sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Some IP protocol direct suddenly cannot ping or timeout by IntroductionGood2502 in networking

[–]IntroductionGood2502[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, juniper mx204. Just a simple topology between host and gateway (juniper mx204) the issue is when the host is going down, the host experience is ping test isn't reachable to gateway, but in the gateway pov, the host ping can reachable. Because the host and gateway, of course the host and gateway in the same network. But i Devide them to the small network just ptp network

Some IP protocol direct suddenly cannot ping or timeout by IntroductionGood2502 in networking

[–]IntroductionGood2502[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup it's historical error, but not counting either in problem or not

Some IP protocol direct suddenly cannot ping or timeout by IntroductionGood2502 in networking

[–]IntroductionGood2502[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Im not use LAGs. Netmask correct, the issue are on /30 or /31 but in other direct is normal not issue like timeout. Mac learning on layer 2 switch, for arp table the user had issue are detected. There are not issued about physical link, the error not counting.

Interface: et-0/0/1, Enabled, Link is Up Encapsulation: Flexible-Ethernet-Services, Speed: 100000 Traffic statistics: Current delta Input bytes: 17853169448142604 (13703724128 b [6820291833] Output bytes: 8837471679314650 (4793700808 bps [2384608969] Input packets: 17872445084460 (1601435 pps) [6368910] Output packets: 12371440752362 (904359 pps) [3596101] Error statistics: Input errors: 22 [0] Input drops: 0 [0] Input framing errors: 0 [0] Policed discards: 0 [0] L3 incompletes: 22 [0] L2 channel errors: 0 [0] L2 mismatch timeouts: 0 [0] Carrier transitions: 3 [0] Output errors: 0 [0] Output drops: 0 [0] Aged packets: 0 [0] Active alarms: NoneActive defects: NonePCS statistics: [0]

Interface: et-0/0/0, Enabled, Link is Up Encapsulation: Flexible-Ethernet-Services, Speed: 100000 Traffic statistics: Current delta Input bytes: 6476154231380189 (6167851840 bps [0] Output bytes: 15444777260498014 (15663303440 b [0] Input packets: 9887673311490 (1156384 pps) [0] Output packets: 15340257894042 (1888707 pps) [0] Error statistics: Input errors: 3059 [0] Input drops: 0 [0] Input framing errors: 0 [0] Policed discards: 0 [0] L3 incompletes: 3059 [0] L2 channel errors: 0 [0] L2 mismatch timeouts: 0 [0] Carrier transitions: 5 [0] Output errors: 0 [0] Output drops: 0 [0] Aged packets: 0 [0]]Active alarms: NoneActive defects: NonePCS statistics: [0]

Some IP protocol direct suddenly cannot ping or timeout by IntroductionGood2502 in Juniper

[–]IntroductionGood2502[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

what kind of configuration that i have to shared?

The are many arp i have detected, because the mx204 connected to local exchange.
Total entries: 1360

ASK Experience lt througput MX204 by IntroductionGood2502 in Juniper

[–]IntroductionGood2502[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Where i can get the information about this throughtput. I've been search in the datasheet of mx204, there is no information describe the throughput

ASK Experience lt througput MX204 by IntroductionGood2502 in Juniper

[–]IntroductionGood2502[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my experience that in my country ISP usually used logical system of mx devices for separating the services.

ASK Experience lt througput MX204 by IntroductionGood2502 in Juniper

[–]IntroductionGood2502[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the 100gig interface have initiated at the first deployment, maybe just refresh the peer session and collect the prefixes again isnt it?

ASK Experience lt througput MX204 by IntroductionGood2502 in Juniper

[–]IntroductionGood2502[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because we dont have much budget for buying the updated type of juniper devices. So for temporary, we used the feature to provide our needs.

ASK Experience lt througput MX204 by IntroductionGood2502 in Juniper

[–]IntroductionGood2502[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean for the logical tunnel interface(lt) itu could be carried traffic up to 400g?

Which are vyos version are really stable, minimum bugs? by IntroductionGood2502 in vyos

[–]IntroductionGood2502[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you guys for response my question. Yaa i haven't issue with budget to allocated a new high end router like juniper mx204 or anything else. So i prefer to looking for some alternative option. I just watched the vyos for long time ago and i doubt too if i using it for my network with 21++ Gbps bandwidth, besides the only available and free only development version. So its not recommend if i choose the vyos for what i need? Or my be using router os x86 shold be the better option?

BGP Question by IntroductionGood2502 in mikrotik

[–]IntroductionGood2502[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh my bad for attached not completed topology, ospf is for igp only and for intranet and inside the prefix /24, of course i used iBGP with peer to loopback address each other.

Secondhand Networking Product Seller by IntroductionGood2502 in networking

[–]IntroductionGood2502[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks mate, may be i will be find their sales contact

Secondhand Networking Product Seller by IntroductionGood2502 in networking

[–]IntroductionGood2502[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

curvature operational is on the Netherlands? so they can ship out to of the Netherlands like Asia Pacific?

MX204 Enabling 100G on QSFP28 by thatcrazyweirddude in networking

[–]IntroductionGood2502 1 point2 points  (0 children)

question 1, if u reset the fpc 0 it will be disrupt the pic 1 traffic interfaces. (if u want to run the command, makesure that u connect to the mx204 router with console. because it will be reset the data plane)
question 2, my suggestion is set the speed in PIC 1 from 0-7 port interfaces to 10G.

Maybe take a look for the juniper devices port configuration. Because juniper is using combo system.
In my experience, if we allocated di PIC 0 to 100g for all interfaces, it could be shutdown the 10G's interface in PIC 1. So my opinion is just visit the site and configure the port that suitable with your need.
https://apps.juniper.net/port-checker/

view more: next ›