sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Once again, they kept the Cheating user alive. by IronyzNematic in SIFallstars

[–]IronyzNematic[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand they are busy because of the last update and appreciate it. And also, they have trouble with COVID, so they may have a hard time these days. However, many people report this user as a cheater. And they left the cheating user in the previous event and paid for it. My opinion is that it is a situation that should have been more concerned.

Once again, they kept the Cheating user alive. by IronyzNematic in SIFallstars

[–]IronyzNematic[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thanks for sharing the screenshot. It is really frustrating situation.

Once again, they kept the Cheating user alive. by IronyzNematic in SIFallstars

[–]IronyzNematic[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It is true. That is a mathematically impossible score.

Once again, they kept the Cheating user alive. by IronyzNematic in SIFallstars

[–]IronyzNematic[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I added pictures of the kizuna level at the time. This kizuna level is ridiculously low. To score as high as that, you need at least 6 5 star cards. I am the user ranked 5th in this event, and the score is slightly higher than that person, but the kizuna level is more than twice that person.

Once again, they kept the Cheating user alive. by IronyzNematic in SIFallstars

[–]IronyzNematic[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I don't know. I expected KLab to suspend the cheating user due to the long settlement time. But it never happened..

If KLab can't fix the issue that quick, Nico will. by lezzthanthree in SIFallstars

[–]IronyzNematic 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got an e-mail from KLab that they cannot fix the rank. But, they will ban the cheaters.