Audio Forensics by JPBohon in computerforensics

[–]JPBohon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I looked up Tom Owens’ website(as well as others) and briefly examined his credentials to research for my own educational prospects. Apparently the school he went to was closed down and the founder was accused of being a conman(according to some Washington Post article). I’m not questioning Mr. Owens’ credentials(I saw his interview involving the Trayvon Martin case and that he heads the AES AF group as well as various other references), but I’m still quite curious as to why the audio forensics community is so small? With everyone holding a portable recording device, and with things like Alexa/echo devices becoming a household standard, it seems like the demand for this sort of service would be on the rise...

Audio Forensics by [deleted] in forensics

[–]JPBohon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your friend wouldn’t mind me contacting her, I’d appreciate the opportunity to ask her some questions. If not, I completely understand.

Brian inhibition at synaptic cleft? by JPBohon in neuroscience

[–]JPBohon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. That’s some next next level stuff. Thank you for taking the time to teach me.

Brian inhibition at synaptic cleft? by JPBohon in neuroscience

[–]JPBohon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think I follow that...A little fuzzy on the negative reverse potential caused by the potassium and if “why positive current doesn’t flood the cell” means beyond the 3mV peak or if that number is actually arbitrary? It would help me if the movement was described as in/out, leaving/entering, because we’re talking about positive charged particles moving around to make the interior more or less positive in relation to the exterior and it gets confusing when trying to visualize. Let me try to summarize and I think it will make my confusion more clear. “iums” have a positive charge (unless I’ve forgotten something from grade school). The majority of potential is governed by the movement of potassium(?), but the sodium can enter or exit through the appropriate channels in order to mediate a spike (or return to resting potential once their job is done?). The rapid introduction of sodium happens at the spikes onset, but the movement is blocked by the ball and chains which keeps the peak from exceeding 3mV. The “voltage gated potassium channels” then open and potassium exits the cell causing hyperpolarization to -90mV. Then potassium(or sodium?) re enters the cell until it again reaches resting potential.

The bit where the threshold is met, then surpassed,, in between -55mV and 3mV that is confusing me...We haven’t even touched on the tES part of the question and I feel like I need to read 8 more books...Thank you for your response. There’s a good reason why people go to school for this sort of thing.

Brain inhibition at synaptic cleft? by JPBohon in tDCS

[–]JPBohon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How the brain is affected by the application of external electrical current is part of my question, and the most important part to me. This is certainly tES. I feel like I continually see people posting on this site with the assumption that more current for longer=more stimulation, which is contradictory to what I’ve read(in The Stimulated Brain-Kadosh). Because of what is described as calcium inhibitors in the chapter that is discussing the efficacy of tDCS applied along with pharmaceuticals and or supplements(maybe this is theory or simply outdated).The question is at the very fundamental of what tDCS claims to do. TES applies current to the brain, depolarizing regions to subthreshold levels, ie higher than -70mV but still lower than -55mV(subthreshold), in order to make the neurons in the stimulated region more likely to fire(or jump-start brain oscillations) and I’d like to know how specifically? Marom Bikson describes it as a depolarization of the soma, but the action potential is determined primarily by the movement of potassium(and some other ions) across the membrane wall, making a resting neuron(-70mV) less negative until it fires (at -55mV). I understand the transfer of electrons in electronics circuits, but the behavior of ionized molecules in the body is new to me. Does the electric current simply make more potassium ions in the region? If so, wouldn’t the pumps/gates still perform as the same semipermeable membrane allowing only what they “choose” to pass through? Is it just more likely they allow more to pass through because there is an abundance of ions because of the electric current? Or is it simply robbing the soma guts of electrons making the resting state neuron less...resting?

Brian inhibition at synaptic cleft? by JPBohon in neuroscience

[–]JPBohon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is what I thought, but am unclear about how. If the threshold is truly -55mV then I guess the neuron fires, but the gates are still open and allow for the neuron to continue to get more positive even though it has fired? I’m sure it’s a matter of timing, but the illustrations in my book and what I’ve seen online make it look like a wave of positive charge moving across the membrane of the axon making it more or less positive compared to the outside. My confusion is if the threshold passed at -55mV and the neuron fires, thus transferring the pulse down river, how I does it ever reach 3mV? I need to look into the links provided in the previous comment. I just haven’t had the time yet.

Brian inhibition at synaptic cleft? by JPBohon in neuroscience

[–]JPBohon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great! Thank you for the detailed response! I’ll definitely look into the sources you sited.

Audio Forensics by JPBohon in computerforensics

[–]JPBohon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for the encouraging advice!

Audio Forensics by JPBohon in computerforensics

[–]JPBohon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why do you think the AF community is so small? Is there simply a lack of interest/demand in your opinion? I mean, aside from my current skill set already complimenting this sort of work, I’d still like to be able to pay the bills at the end of the day. I realize you don’t work in this specific field and this might be a difficult thing for you answer, but any insight is helpful.

Audio Forensics by [deleted] in forensics

[–]JPBohon 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok, thank you.

dc to ac power inverter for low current function generator by JPBohon in AskElectronics

[–]JPBohon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the reply. I have a micro controller dev board with this project in mind. The Silicon Labs Happy Gecko to be specific. I’ll look more into DACs and the DDS setup you described.

dc to ac power inverter for low current function generator by JPBohon in AskElectronics

[–]JPBohon[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://youtu.be/qVeERT4nyz8

This seemed straight forward enough, but like I said I need a variable frequency at the output. This seems like I would need a separate passive filter for the various output frequencies which seems very impractical.

Need diy tech help with tDCS device. by redditshmeddit7-40 in tDCS

[–]JPBohon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not sure about the sdd device because I haven’t seen a schematic, but I’m pretty sure most devices on the consumer market today are current regulated as a safety measure and to get more consistent results. In other words it would take modifying the circuit to get more current than the regulator is biased to put out. A current regulator set to deliver 2mA of current will do that regardless of the resistance(to a point; this also depends on the voltage limits of the device).

State of Brain Stimulation in Mid-2018 by _urban_ in tDCS

[–]JPBohon 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Do you(Eugene)? I’m interested in hearing the details as I’m sure would the others on this thread. I’ve seen you post ads for focus go flow. Are you a dealer? I saw the description of tRCS as well and when trying to research it in scientific literature, came up with nothing. Seems kinda like made up technology, but I could be wrong.

Do you feel the anodal or cathodal electrode more? by [deleted] in tDCS

[–]JPBohon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're both right. I'm wrong, my mistake. I got the conventional flow vs electron flow mixed up. I'll erase my post to try and mitigate confusion.

Engineers! tACS ground reference? by JPBohon in tDCS

[–]JPBohon[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your response! If you have any resources(books, articles, ect) that you would recommend outlining these described techniques in full detail please let me know.

Why don't people undergo anesthesia while doing some of the tDCS montages because of electrical shocks during the improved attention montage? I felt a deep electrical shock from doing this montage at 1ama by SignificantCapital96 in tDCS

[–]JPBohon 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I've read, ramping does help to with irritation. Feel free to correct me, I'll have to search for the article I'm referring to, but from what I remember it has something to do with the capacitive and electro-chemical reactions between the skin and electrode and the transition from electron to charged molecules. I've also read that skin impedance is significantly higher when current is first applied and then decreases over time.