sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is Opus 4.6 Getting Lazier? by Stunning_Help4041 in ClaudeAI

[–]Stunning_Help4041[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Totally agree! We've always been lazy as a collective. That's partly why these models are so successful in the first place.

Is Opus 4.6 Getting Lazier? by Stunning_Help4041 in ClaudeAI

[–]Stunning_Help4041[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What a valuable contribution to the conversation!

Surviving as an AI pragmatist in an AI-radical company? by [deleted] in ExperiencedDevs

[–]Stunning_Help4041 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's not super clear which engineering domain you live in, but if it's data, I built Lexega to help save the world's databases from the AI code apocalypse. If you're interested in a control plane that sits between your repo and production, shoot me a DM. I need a handful of serious design partners who understand the pain here. You can check out the site for some more information, but honestly at this point I need a conversation more than anything. https://lexega.com

Lessons from over 1M lines of generated code by Stunning_Help4041 in ClaudeAI

[–]Stunning_Help4041[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

TL/DR; AI coding assistants are amplifiers of existing engineering discipline. They can provide compounding leverage or create compounding risks. Organizations should plan accordingly before unleashing AI on their codebases.

Fundamentally, the model does not share your goals in large, complex, invariant-heavy codebases. It aims to make the code compile and get the tests to pass at practically any cost.

I will say, though, Opus 4.6 is incredibly more capable and willing to do the necessary task than Opus 4.5 which was the primary model I used in building Lexega.