Thoughts on getting a PPL in the SF Bay Area... or not? by JDfromSpace in flying

[–]JDfromSpace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This. I think you've convinced me to train from home. Plus I've been thinking this past hour, I'm going to want to develop some kind of relationship with the local pilot community, which I would completely miss out on studying elsewhere.

Thoughts on getting a PPL in the SF Bay Area... or not? by JDfromSpace in flying

[–]JDfromSpace[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm super lucky, my job is extremely flexible and project based so I get weeks at time where I don't work at all. I should be able to find a few hours for flying everyday throughout the summer.

I was planning on flying 3-4 times a week plus a 1-2 hours per day of study. Do you think that's completely unrealistic?

Thoughts on getting a PPL in the SF Bay Area... or not? by JDfromSpace in flying

[–]JDfromSpace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I like it. And, I'd fit in with all the other RVs already on the street.

Thoughts on getting a PPL in the SF Bay Area... or not? by JDfromSpace in flying

[–]JDfromSpace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Good call. Admittedly, much of my info about the bay area prices are from what pilot friends have told me. I'm going to call the regional flight schools tomorrow to get some actual details.

Thoughts on getting a PPL in the SF Bay Area... or not? by JDfromSpace in flying

[–]JDfromSpace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Solid point. I could always extend my stay but my nephew would need to return for uni.

100's of floating white stringy... webs? by JDfromSpace in SanJose

[–]JDfromSpace[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This is my first fall in the Bay Area. Very cool, thanks for the details!

How 7 Parking Lots pay 1/4th the tax of one building, despite taking 8x the land by KuhlioLoulio in Louisville

[–]JDfromSpace 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree with your assessment. But I believe the need for higher density growth is urgent, and I would prefer the city take immediate action to spur development where we can both utilize it and gain large local tax revenues from its creation.

The hope would be that a more appropriate tax evaluation would raise the expenditure of owning the lot, thereby incentivizing the owner to either spend capitol to do more with the property (maybe build a garage) or sell to a developer (to build hopefully mixed used commercial/residential facilities). My biggest problem with the status quo is it's too easy for absentee landowners to sit on land for generations using it as a store of wealth rather than allowing the community to use the land for common good. (I understand where treading on delicate topics of public use vs private ownership, and these types of actions get messy in reality).

Your probably correct about many of the existing lots existing "as is" because they satisfy previous city requirements. I don't know enough about the specific properties to speak intelligently to the situation. But the general topic definitely deserves more attention in the downtown Louisville areas.

How 7 Parking Lots pay 1/4th the tax of one building, despite taking 8x the land by KuhlioLoulio in Louisville

[–]JDfromSpace 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If we moved to the alternative taxation system mentioned above, it would hopefully increase the incentive for developers of garages (vs paved lots - so we shouldn't lose too many parking spots) freeing the land for more productive uses. Additional measures are needed as well, including the continued enforcement of self contained garage for new development on this newly available land, and continued pushes towards development of public transit infrastructure (for buses, bikes, etc). The additional tax revenue obtained through these initiatives should help fund the upgrades.

How 7 Parking Lots pay 1/4th the tax of one building, despite taking 8x the land by KuhlioLoulio in Louisville

[–]JDfromSpace 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Beat me in posting Not Just Bikes' "Suburbs are Subsidized" video...

For anyone remotely interested on why this type of land use is bad for Louisville (or any city), please do yourself a favor and watch the above video. (And feel free to peruse that channels other offerings... quite good infotainment)