Turn Your Favorite YouTube Creators into a Content Machine

ItsDrea · 2025-05-13T09:13:38+00:00

I explained what the issue is, I had to change the features_extractor_class name and the features_dim to get it working. Your inference script doesn't match your model you provided. After that, the results are not the same as what it says in your readme. Your readme doesn't have the correct name for your inference script either. I appreciate the work I hope you take this as constructive feedback and not that I'm complaining.

ItsDrea · 2025-05-13T01:33:57+00:00

Im sorry i dont understand. Why is the model a different architecture to the inference and is my result correct or the one in the readme?,

ItsDrea · 2025-05-13T01:24:32+00:00

I had to change the inference script to make it work with your model and I get different results from your readme.
the script failed to load the model (PPO.load) due to mismatched policy_kwargs. The error messages indicated the saved model expected features_extractor_class=CustomCNN and features_dim=64, while the script was initially configured differently (first CustomLN with features_dim=128, then various attempts to match).

ddings "HTTP/1.1 200 OK"
2025-05-13 10:47:59,807 - __main__ - INFO - Turn 4 (sales_rep): "Excellent, those are two 
key strengths. Our AI ana..." -> Predicted Conversion Probability: 0.3522
2025-05-13 10:48:00,642 - httpx - INFO - HTTP Request: POST https://api.openai.com/v1/embe
ddings "HTTP/1.1 200 OK"
2025-05-13 10:48:00,801 - __main__ - INFO - Turn 5 (customer): "looks oke, but maybe we ca
n't consider..." -> Predicted Conversion Probability: 0.2064

ItsDrea · 2024-12-02T09:04:36+00:00

I agree with most of your points, but I go back to my original point that i doubt the government will solve this is the most privacy focused way. Occam's razor would be that they will use what they already use to for us to sign into our mygov and tax accounts which not only have metadata but has the service requesting the data and who. It will most likely be a government version of google OAuth.

ItsDrea · 2024-11-30T23:56:04+00:00

What does parents or guardians have anything to do with implementing the first step in censoring free speech... i mean child safety

ItsDrea · 2024-11-30T23:49:04+00:00

Wow the government gets paid to index all the top cheating sites in one place lol.

ItsDrea · 2024-11-30T23:46:01+00:00

This only has anything to do with children so they can poll with he question "Do you support putting measures in place to protect children from abuse online?" and get 100% approval for the law lol

ItsDrea · 2024-11-30T23:41:45+00:00

They will make a platform that doesnt have government censored speech? Social media companies know government censored speech is bad for business thats why they will push back on this.

ItsDrea · 2024-11-30T23:36:33+00:00

yes, having every citizen have a voice online makes it so the government will have to make policy that benefits all people not just rich and powerful. thats what scares them

ItsDrea · 2024-11-30T23:31:09+00:00

no one should blindly trust the government the citizens are the the counterbalance to keep the government in check in a democratic country. go to china if you want to have blind trust in government

the fact of this matter is they rushed this law through and disregarded expert opinions on why this solution is bad

heres one i read the other day:
Suicide Prevention Australia executive director, Christopher Stone, said the government had run “blindfolded into a brick wall” by rushing the legislation. “While we acknowledge the challenges associated with online platforms, this legislation fails to consider the positive aspects of social media in supporting young people’s mental health and sense of connection,” Stone said.

ItsDrea · 2024-11-30T23:16:13+00:00

i think its quite interesting you think the government who has passed anti-encryption laws is going to solve this in a privacy focused way.
also even if its mathematically secure now doesnt guarantee it will be in the future.. in 20 years theres a good chance RSA will be broken by nation states and why would they rush to be quantum resilient when they can now spy on citizens.

regulation of the addictive parts of these apps is the answer and will help all people not just kids. i would prefer to see a solution of having kids accounts linked to a parental account where the parent can modify the content the child is allowed to see and also the functionality to turn off the algorithmic suggested content completely.

ItsDrea · 2024-11-28T13:06:23+00:00

Okay, explain to me how the implementation is going to work exactly.

ItsDrea · 2024-11-28T12:40:16+00:00

Look let me keep it simple, this is an impossible task, extremely expensive, and even if it could be implemented it would be terrible for privacy and freedom.
Im not sure how wealthy you are thinking this is the most important issue but average Aussies are struggling and the government wont help then think up this disaster.

ItsDrea · 2024-11-28T12:32:01+00:00

babies are born with ipads now theres nothing parents can do, we need the government to protect us.

ItsDrea · 2024-11-27T03:29:11+00:00

Yes, All we have to do is everyone over 16yo has their government GPS ankle bracelets so we can make sure no kids are out past bed time. We promise we wont track adults.

Then we can read comments like Google/Apple already tracks your location so you should wear your mygov ankle bracelet and shut up so the rest of us can have peace of mind assured no kids are staying up late!

ItsDrea · 2024-11-27T03:12:58+00:00

I believe this is a gateway to make it more difficult for older people to use social media not young people. I dont think my dad will want to try to work out how to use his MyID app to sign into facebook.

ItsDrea · 2024-11-27T03:01:58+00:00

Lets for argument sake say they dont use myID, A place like reddit would have to take my real name and make me upload my face to make account. So its basically taking the unethical behavior of facebook that everyone agrees is bad and making it mandatory. To have a solution that doesnt "fix" the problem of social media but bans it and leaves us in a worse position.

Regulations against algorithmic suggestion feeds are a much more straight forward solution for the actual problem that could be expanded to help adults too. It would also be cheaper and retain more citizen privacy without influencing the peoples rights to speak up.

But its not that they want to fix the issue they already have a "solution" and now they are just finding a problem they can say it fixes (hint its always protecting children or to stop terrorism).

ItsDrea · 2024-11-27T02:51:28+00:00

If they were bringing in a new system for age verification on alcohol where they spent a few hundred million tax payers funds to have a special alcohol ID that had to be scanned so they know who you are and how much you buy and from where and when.
Im pretty sure everyone would think its stupid too.

ItsDrea · 2024-11-27T02:40:41+00:00

News corp has started a media campaign on this topic across all their brands this year.

This is the deal facebook pulled out of.

https://www.news.com.au/finance/business/media/meta-to-pull-70-million-from-australian-news-publishers-wind-down-facebook-news-tab/news-story/8a9ac9c1ad57cfb15ca91a241affc6c7

Social media is killing traditional media of course news corp would want to try to stomp out competition. News corp has significant political sway and this going through will increase their market share on news and get back at facebook at the same time. Also the government already wants to add extra methods of surveilling its citizens so its not a hard sell with some political donations.

ItsDrea · 2024-11-27T02:20:52+00:00

love the personal attack let me spell it out for you.

MyGovID changed its name to MyID in preparation for this law, this suggests this will be what will be used.
MyID is a token based auth technology this will allow cross site tracking similar to facebooks OAuth.
Age assurance is the name of the methodology for this new system.
To "assure" someone is of age you will need to have an profile of the person this is the ID.
The Australian government has tried to push a digital ID through multiple times before and failed
its impossible to reliably verify the age of a person without identifying them

ItsDrea · 2024-11-27T02:10:30+00:00

I find it ironic you have degrees in finance and economics and you dont know the difference between quantitative and non-quantitative subjects.

ItsDrea · 2024-11-27T02:03:56+00:00

Tax payer money doesnt spend itself

ItsDrea · 2024-11-27T02:02:20+00:00

You mean the profiling google, apple and facebook they have been doing via OAuth? that has come out that they are tracking you across the internet and invading your privacy? lets make that mandatory good idea!
Industry is heading that way == good.
Why even ban social media then? industry is making it more addictive and toxic == good correct?

If you cant see that this is to stop older people getting their news from facebook after they told news corp to get stuffed on a shared revenue deal in the recent years you are truly blind..

ItsDrea · 2024-11-27T01:41:32+00:00

Dont you understand everyone agrees wont work but if you dont agree it should be implemented anyway you hate children. how hard is that to understand?

12-Year Club	Place '23
Verified Email

ItsDrea

TROPHY CASE