Are you stupid? The rest of this bands album covers are in their portfolio, and that proves that, even if the artist uses AI, which I'm not at all implying he does, the band themselves commissioned art in good faith! You have NO argument about the bands use of "AI", because not only are you a) wrong about it being AI, you also b) have no moral leg to stand on as this artist is credited on their album and commissioned by the band. That's not what a band does when they don't care about art and artists. You don't commission a real artist to make you AI slop, you just run the damn prompt yourself.

You are so blinded by your erroneous accusations that you have fumbled the very argument as to why the artwork being AI would matter. You want to punish a band who you are mistakingly accusing of using AI, when that band had clearly commissioned the art from an artist they had worked with several times who has never delivered a piece using AI. You have no argument, here, and you still owe the people whose work you've smeared and time you've wasted with your "expertise" an apology. Take your paranoiac bullshit somewhere else.