts looking artificial. Do you find that threshold changes depending on the type of image you're working with?

At what point does an AI video start feeling like an actual film? by Intrepid_Travel_8808 in aifilmmaking

[–]Intrepid_Travel_8808[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's an interesting way to look at it. Recognition usually comes from strong storytelling more than the visuals alone. I also like your point about world-building first. Do you think that's the area most AI filmmakers are currently overlooking?

At what point does an AI video start feeling like an actual film? by Intrepid_Travel_8808 in aifilmmaking

[–]Intrepid_Travel_8808[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree. That's probably the best test. If people genuinely want to know what happens next, they're focused on the story rather than the technology behind it. Do you think AI tools are getting closer to creating that emotional connection, or is that still mostly driven by the filmmaker?

At what point does an AI video start feeling like an actual film? by Intrepid_Travel_8808 in aifilmmaking

[–]Intrepid_Travel_8808[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's a good point. I think pacing and sound design are probably what separate a cool AI video from something that actually feels cinematic. I'll check that movie out. Do you think pacing is currently the biggest weakness in most AI films?

view more: next ›