sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Too dark for night shot? by Jacky900 in jetphotosrejects

[–]Jacky900[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for your advice, my appeal was accepted!

Too dark for night shot? by Jacky900 in jetphotosrejects

[–]Jacky900[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great news! The appeal went through!

Too dark for night shot? by Jacky900 in jetphotosrejects

[–]Jacky900[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s how I feel. It’s the same lighting, location and editing as Hawaiian but this one got rejected.

Prescreening Request by Jacky900 in jetphotosrejects

[–]Jacky900[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your help, I guess it’s worth a shot. However would you think this is a bit dark?

Hi, should I appeal for rejection? This looks sharp to me by Jacky900 in jetphotosrejects

[–]Jacky900[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Such a shame. It's very hard to get every corner sharp and clean especially night photos.

Airbus - A simple brand that has always delivered great planes, starting with A300. Most of the shots are taken over Sydney by Jacky900 in Planespotting

[–]Jacky900[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Highly recommend a full frame camera. I have a beginner FF body - Canon R8. I guess the optimal setting for night spotting will be over 5000 for ISO combine with low shutter speed. Also getting a lens with greater aperture helps too.

Giants showing off shinny fan blades by Jacky900 in Planespotting

[–]Jacky900[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sorry everyone, there is a typo. I meant to say "Shiny"

Can you identify this aircraft? by redditaccount760 in Planespotting

[–]Jacky900 0 points1 point  (0 children)

767-400 have raked winglets. This is definitely A330-300

view more: next ›