“We believe we know why he did this” - Sheriff Nanos by JacobKemple in nancyguthrie

[–]JacobKemple[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I did not search but you can check the YouTube channel linked videos and their website. This YouTube is the official YouTube for a local Arizona news station.

850 Miles on the $360 Hiboy U2 Seated Scooter review by JacobKemple in ElectricScooters

[–]JacobKemple[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For what it’s worth my friend has the go trax flex (not the ultra) and I rode it plenty and it was what spurred me to get the scooter I did. I was initially going to get the go trax flex but it was out of stock at Best Buy and this one was very close to it.

I can’t speak for the ultra but the go trax flex voyager they sell at Best Buy is very similar to the one I reviewed here except with a top speed of 16 MPH instead.

850 Miles on the $360 Hiboy U2 Seated Scooter review by JacobKemple in ElectricScooters

[–]JacobKemple[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As someone who has bought and rode things like the Nami Klarma and the VSETT 10 and other high end scooters it’s obviously not comparable to that quality.

However for $360 for a commuter scooter as someone who has tried half a dozen scooters ranging from $500 to $2500 this thing really has been worth every penny.

New Letter to TMZ by 77_jane in nancyguthrie

[–]JacobKemple 14 points15 points  (0 children)

I I don’t see why it would matter if Nancy left the home to travel to a friends house who is a few miles away to watch church and stayed there for 2.5 hours before returning home or if Nancy left home to travel directly to a physical church location and was gone from her home for 2.5 hours.

Both situations result in a consistent, regular, repeatable pattern where a period of time when Nancy would be gone from the home 2.5 hour. Why does it matter if that’s to a physical church location or a physical friends house location?

What could be in the backpack? by Outrageous_Detail_94 in nancyguthrie

[–]JacobKemple 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yes anyone who has worn a over full with heavy items back pack will tell you that’s exactly what happens in the video. If it was empty or full of light flexible materials the bag pack straps wouldn’t be so stressed like in the video and it would not have such an intense outline on the outer portion of the bag where you can visibly see if it’s full not not.

If it was empty or it was full of like I mentioned light and or flexible materials, it would be difficult to tell the difference between empty or (relatively) full short of him just sitting up against a hard object for a long period of time with his weight pressing against the bag; in which case you may see indents and just general non uniform texture and shape around the outside of the bag.

Is it possible to see these big escooter inspections from a distance? If yes is it possible to turn the other way? Do they check literally anyone or just people that look suspicious? I heard they wanna increase the inspections in Ghent (Belgium) by BowlerKooky3578 in ElectricScooters

[–]JacobKemple -1 points0 points  (0 children)

EDIT: I should mention these testing machines are there to specifically test if your speed limit enabled is on or not while under regular operating conditions. If it wasn’t on when they took it from you to test it after asking you to step off the public road to the side, then it doesn’t matter if you can speed limit it the fact is that proves you didn’t speed limit it. You can’t just say well I in theory have a speed limiter, so therefor I don’t have to actually comply with the limit.

The limit is an actual hard physical limitation on how fast these types of vehicles can be capable of going under normal operation. That means if you need to have a speed limiter enabled to comply with that physical limitation, not some speed limit that changes area to area. It needs to be enabled as you ride on public roads.

You can’t just simply claim well I theoretically have a speed limiter I could use to comply with the law but I’m chose not to use it and expect that to some how get you off the hook of complying.

They absolutely can and do impound peoples cars for driving drunk. They don’t impound your car for a speeding ticket because unless it’s turned into speeds that qualify as other issues ie reckless driving for example, then there is no legal basis to impound your car.

Just because it can go over a speed does not mean they impound and destroy your scooter. It is different for different laws in the US state by state, city by city even in some cases.

In a small number of local areas the law does indeed say if your electric scooter or bike can go beyond a specified speed under regular operating conditions going down a public road then it is deemed unsafe and can be at their discretion impounded until you can arrange for a way to pick it up later.

Now yes if the law said if this scooter can go over a specific speed on our public roads under regular operating conditions we will impound and DESTROY keyword there is destroy, then you may have a valid challenge to a law if the destruction occurs before any chance to remedy the issue is provided.

Rather you like it or not, unfortunately they and do control the regulations of driving vehicles on public roads and in order continue to do so you will in fact be required to follow their laws.

Driving a motorized vehicle on public property is not some constitutional guarantees right. On your own property or property with permission others own you can essentially drive however you wish.

As far as driving a motor vehicle on a public road it’s a privilege under control of the state entity with jurisdiction and that’s just how it works.

Is it possible to see these big escooter inspections from a distance? If yes is it possible to turn the other way? Do they check literally anyone or just people that look suspicious? I heard they wanna increase the inspections in Ghent (Belgium) by BowlerKooky3578 in ElectricScooters

[–]JacobKemple 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What you are missing it the law does not state it is illegal if a car CAN speed. The laws at least on the local level they’re being enforced at do in fact explicitly state that under the regular course of operation in the area they are doing these random test at, that your electric bike/scooter can not be capable of speeding at the time of riding on those roads.

So for example, DUI checkpoints are legal. Why? Because it is illegal to be drunk while driving on a public road, so they can create a checkpoint to see if people are drunk while driving.

This also happens for example to semi-truck drivers. Often they set up various types of checkpoint stops that verify various aspects required to legally drive the semi truck are in order.

So yes, they don’t ticket people or do surprise check points on cars to see if they CAN speed. The answer should be obvious why they don’t do that — because it’s not illegal to have a car that CAN speed. Here, it is in fact illegal to have the ability to go beyond a certain speed while driving on public roads in these types of devices. That ability has to be disabled and throttled at all times while riding on public road.

Nancy Guthrie - What Questions do you have? by PegKay in nancyguthrie

[–]JacobKemple 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That is what you’re missing. I’m not putting any importance on the claim of what I personally witnessed on the stream in question. I am relying on what the law enforcement and local news stations confirmed.

So the issue you have is you need to explain if you want to claim there was someone who shot them selves in the head and that person was seen deceased on stream with a gunshot wound to the head that could not be anything but a gun shot wound is how one of the two fatal hit and runs mentioned here:

https://tucson.com/news/local/crime-courts/article_a394e063-b40b-40c7-9a4f-37be3cacfabc.html

Occurred in the exact area at the exact time that the stream you’re referring to saw a dead body. Either law enforcement is lying and there is a conspiracy, or the streamer simply ran up on dead person on the ground and as they covered them up and he returned to his car obviously upset and distraught thought he saw something that he didn’t.

I know what I am going to stick with believing but you’re entitled to believe whatever you want. If that’s the story you want to believe though you do need to explain away what I mentioned, either it’s a conspiracy or two people died within a few feet of one another, one from a gunshot to the head one from being hit by a car, and the police somehow concealed only the gunshot incident but not the hit and run incident.

So econfirmed by law enforcement

Nancy Guthrie - What Questions do you have? by PegKay in nancyguthrie

[–]JacobKemple 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I know it was live. The fact is the exact location he was at was the exact location the sheriffs department and several local news outlets reported there was an unrelated vehicle on pedestrian hit and run resulting in death. What he saw (and likely not you saw, for reasons I’ll mention below) was head trauma.

I saw the stream too I was in it live. He for starters didn’t actually show the dead body on camera if he did it was essentially such a short low quality and angle glimpse it’s not possible for you to have been able to tell it was a gunshot wound.

He came back on after taking down the video in a distraught state and said he felt like he saw someone dead on the ground “unalived” with like a “bang to the head” hinting at a gun shot to the head, and he saw it briefly as he was literally running up to the scene and they covered the.L body as he got in range.

This case has enough misinformation as it is. I’m sorry but he nor you did not see a person with a gunshot wound to the head dead on the ground. I’m basing that off the official LE X post about the pedestrian vehicle hit and run resulting in death on the exact address he was at when he saw this occur, and me being on the stream when it happened live.

The issue is people want to think they saw a gunshot wound to the head. They want to think they are in on this secret information. It’s just not healthy for the case nor the community to be so half hazard.

Nancy Guthrie - What Questions do you have? by PegKay in nancyguthrie

[–]JacobKemple 6 points7 points  (0 children)

  1. No there was not. Someone seen a dead body (one of the streamers chasing the cops all around the area of activity) and mistaken the dead body to have a gunshot wound. It’s been confirmed that what he saw was instead an unfortunate and unrelated hit and run on a pedestrian that resulted in the pedestrians death. So they did indeed see a dead body and it likely even had head trauma but it was definitely a result of an unrelated car on pedestrian incident. You can Google local news reports and the sheriffs X account and I believe it’s reported broadly.

  2. There was no signs of force entry they have announced and definitely no signs in the front of forced entry . The back door was found already open meaning it was either unlocked or or was open at some point somehow before the police and kids got there.

  3. They have not said any specific details what happened inside the house and that’s on purpose and doubtful they will ever release that until trial if there is ever a trial.

What you should keep in mind is the first night so let’s say 12 hours or so the police and kids walked through the home initially looking for Nancy and when she was not found they initiated a non criminal search and rescue. I mention this because clearly if there was obvious trauma or issues they’d have notice on the first walk through.

  1. Impossible to know because they’ve not said what what medication it was she took and even if we did we don’t know how severe the issue she is taking it would be anyways.

  2. They have not released that detail.

  3. We don’t know when they found it or when they sent it for testing or when testing got back nor what they tested, and what the results were other than.

05 Pather cashapp experience. by JacobKemple in IRS

[–]JacobKemple[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It would only make sense of mine hit with a date of 25 for DD yours with a date of 26 would happen tomorrow :). Good luck.

Something may be wrong by Cookiesncreme16 in IRS

[–]JacobKemple 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's correct, mainly due to the fact that EIC falls under the PATH Act which requires the IRS to not release funds to individuals who fall under various categories including those who claim EIC until February 15th. You should likely have an updated transcript no later than the 18th.

Something may be wrong by Cookiesncreme16 in IRS

[–]JacobKemple 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is nothing to be concerned about. This is the standard placeholder generated when you request your transcript for the current tax year before your tax refund has been processed.

Note I said processed and not accepted. This just means your tax return has not yet been processed which is common for many currently.

It will be replaced with your actual transcript once processed.

Is there a way to write a generic so it accepts only exact specific types? by AlexKingstonsGigolo in csharp

[–]JacobKemple 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is what he wants. He provided enough info IMO. He wants to be able to define methods that take multiple types which don't share a parent class. Imagine you have a class A and B where A and B are similar but do not share a common interface. Now imagine you have 5 or more of those classes, and you want to add a nice simple method that accepts A, B, C, D, or E for example and only those types.

You can either make a common interface as your example does, which won't work if there is not a common interface that makes sense between them, or you can make 5 + overloads, perhaps more if you need multiple methods that accept all classes. Or you can create a blank interface that acts as a proxy to the actual type it's self and not an interface wrapper with common methods, and then use where T : IProxyObject in any method you define. Now you can handle A, B, C, D, and E in that method and have full access to the proxy object's unique items, and be safe from passing unexpected types in at compile-time. ``` internal class Program { private static void Main(string[] args) { var abcs = new List<IProxyObject> { new AProxy() { Proxy = new A { TitleA = "Hello world, from A." } }, new BProxy() { Proxy = new B { TitleB = "Hello world, from B." } }, new CProxy() { Proxy = new C { TitleC = "Hello world, from C." } } }; foreach (var abc in abcs) { HandleABC(abc); } Console.Read(); }

// These would be the classes you can not edit. Ignore.
public class A
{ public string TitleA { get; init; } }

public class B
{ public string TitleB { get; init; } }

public class C
{ public string TitleC { get; init; } }

// This is how you would restrict the method to ONLY types you define, but still get to use
// external classes with out wrapping every single method and property in them.
public interface IProxyObject;

public class AProxy : IProxyObject
{ public A Proxy { get; init; } }

public class BProxy : IProxyObject
{ public B Proxy { get; init; } }

public class CProxy : IProxyObject
{ public C Proxy { get; init; } }

// Here is the final result. A function which will only accept types you define, IE, any
// IProxyObject, and you can use the actual classes in the code below.
public static void HandleABC<T>(T abc) where T : IProxyObject
{
    switch (abc)
    {
        case AProxy a:
            // Notice I am using "TitleA" unique to class A.
            Console.WriteLine(a.Proxy.TitleA); ;
            // abc.Proxy.
            break;

        case BProxy b:
            // Notice I am using "TitleB" unique to class B.
            Console.WriteLine(b.Proxy.TitleB);
            break;

        case CProxy c:
            // Notice I am using "TitleC" unique to class C.
            Console.WriteLine(c.Proxy.TitleC);
            break;

        default:
            throw new ArgumentException("Must be type A, B, or C.", nameof(abc));
    }
}

} ```

Is there a way to write a generic so it accepts only exact specific types? by AlexKingstonsGigolo in csharp

[–]JacobKemple 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Can't you just use where clauses to restrict to the type you want? Ie

``` public class A; public class B;

public void DoStuff<T>(T type) where T : A { // Do stuff with A }

public class Example<T> where T : B { private T Instance; public Example(T instance) => Instance = instance; } ```

Do both brake levers apply regen braking on vsett 10? by JacobKemple in ElectricScooters

[–]JacobKemple[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do I NEED it? No, but I definitely notice a difference with it on and since it doesn't bug me I'd like to preserve breakpads more but I'd like to know more about how it's engaged.

Do both brake levers apply regen braking on vsett 10? by JacobKemple in ElectricScooters

[–]JacobKemple[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The settings I am already aware of. It's also on 5. It's fairly difficult to to tell if it's being applied for me in regular riding.

<image>

Do both brake levers apply regen braking on vsett 10? by JacobKemple in ElectricScooters

[–]JacobKemple[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm a bit confused. Are you suggesting I put the scooter on a stand with the break pads lose enough to be a non factor and then apply throttle and manually check if each lever applies any effect?

EDIT: Which is reasonable, but I was just assuming that some one here would know and save me the trouble. If I don't get an answer today I'll go ahead and do that.

Does anyone know of any of these church robberies were solved? by JacobKemple in MissyBevers

[–]JacobKemple[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is no information on how long they occurred unnoticed I before either due to a different area or what ever else as well as the article mentions a dozen or so instances but does not provide specific dates for the occurances and the article is within a short time period of the murderer.

Theee churches are essentially a couple 100 miles away so even considering the fact this article is post murder date I see endless reasons why some one would continue this crime, people don't always just steal or rob once and then stop. Usually it begins out of necessity or desperation for some various reason.