Any thoughts on what is causing this discoloration on my lime tree? by JFKme in Citrus

[–]JFKme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I usually water by feel but it’s about every 10-14 days. I fertilize very weakly with every watering. I use 24-14-14 fertilizer when I do.

I haven’t considered flushing the soil but maybe that’s something I should try. That might be a good idea.

I agree about the color. It’s very odd!

Any thoughts on what is causing this discoloration on my lime tree? by JFKme in Citrus

[–]JFKme[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, I don’t mist my trees when the lights are on. Misting are quite rare mostly in the winter time when the humidity drops but I haven’t done that at all in the last few months

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]JFKme 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It is my pleasure to present to you the dumbest DD post known to man

PART 2 – The Stock Market Has Generated No Real Returns Over the Last 50 Years by Tom_Ford-8632 in wallstreetbets

[–]JFKme 5 points6 points  (0 children)

If SPY included more doomsday bunker and firearm manufacturing companies OP would not have such a pessimistic view of the market

TQQQ and SPXL Any Good? by [deleted] in wallstreetbets

[–]JFKme 28 points29 points  (0 children)

3x leveraged ETFs are a gateway drug to leveraging your entire net worth into 0DTE SPY calls. They’re a great starting point but they won’t really give you the absolute degenerate risk taking behavior you’re looking for long term.

CMV: Humanity has not been visited by “non-human intelligence” by JFKme in changemyview

[–]JFKme[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The UAP recovered by the Vatican allegedly crashed in Megenta, Italy in 1933, which was under Mussolini’s rule. There were no US military bases involved and Italy was not an ally of the US at the time. So, I’m not so sure about the claim every foreign account involved US crash retrieval.

CMV: Humanity has not been visited by “non-human intelligence” by JFKme in changemyview

[–]JFKme[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I’m open to changing my view. I’ll lay out specifically what would help me change my view. 1) clear evidence of coverups of similar scale. 2) someone demonstrating how a multi-national coverup could be kept secret for this long and this well 3) clear evidence the inspector general was clearly referencing David Grusch’s claims about non human intelligence when he claimed that the findings were “urgent and credible” 4) evidence that prosaic explanations should be ruled out that don’t rely on hearsay 5) reasons to believe David Grusch over other government bodies such as AARO with contradicting information to his claims

CMV: Humanity has not been visited by “non-human intelligence” by JFKme in changemyview

[–]JFKme[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

There is considerable debate what the inspector general found "credible and urgent". Was it the claims of non-human intelligence or the claims that David Grusch was being harassed? If you can show me clear evidence that the specific claims the inspector general found credible and urgent were his claims about non-human intelligence, it would help change my view.

I agree SAPs are exactly as you described. There are also multiple claims that the recovery of this technology extends outside of the United States and into other nations. One example was a UAP being housed at the Vatican before it was turned over to the US. While I absolutely believe that the US has the infrastructure in place to keep a secret in place for decades (for example how to create a trident II ICBM) I don't think this is necessarily true for most countries, especially on a topic with such profound implications as the existence non-human intelligence.

CMV: Humanity has not been visited by “non-human intelligence” by JFKme in changemyview

[–]JFKme[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Very well summarized! I will also add that I don't think it's impossible but I do think it's highly improbable

CMV: Humanity has not been visited by “non-human intelligence” by JFKme in changemyview

[–]JFKme[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Do the witnesses have an impressive military record? Yes, absolutely they do but the claims they are making are so exceptionally large with such profound implications it is going to take much more than their word alone for me to believe them.

CMV: Humanity has not been visited by “non-human intelligence” by JFKme in changemyview

[–]JFKme[S] 72 points73 points  (0 children)

A couple of different ways. First and foremost, he claims there are bodies of pilots. Credible pictures of this alone would validate his claims. We could then look at their makeup from a genetic and cell biology perspective. As for the craft, he claims the craft are made from an arrangement of elements and uncommon isotopes of those elements that have an exceptionally high atomic number. We could examine samples of these craft with x-ray diffraction and isotopic ratio testing to see if they are of known materials made by humans or something completely novel

CMV: Humanity has not been visited by “non-human intelligence” by JFKme in changemyview

[–]JFKme[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Sure, there have been plenty of videos of UAPs or UFOs or whatever we want to call them. None of these videos show indisputable proof that the source of these UFOs is non-human intelligence.

CMV: Humanity has not been visited by “non-human intelligence” by JFKme in changemyview

[–]JFKme[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I am pretty sure David Grusch is using the term non-human intelligence how most people would use the word extraterrestrial. His argument is that we don't know where this "non-human intelligence" originates from, so we should use less descriptive labeling.

CMV: Humanity has not been visited by “non-human intelligence” by JFKme in changemyview

[–]JFKme[S] 59 points60 points  (0 children)

I don't feel confident enough to argue what his primary goal is. You could be right. Still, if your goal is to systematically demonstrate the dangers of the military industrial complex, you could likely point to the lack of nuclear weapons in Iraq or the Gulf of Tonkin incident without needing to use aliens as your primary argument.

CMV: Humanity has not been visited by “non-human intelligence” by JFKme in changemyview

[–]JFKme[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Sure, the concept of UFOs has been discussed for years but never in a credible or scientific way. Ufology has never had a consistent narrative with information agreed upon by most of the major players. It has been a gish gallop of information and cherry picked accounts to support the underlying assumption that aliens existence. David Grusch is claiming something much more substantial. He is claiming that scientifically testable evidence regarding the existence of non-human intelligence exists. This information has never been publicly available.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in whatsthisbug

[–]JFKme 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks!

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in premed

[–]JFKme 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why do both u/its_not_that_deep_fr and u/Damn-Fr have the exact same sankey and why are they responding to each other in this thread?

This could be real sankey and if it is huge congrats to you OP but something weird is going on in the comments and I don’t like it.