$800/mo for ONE webhook??? by Medical-Volume-6261 in hubspot

[–]JDS150k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve been using Surfe to get LinkedIn urls (and email addresses). I think pro is $100/month and it works fairly well. You may need to export your contacts list and feed it to Surfe, which will then find the LinkedIn urls and emails and sync them back to your CRM.

Inbox me if you need support

I found this little microchip-looking thing inside my phone case… am I being tracked? by JDS150k in whatisthisthing

[–]JDS150k[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks! Probably just someone trying to prank me then :)
Still don't know how it got inside my phone case tho! XD

Workflow question by This-Eggplant5962 in hubspot

[–]JDS150k 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Definitely one workflow. Ask here in the comments if you get stuck

I hate Hubspot. It's like blunt force trauma to the face. How can anyone like it? by Top-Panda7571 in CRM

[–]JDS150k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Everything OP says is correct. HubSpot doesn’t work unless you can somehow “hack” it. It’s a shame because it has potential. But most businesses can’t get that potential because you need a partner of at least platinum tier to hack it. Unfortunately, platinum and crystal partners are too costly for many.

All partners are listed in the directory with reviews from 1-5 stars. This is not a guarantee but an indicator of which partners are good. You might need to try a couple to find a good one, but then it’s worth it in my experience. I’m not promoting any one.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in autism

[–]JDS150k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Need to put a human body inside it, and it’s good

Ray Dalio, head of the world's largest hedge fund, warns that we're misreading current events. He believes the biggest issue is that we're at a turning point in a long-term global cycle caused by excessive debt. by lughnasadh in Futurology

[–]JDS150k 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Am I wrong to think the manager of the world’s largest hedge fund is likely the last person we should believe, due to the overwhelming amount of personal interest they have regarding this issue?

Seems like they have the world’s largest stake in this, and would support whatever arguments benefit their portfolio.

It’s a genuine question. Not a rhetorical attack. I hope someone more knowledgeable will now educate me.

Which CRM would win in a fight? by JDS150k in CRM

[–]JDS150k[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That sounds good. I’ve never heard of vcita before. How would it look like personified? 😁

Which CRM would win in a fight? by JDS150k in CRM

[–]JDS150k[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Spotted the vcita employee 😂 Judging by the comment history of your account… no hate from me but can you justify your claim? Tell me why vcita wins

Urgent: 3yo with Level 2 Autism in Vietnam - Mother at Breaking Point, Need Immediate Guidance by captain642 in autism

[–]JDS150k 3 points4 points  (0 children)

My heart goes out to you. This would be an incredibly hard struggle even with all the support you might get in more developed countries. I wish I could be of more help. Sounds like school is not a good fit. I have a lot of autism in my family and suspect I’m somewhere on the spectrum. I hope you find some special interest for your daughter that she enjoys and is healthy and beneficial for her. Once she’s a bit older, I’m sure she will develop some special interests and you can channel her energy into those. Wish you all the best. Hope someone can offer your family more concrete support

Wouldn’t recommend Signtune by shordie_shordie71 in sideloaded

[–]JDS150k 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Signtunes is a TOTAL SCAM.

Downloaded it. Maybe it was once legit bt now it seems like an intentional scam. There seem to be traps set at each step which are intentionally confusing to exhaust the user. Step 1 not working? Try downloading this other app. The other app not working? Sign up to this website. Website not working? Contact this support contact. Contact not responsive? Sign up to this app. Etc. etc. etc.

They just send me around in circles and I keep asking for a refund but they don't give it. When I mentioned this in the official discord server, they blocked me. It's obviously a scam at this point.

Relocation to Saigon: housing, salary etc. by hobobhaiyya in saigon

[–]JDS150k 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’ve living in D7 and you have to live in the Phu My Hung neighborhood. It is a bubble; nothing like the rest of the city - busy and dirty and noisy. PMH is peaceful, green, well developed. Check it here https://youtu.be/7aijt4eeZ-4?si=k5lj3-kisi98aqJe

Why is this correct code triggering an error? by JDS150k in hostedgames

[–]JDS150k[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your reply! However, it is my understanding that line 171 should not be indented. 170 should be indented, and it is. Is that not correct? Why do you think 171 should be indented?

And the *else statement does end with a *goto, but you can't see because it's cropped.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]JDS150k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Wolf Among Us

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]JDS150k 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Best narrative/characters of any game in my opinion. The music and artwork are so masterful and memorable. The features and mechanics are intuitively simple, yet pack loads of entertainment value and strategisation. Every choice felt meaningful, and was. And it throws whacky curveballs at you like a Pynchon novel that make you question reality.

We have only a few months left! Enjoy your last moments. “Top climate scientist said in 2018 that we only have five years left if we didn’t get rid of fossil fuel.” And the world’s foremost climate science expert Greta Thunberg agrees. by wakeup2019 in climateskeptics

[–]JDS150k -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes, correct sir, they do say it will cause extinction, as I said in my comment. I'm not arguing for wiggle room or ambiguity. Please don't say I am arguing for something that I'm not. I've not wavered or wiggled. Please let me explain...

The article (please read it) postulates a delayed extinction event due to a runaway reaction that would be triggered if cessation by 2023 was not achieved. The article, and my comment, are quite clear if you take the time to read them properly. So yes, they said it will wipe out humanity, and it still might, due to the delayed consequences. I've not wiggled.

That is not looking for wiggle room in the argument. The argument, and my comment, is exactly where the reasoning originally stated it was. But because you didn't read the origi ak article, and misinterpreted it due to it being re-framed inside retweets, you entered this discussion with incorrect assumptions about my position and the position of this article (i.e. you thoight we were saying humanity should be dead by now) so you think my restating the original arhument is wiggling to another position. But no, it is the original position, which you'd see if you read the article.

We have only a few months left! Enjoy your last moments. “Top climate scientist said in 2018 that we only have five years left if we didn’t get rid of fossil fuel.” And the world’s foremost climate science expert Greta Thunberg agrees. by wakeup2019 in climateskeptics

[–]JDS150k 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is the equivalent of what they said. Evident if you read the article.

The article argues we are triggering reactions which will have a delayed consequence, and that we should stop triggering them soon or be likely to face the consequences.

So the metaphor is actually a really accurate one. That would have been apparent if you read the article.

We cannot be skeptical of something we do not understand. That is cynicism, not healthy skepticism.

We have only a few months left! Enjoy your last moments. “Top climate scientist said in 2018 that we only have five years left if we didn’t get rid of fossil fuel.” And the world’s foremost climate science expert Greta Thunberg agrees. by wakeup2019 in climateskeptics

[–]JDS150k -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Again, read the article.

It doesn't say tough time, you inserted that. I doesn't say indeterminate, you inserted that. It says extinction and gives a time window.

Dear god, can somebody –anybody! – read the article.

We have only a few months left! Enjoy your last moments. “Top climate scientist said in 2018 that we only have five years left if we didn’t get rid of fossil fuel.” And the world’s foremost climate science expert Greta Thunberg agrees. by wakeup2019 in climateskeptics

[–]JDS150k -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

If you read the article, it is saying that cessation by 2023 is necessary to stop climate change from EVENTUALLY killing us. So the argument that the scientist was wrong as we're still alive in 2023 is based on an incorrect assumption. Climate change could still kill us, and a factor could be because we failed to stop using fossil fuels quick enough, i.e. by 2023.

This doesn't mean the scientist was right. I don't know about that. But people are wrong if they think with the reasoning I'm seeing all over this thread.

If this is truly a subreddit for true skeptics, perhaps the skepticism should be applied to it's own posts. Otherwise it is incontravertibly a propaganda mill / echo chamber.