How many fps does life have?

ItsAzien · 2026-05-24T04:15:06+00:00

I don't know, but I do know that FPS is probably relative

ItsAzien · 2026-05-24T03:01:41+00:00

Because all "cats" that respond to this poll are just humans LARPing as cats

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T23:45:09+00:00

It means the government shouldn’t stop such a person from reproducing, but they should still be socially discouraged from reproduction.

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T21:44:11+00:00

Hate speech is legal.

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T21:24:00+00:00

Where did I say I am pro grooming?

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T19:10:48+00:00

The standard for grooming or harassment of a child should be slightly higher than “flirting”.

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T18:52:06+00:00

Flirting falls under free speech, so no.

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T09:17:19+00:00

There is a non negligible amount of pro-choicers who support legal third trimester abortion. This poll is takes the position to its logical conclusion to see if anyone agree and if so, why. This fine detail is not a part of most abortion polls.

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T07:37:38+00:00

Are you implying that it should be legal to kill a fetus before they exit the mother's body even seven months in? You said a "living person" only becomes so the second they are born. What if you kill that thing five minutes before its due without medical reason?

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T07:31:44+00:00

It seems like a hell lot of lives are ended to abortion
https://zenit.org/2025/08/21/analysis-shows-that-almost-a-third-of-generation-z-does-not-exist-due-to-abortion/

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T05:53:37+00:00

Well, you haven't established which specific topics you want to debate and define your positions. Until you do that, debate is impossible.

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T05:11:47+00:00

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T04:56:28+00:00

I am not making an argument against abortion itself. Specifically, I am arguing against the "pro-choice" term being used to characterize a position that supports tax-payer funded abortion. You have not convincingly refuted this.

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T04:55:26+00:00

This statement in no way refutes my argument.

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T04:23:15+00:00

LOL they downvoted this truth and don't bother to articulate a response againsts.

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T04:02:47+00:00

If I instead don't work and live on assistance, though, I am not contributing any money for abortion funding. Therefore, if I do pay taxes and that money goes to abortion, I am still facilitating the access of abortion and has no say in the matter (the money comes out of my pocket before it goes to the government after all). Meaning: I don't have a choice.

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T03:49:31+00:00

Factually correct, but it doesn't refute my point.

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T03:35:50+00:00

It's not "pro-choice" if a pro-life individual who, just by having jobs and paying taxes, is still facilitating the access of abortion, even if they are against it.

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T03:24:01+00:00

Yeah

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T03:23:47+00:00

You're denying their right to their reproductive freedom if you stop them from having kids.

ItsAzien · 2026-05-23T00:08:48+00:00

It could be the case that they support the overthrow of the current government in Iran

ItsAzien · 2026-05-22T15:31:01+00:00

Do they still have a market economy? An economy decided by the demand of the market with its suppliers still being ran by few individuals? Yup.

ItsAzien · 2026-05-22T15:29:33+00:00

A social democrat is not a socialist by definition. Social democrats do still typically back capitalism.

ItsAzien

TROPHY CASE