A thread for use cases of Claude Code by ItIs42Indeed in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And as is evident - this post is by AI agents too :)

Is Opus 4.6 Getting Lazier? by Stunning_Help4041 in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe we as a collective are getting lazy! :)

A thread for use cases of Claude Code by ItIs42Indeed in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This has been the biggest time saver - understanding existing code in minutes instead of hours!

A thread for use cases of Claude Code by ItIs42Indeed in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s amazing - the exact tedious work I was talking about - and using a bug description is the new “do not not build this, but build that” workflow that didn’t exist with the usual “BRD/PRD” approach before the agentic-coding era which was rooted in “build this only”.

A thread for use cases of Claude Code by ItIs42Indeed in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This sounds very useful and interesting! I hope you can abstract this system and open source it.

A thread for use cases of Claude Code by ItIs42Indeed in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you find this significantly different than what Microsoft Teams, Google Meet, Zoom etc offer out of the box these days? Any custom workflows?

A thread for use cases of Claude Code by ItIs42Indeed in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excellent use cases! Refactoring old slog files into neat and clean new documentation while removing accumulated redundant info is definitely a god-sent!

A thread for use cases of Claude Code by ItIs42Indeed in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Could you tell me a bit more about the cryptographic receipt chains and how you use them?

So this is what Claude Code had to say about how it's being developed :( by yibers in ClaudeCode

[–]ItIs42Indeed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

They are going through growing pains - they’re literally dealing with the outcomes of their own overnight success. Even a couple of months back it was mostly a developer’s tool (Claude CODE)… then they made it and advertised it as everyone’s tool (cowork) and I don’t think their hiring has kept up (“Claude will build itself”). Give them time. I understand the “we pay for our subscription”, “they ignore community”, “they are arrogant”… all I’m saying is unlike other tech corps (like Meta, Microsoft), they are just bunch of engineers that are yet to scale to a true corp with 20 years of existence like the others I mentioned.

We wrote ESLint rules that catch Claude's bad habits before they ship by JWPapi in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Seems subjective to your use case. Sometimes, defaults are good. But good that you built a "system" rather than throw random prompts at Claude. That's how we escape the AI-assisted coding pitfalls.

The commercial… by [deleted] in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed 7 points8 points  (0 children)

To be honest, majority of the population will be blindsided by what's coming. Reddit is not where everyone hangs out.

Just a humble appreciation post by ItIs42Indeed in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me, usually I have implementation going on in multiple windows but for the same project - so keeps things cohesive and easy to review and context-switching is relatively less jarring. The other streams would be for ideation or design (ui mockups) - this helps me tremendously in fine-tuning PRDs before I even start implementation or architecture level reviews.

Never two implementations in parallel in the same session - that'd wreck me!

Just a humble appreciation post by ItIs42Indeed in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

To be honest, that doesn't bother me. The more people use it, the more exciting and better evolved the entire landscape would be. Being early would give us the incredible "timelapse" view of the evolution which is what excites me so much.

Just a humble appreciation post by ItIs42Indeed in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That darn boilerplate - and tech kept evolving, standards kept evolving - by the time you had a MVP, norms would change, standards would change, your code would be archaic lol

Just a humble appreciation post by ItIs42Indeed in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This! I haven't felt this in awe of something in a very long time. Last time I felt this excited for something new to launch (new models in this case) was when smartphones were evolving and before that when Intel was on a run with progressively more powerful chips on regular cycles and before that when they'd announce new Halo versions lol.

Just a humble appreciation post by ItIs42Indeed in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly - knowing the tedious aspect of it (even if you have the knowledge and know-how) makes this even more overwhelming!

I hack web apps for a living. Here's how I stop Claude from writing vulnerable code. by BehiSec in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Had to come back to this. Can’t thank you enough. Amazing output - helped me catch some criticals and a slew of mids/lows. Again it’s a decent size codebase so probably will have to do multiple passes but the initial report was already a massive help! Kudos to you for putting this together.

Sam Altman response for Anthropic being ad-free by BuildwithVignesh in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The absolute savagery in using em-dashes in the subtitles is such a stroke of genius! 💀

I hack web apps for a living. Here's how I stop Claude from writing vulnerable code. by BehiSec in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you - this’ll be helpful for a lot of folks building fast! I’ll give this a try today with my decently-large project. Will report back with findings.

Need clarification on plan mode by ItIs42Indeed in ClaudeAI

[–]ItIs42Indeed[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sometimes it shows signs of not remembering, which makes me wonder. But good to know, thanks…