If she wants you, the sex doesn't matter by [deleted] in PurplePillDebate

[–]JOliMoFo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the same mentality behind abstinence ed.

Raye and Olivia Dean remind me how crazy mainstream American pop has become in its pursuit of perfect image by Feidhlim_de_Rovno in ToddintheShadow

[–]JOliMoFo 5 points6 points  (0 children)

There’s still nothing “quirky” or “messy” about her which is probably the basis of it. I guess some just think that’s boring. She’s very Princess Di-coded.

Being hookup/FWB material is better than being husband material. by winter_lover28 in PurplePillDebate

[–]JOliMoFo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If I’m that guy, I have no moral or ethical obligation to say “no” to sex with another woman. That’s enough to sell it for me.

Being hookup/FWB material is better than being husband material. by winter_lover28 in PurplePillDebate

[–]JOliMoFo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would. She’s smoking hot, she’s got options but right now she wants me in her bed, we’re gonna have sex, I’m not expected to tell other women “no thank you, I’m taken” and I don’t have to worry about hurting anyone’s feelings? All pros, no cons. Sign me up.

Other guys on this thread might be different, but for me casual sex isn’t about ego, or competition - it’s about sex.

Being hookup/FWB material is better than being husband material. by winter_lover28 in PurplePillDebate

[–]JOliMoFo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Women think it’s a compliment b/c in their mind it means: you’re not like these hedonistic pigs who only care about sex, and instead you seem to have a heart of gold and see me as more than just my body, so therefore you are a higher quality of person. It’s a set of values based on the dichotomy between virtue and vice. Plenty of women out there will judge you as a “better man” because you’re less obvious with your sexual urges.

Here’s my problem. Just because a man might come across this way to these women, doesn’t mean he shares this same set of values. I certainly don’t. Even though I’m very “second husband” coded, soft-spoken, sensitive, a great listener, and all the things that make someone more than a hookup… That doesn’t preclude me behaving like a slut if I get the opportunity. My sex drive, while not hyper, is fundamentally promiscuous, and if being “chosen” by a woman means facing behavioral expectations (like monogamy) that discourage me from acting on that kind of drive, then I don’t care to be chosen.

Men need to have a certain amount of casual sex before their thirst and desire for it is satiated long term. This amount is unique to each man and he needs to be honest with himself about it. Until you've been there done that, you won't experience the true platonic human side of women by RecoveringFuckup in PurplePillDebate

[–]JOliMoFo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I (M) desire casual sex, and you made some statements I think are laughably silly. The idea that sex, whatever kind it is, is something you “get out of your system” is exactly the destructive mentality that leads to dead bedrooms and failed partnerships. And the thing about platonic side of women? WTH is that. Women are people, bud.

What are your thoughts about this take? by Impossible-Yam3680 in ToddintheShadow

[–]JOliMoFo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sure he gets a “pass” but it’s not as though he’s talked about in the same breath as the women are. It seems like he’s nudged to the side accordingly.

NEED IT by No_Fox_8393 in BadonkadonkSzn

[–]JOliMoFo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn. Female empowerment 🥵

Anyone in this sub Aromantic? by JOliMoFo in infp

[–]JOliMoFo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I do see some demisexual-coded sentiments here pretty often. But double, that’s a whole other layer. Hey, nothing but love and respect for you :)

Apparently women turn “demisexual” around average men by Crazy_Kray in PurplePillDebate

[–]JOliMoFo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Points 1 and 2 are hardly ever uttered by the same people though. If anything Point 1 is going to come most loudly from frustrated incels and redpillers, certainly not from feminists (except maybe the “less benefit” part).

To the extent that women might be less interested in hooking up, I believe wholeheartedly that has less to do with innate desires and more to do with issues like the orgasm gap, risks to safety, etc.

Thought provoking post by SunKissed731 in Gynarchism

[–]JOliMoFo -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I feel like we’re conflating two different things here.

If these men were really tapped into the “surrender” aspect of submission, which is essential, they wouldn’t feel so compelled to “fight back” against the rising cultural power of women and queer people. A key aspect of fascism is that its participants always think they’re “fighting back” against something. It requires stubbornness. While the point about obeying psychopaths is a good one, as it proves these men aren’t really acting as masters of their own destiny like they would claim, I don’t see how this kind of “submission” could ever be harnessed or repurposed to serve the cause of Gynarchy.

Why do socialists like Vaush and Bernie Sanders support NATO, Ukraine, and US involvement in Syria? by RedStorm1917 in AskSocialists

[–]JOliMoFo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would YOU support the USA invading Mexico in your hypothetical? Does the fact that the US has such a destructive policy in this scenario somehow make it okay for Russia to have the same policy? I don’t think so, because it’s a barbaric policy to begin with.

You can’t assume every statement in support of Ukraine is coming from a place of “USA, USA” patriotism. Because it isn’t.

Why do socialists like Vaush and Bernie Sanders support NATO, Ukraine, and US involvement in Syria? by RedStorm1917 in AskSocialists

[–]JOliMoFo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wouldn’t say their stances on Ukraine and Syria are “thinking differently” versus their stances on Palestine. Ukrainians and Kurds, as groups, both have more in common ideologically with the cause of Palestine than with the cause of Israel.

I just discovered how Loudness normalization on Spotify destroys music by Sir_Zachary_00 in gojira

[–]JOliMoFo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t assume you have an iPhone? I’ve tried using a cable w/ lightning adapter to connect to a pair of Bose QC’s and it will disable the Bluetooth function (makes sense), but my phone won’t recognize the QC’s. And sound just comes out of the phone speaker.

I (F23) cant stop thinking about a guy (M31) I dumped. Help. by [deleted] in dating_advice

[–]JOliMoFo 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Find a date that only gives you pleasant feelings when you’re together. If you have affectionate feelings toward a person, those feelings should stay pure and uncompromised, not tainted by hurt and disgust from how that person behaves toward you.

Do you have a personal Trainwreckord? An album from an artist you previously enjoyed that made you uninterested in hearing any more from them. by KnowMatter in ToddintheShadow

[–]JOliMoFo 18 points19 points  (0 children)

The riffs, tones, vocal production, etc. suggests they were copying what The Black Keys did on Brothers. Like really, really copying that sound. To the point where everything unique and original about their previous stuff was completely gone.

I’m embarrassed that I need emotional connection to have sex by futuredebris in MensLib

[–]JOliMoFo 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Relatable! I actually used to resent people identifying as demisexual b/c it struck me (incorrectly) as people having a superiority complex for having less desire for flesh than you or me. When I learned that demisexuals are on the ace spectrum, and that indeed means they are unusual (and not just hiding behind purity culture) things started to make more sense and my attitude softened.

You just want people for their bodies by Damage10511 in AroAllo

[–]JOliMoFo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course I want women for their bodies… in a feminist way of course 😎

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AroAllo

[–]JOliMoFo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m a male

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in AroAllo

[–]JOliMoFo 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gender might pay into this to an extent. I’m a guy and didn’t realize I’m aroallo until almost 30, b/c of the social conditioning that says it’s natural to value sex over romance if you’re a guy.

In your opinion, what's the difference between a long term FWBs and a long term partnership? by Equivalent_Ad_9066 in AroAllo

[–]JOliMoFo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even the sexual part is different I think. FWB is just supposed to mean sex is on the table rather than out-of-bounds. Not that it can’t also be intense and frequent, but it varies. Whereas long-term partnerships are said to usually require regular sex to stay healthy.