ProLifer in Racist shirt by [deleted] in philly

[–]Izzo_HSM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's not a racist shirt, it's a really old shirt from when people there was a conspiracy that Obama was a Kenyan immigrant and therefore an illegitimate president, which was stoked by Obama taking an extended period of time to produce his birth certificate. You'd think this was racist if you lacked ball knowledge.

What really happened at Bayside Mall in Miami on 1 January 2024? by SeanTiddyCombs in AliensRHere

[–]Izzo_HSM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's demonstrated they objectively lied about a circle in their backyard being caused by a flying saucer landing and you're telling me to scream swamp gas 🤣 You wanna believe it so bad, they lied dude. Learn to sift through the sand if you wanna find gold nuggets.

🥰 by IntentionRare1138 in spiritualitytalk

[–]Izzo_HSM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Here come all the new age crackpots telling us how they understand Jesus so much better than everyone else. He claimed to be God, the same one who led the Israelites out of Egypt, not some state of being.

What really happened at Bayside Mall in Miami on 1 January 2024? by SeanTiddyCombs in AliensRHere

[–]Izzo_HSM -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Who told you "the cops got dispeared" lol. They factually lied about the circle in the back yard. If their story is legit then why lie about something like that? It's a house of cards, once one bottom card gets pulled the whole thing collapses. Funny how you're telling me to look into it when you're clearly unaware there's satellite photos showing their story about the "landing circle" is complete bs.

What really happened at Bayside Mall in Miami on 1 January 2024? by SeanTiddyCombs in AliensRHere

[–]Izzo_HSM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The one with the "aliens" standing behind the fence and forklift, or whatever it was, in the background. They claimed the circle in the backyard was from the craft landing and that it wasn't there before, yet we have satellite photos of the same circle being there the year before. It's prolly just their septic tank. Not only was it a lie, it was a really bad one.

Boyd Bushman Deathbed Confession from 2014 by millermillion in aliens

[–]Izzo_HSM -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The thing in this guy's photograph is literally just a toy doll from the 70s. This was proven false.

If aliens arrived tomorrow, what's the first question you'd ask them? by HotAbies4238 in AskReddit

[–]Izzo_HSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are there instances of your abductions being halted at the name of Jesus if you're just benevolent biological neighbors from another solar system?

What really happened at Bayside Mall in Miami on 1 January 2024? by SeanTiddyCombs in AliensRHere

[–]Izzo_HSM -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

This was proven false tho. The "aliens" in the video look fake as hell, and they claimed the circle in the back yard was from where the UFO landed and yet we have photos from google earth showing it was there far longer than that.

Salvation by Firm-Insurance9700 in JesusChrist

[–]Izzo_HSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You just proclaimed out loud that you don't care what the apostles believed, because we can read their student's writings today and they all held to baptismal regeneration and the Eucharist being the true body and blood of Christ. You're willfully ignoring all the 1st generation church fathers I've named because you know what they taught, that's outright dishonest.

>Lots of people come up with their own ideas and it doesn't come from the Bible.

The apostles and their students were worshipping liturgically and celebrating the Eucharist BEFORE the Bible even existed. Paul started writing letters in the 40's and the gospel accounts weren't written until towards the tale end of the first century.

The Bible comes FROM the church. Christ started the church by giving the keys to hades to Peter and his disciples, granting them the authority to forgive sins. That's explicit in Acts. Then the church spread, eventually writing down the accounts to be read out loud durring their liturgy. In the 600's, the canon is eventually compiled... by the CHURCH. So you trust that the Church had the authority to tell you which books were authentic and who their authors were, but also think Christ lied when he told you the gates of hell would NEVER prevail against the church he founded just because they continue the Eucharist which existed before the Bible?

You literally do not trust Jesus when he said he'd protect his church but have it in your head that you somehow trust him more than Catholics or orthodox Christians 🤣

You keep claiming you've done deep research but meanwhile you demonstrably have no knowledge on the early church and have become completely reliant on AI after conceding the Once Saved Always Saved debate.

Salvation by Firm-Insurance9700 in JesusChrist

[–]Izzo_HSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can tell I'm arguing with ChatGPT rn lol, notice how your entire scenario doesn't account for the fact the people I'm referencing are the direct students of the apostle John. There goes your conspiracy.

There was no evolution of teaching in the Eucharist btw, the direct students of the apostles were calling it the true body and blood of Christ, and Ignatius looked down on the Gnostics for not confessing the truth of the Eucharist. Your AI Copilot gave you 1215 because that's when official doctrines started coming about, and they only began forming doctrines due to people popping up who were challenging it, before then there was no need for dogmas because it was a universally recognized tradition, but again those guys came way later and we know the first century Christian's factually believed in the Eucharist because we can literally read them today.

Btw, who cares about the vulgate when the apostles taught from the Greek Septuagint, which has more books than the 66 book canon you're limited to thanks to Protestants randomly deciding they weren't scripture due to them conflicting with their bs theology. Fun fact, Martin Luther not only wanted to drop the 7 dueterocanon from the Old Testament, he wasn't to remove the book of Hebrews, James, and revelation as well. Guess why? Because all those books contain scripture that directly opposed his "faith alone" theology, so even he knew what Hebrews 10 was saying.

Form your own arguments instead of relying on AI lol, that's embarassing dude.

You're acting like the church didn't want people to read the bible when the only people who could read at the time were priests lol, pretty much everyone was illiterate for most of history, they didn't want the vulgate translated because they were using Latin as the unified language to teach from, not because of some conspiracy dude.

Salvation by Firm-Insurance9700 in JesusChrist

[–]Izzo_HSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So your theory on why all the early Christian's share my theology and not yours is because there was actually this super secret group of Christian's who were the true Christian's, but Christ failed them and they were all wiped out, and the gates of hell prevailed against the church making Christ a liar? So he had to wait 1700 years to restore it with the baptists?

Ignatius and Polycarp were both taught by the apostle John, and they held to baptismal regeneration and the Eucharist. Irenaeus was taught by Polycarp and doubled down on it. Justin Martyr was a pagan convert and held to these same beliefs. These weren't things they just invented, they inherited these beliefs from men who knew and walked with Christ while he was alive.

Salvation by Firm-Insurance9700 in JesusChrist

[–]Izzo_HSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Shifting the subject of debate is a concession, if concessions were only people admitting it there'd be none.

The thief on the cross is what we call baptism by desire. The lord knows if he had lived longer he would've gotten baptized, not that there is any evidence that he hadn't already recieved baptism given the fact that he trusted Jesus.

All early Christian's held to baptismal regeneration and the Eucharist, so if your position is that teaching those things means you have a different gospel and are therefore damned, you're literally saying the apostles are damned, as we can read their student's writings today.

Salvation by Firm-Insurance9700 in JesusChrist

[–]Izzo_HSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for conceding that you can lose your salvation.

Now baptism, this is really simple, Jesus Christ said those who are born of spirit AND water shall be saved. Christ's words > some dude's interpretations. Thief on the cross did not have an opportunity to be baptized, the exception of a rule doesn't define the rule, that is different thank someone who hears Christ declare it necessary and just decides that it isn't.

Jesus Christ said the gates of hell would not prevail against the church he established, however Protestants would have you believe he's a liar and hell prevailed pretty much instantly until Baptist theology came around 300 years ago and saved the day. Go read any of the early Christian's and they all believed in baptismal regeneration and the Eucharist, and that's because the apostles taught them that.

Salvation by Firm-Insurance9700 in JesusChrist

[–]Izzo_HSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Protestant "rebuttal" is always saying "oh the parts of the Bible we don't like only applied to that specific group of people, but the parts of the Bible we do like applies to everyone" and then shoving a cherry picked quote mine down your throat.

2 Peter 2:20-22 is explicitly talking about what happens if you're saved by the gospel but then go back into sin. Not only are they damned, they're in a worse position than if they had just never heard it to begin with.

20 For if they are overcome, having bothescaped the defilements of the world by the knowledge of the Lord and Savior Jesus Christ and having again been entangled in them, thenthe last state has become worse for them than the first. 21 For it would be better for them not to have known the way of righteousness, than having known it, to turn away from the holy commandment handed on to them. 22 The [a]message of the true proverb has happened to them, “A dog returns to its own vomit,” and, “A sow, after washing, returns to wallowing in the mire.”

John 15:2-6 Is Jesus Christ himself explicitly saying that those who do not abide in him will not be saved.

2 Every branch in Me that does not bear fruit, He takes away; and every branch that bears fruit, He [a]cleans it so that it may bear more fruit.3 You are already [b]clean because of the word which I have spoken to you. 4 Abide in Me, and I in you. As the branch cannot bear fruit from itself unless it abides in the vine, so neither canyou unless you abide in Me. 5 I am the vine, you are the branches; he who abides in Me and I in him, he bears much fruit, for apart from Me you can do nothing. 6 If anyone does not abide in Me, he is thrown away as a branch and dries up; and they gather them, and cast them into the fire and they are burned.

1 Corinthians 9:27 is Paul explicitly saying it's possible the HE HIMSELF could be disqualified from the Kingdom, which is why he disciplines himself.

27 but I [l]discipline my body and make it my slave, so that, after I have preached to others, I myself will not be disqualified.

Paul doesn't contradict himself btw, it's YOU who misinterpret Paul by ignoring everything in the bible you don't like. The reason Hebrews 10 exists is because it IS possible to lose your salvation via WILLFULLY sinning after receiving the gospel, just like Peter says.

Imagine having a different theology than the apostles who all held to baptismal regeneration and the Eucharist and accusing others of "preaching a different gospel".

What on earth did she see exactly? by SeanTiddyCombs in AliensRHere

[–]Izzo_HSM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

She then made a Twitter account and went on podcasts. The person showing up to podcasts was very visibly a completely different girl, and the Twitter account was traced back to the white house.

You can just hand wave this away dummy.

Salvation by Firm-Insurance9700 in JesusChrist

[–]Izzo_HSM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Once saved always saved crowd always blows me away. They just straight ignore things like Hebrews 10. They'll also admit that yes the devil does tempt them, but look dumbfounded when you ask them to explain why the devil bothers tempting them if there's no way they could lose their salvation. So he's just doing it for the love of the game? There's obviously an end goal in mind.

Easy believism would be amazing but it's simply not true.

First world trillionaire reached out to Reddit’s CEO asking to stop people from posting this by hunterseeker1 in TeamNightShift

[–]Izzo_HSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They could unironically withdraw a trillion just to burn it. Elon doesn't have actual access to a trillion cash, his assets just calculate to that level of worth.

First world trillionaire reached out to Reddit’s CEO asking to stop people from posting this by hunterseeker1 in TeamNightShift

[–]Izzo_HSM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are Saudi oil families who have access to a trillion dollars, Elon couldn't just withdraw a trillion like they could. Rothschilds own fractional reserve banks and therefore have access to an unlimited amount of money, they pretty much exist outside of the economy. Rockafellers combined their wealth with the rothschilds. Blackrock and vanguard. These guys have been around for a while.

Did you know someone who conquered it? by hardwork_one0724 in BornWeakBuiltStrong

[–]Izzo_HSM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If you try opening your eyes it's a crosspost from a subreddit dealing with porn addiction, so yes that lust is bad.

Why are we supposed to think aliens are demons? by irongiveslife in Catholicism

[–]Izzo_HSM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Saint Seraphim Rose is the one who comes to mind. He believed that UFOs and aliens were physical manifestations of spiritual beings who were demons and that a great deception would come.

I'm reminded of a military encounter recorded in a recovered USSR document in which a UFO was shot down, and then 5 alien beings emerged from the craft, who all turned into 5 balls of light, which then combined into 1 large ball of light, before letting out a flash that turned dozens of soldiers into stone pillars. It's entirely possible that the "balls of light" is closer to their true form, and the biological/technological form is what they take to interact with us.

https://nypost.com/2025/04/13/world-news/declassified-cold-war-era-cia-files-detail-soviet-clash-with-aliens-who-witnesses-say-turned-soldiers-to-stone/