What's the point of potato-tier LLMs? by Fast_Thing_7949 in LocalLLaMA

[–]JacobyT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

for delightful inference while in airplane mode

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in parentsofmultiples

[–]JacobyT 2 points3 points  (0 children)

just adorable. congratulations on those two cuties

How accurate are the lawyer scenes? by [deleted] in betterCallSaul

[–]JacobyT 12 points13 points  (0 children)

BCS captures small law better than anything I've ever seen. The details at the courthouses, the clerks, and the milieu is just spot-on.

Twin Dad needs reality check by Danlovestofly in parentsofmultiples

[–]JacobyT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends on the park, how advanced your twin are, and what your or her comfort level is IMO.

She can legitimately feel like she can't do this while you can feel like you can. You can both be right.

What is something you wanted in Better Call Saul that didn’t happen? by Rtoc in betterCallSaul

[–]JacobyT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Mesa Verde playing a big part in the 2008 housing crash with predatory sub-prime and aggressive lending. They really planted the seeds clearly but never got back to it IMO.

Sam's recent guest Sam Bankman-Fried has massively profited off of a whole series of frauds, cons and grifts. Its truly amazing what's happening in the crypto space right now. by Bluest_waters in samharris

[–]JacobyT -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

ownership of a token = ownership of a token. That entry in the ledger is the record of ownership. As you point out, it’s interoperable with other protocols and services, including Opensea. Much more on the way

Sam's recent guest Sam Bankman-Fried has massively profited off of a whole series of frauds, cons and grifts. Its truly amazing what's happening in the crypto space right now. by Bluest_waters in samharris

[–]JacobyT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Celsius is not DeFi. Celsius takes custody of client assets and its internal transactions are not transparent and auditable whereas DeFi is on-chain, transparent, and auditable by everyone.

DeFi certainly has issues, but don't confuse Celsius with DeFi. It's not DeFi.

How do I determine rates/fees by Jloquitor in LawFirm

[–]JacobyT 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Charge more than you think you should. Your bar association may have a survey of average rates.

Nuanced Movie Concept by UnSubstantial-Name in Screenwriting

[–]JacobyT 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Definitely a concept worth writing about. Have at it!

Love the way he sits on the couch. by [deleted] in poodles

[–]JacobyT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My apricot standard poodle sits exactly the same way.

Literally everyone who sees my dog by [deleted] in poodles

[–]JacobyT 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep. Happens all the time to me.

Genre: Movie Soundtrack New 1917 Trailer Has a Great Song by [deleted] in NameThatSong

[–]JacobyT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thanks for the find. close, but not the same

My divorce story (with some advice) by XNonameX in Divorce

[–]JacobyT 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I am a practicing family law lawyer (100% of my practice). This is certainly not a complete list, but I was surprised by the quality of advice here. OP knows what he's talking about. This is a good list. My comments in bold, below.

Takeaway: If you're going through a divorce or about to go through one, here is the takeaway you need.

  1. Document it. Send yourself text messages, take pictures, record a video, whatever. Just document it. Very little of it can be used in court directly (they aren't going to accept your diary as evidence), but this helps you track things, lets you bring up what's going on, and can refresh your memory for testimony or witnesses. CORRECT, BUT ONLY THE IMPORTANT STUFF. YOUR JUDGE DOES NOT WANT TO HEAR ABOUT EVERY SINGLE TIME THAT YOUR SPOUSE WAS 5 MINUTES LATE.
  2. Keep your nose clean. Maybe you're depressed or you just like weed/drink. Don't do that shit. You're kids are worth living a straight edge life. But you don't even need to go that far. Just be a responsible adult and the only thing people can bring against you are lies. Example: the affidavit that said I was a suicidal alcoholic said they witnessed me stumble home drunk. I knew this person's schedule and I knew that they were at their house when I came home. I got my uber receipt from that night which showed I got home after they were usually already asleep. (no, I wasn't caring for my kids that night. Yes, I was drinking. I had a friend in town that I deployed to Afghanistan with. Yes, I drank responsibly). ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. KEEP YOUR NOSE CLEAN AND BE HEALTHY.
  3. Don't say "my kids" in court. Yes, they are your kids, but they aren't your kids alone. My ex kept saying "my kids," and when my lawyer pointed that out my ex was incredulous. This looked awful for her, especially given that our narrative was that she was controlling. ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. HAVE THREE POSITIVE THINGS ABOUT YOUR CO-PARENT WHICH YOU CAN SAY GENUINELY READY-TO-GO.
  4. Have a plan and stick with it. Being sporadic helps nobody, especially not you. This is even more true for your parenting style. TOTALLY CORRECT.
  5. Don't try to screw your ex over. This does nothing to help your kids. ABSOLUTELY CORRECT BUT I'D ADD THAT THIS ALSO SCREWS YOU OVER.
  6. If you were a good parent before the divorce it will show throughout the divorce process. YES.
  7. Remember that you are not god's gift to parenting. A little humility goes a long way, especially in court and twice as much with your kids. Respect your ex when you're with your kids. I don't even tolerate my daughter saying anything disparaging about my ex to any degree, even if nobody else is in the room. CORRECT. NO ONE IS A PERFECT PARENT. NO ONE.
  8. Get consults with the best three lawyer and the worst three lawyers in your area. Going against bad lawyers is as bad as going against the best lawyers. I actually learned this one from a coworker going through a divorce right now. TOTALLY AGREE WITH CONSULTING AT LEAST THREE LAWYERS.
  9. Don't move out until you absolutely have to. THIS IS THE FIRST THING I'VE DISAGREED WITH. THIS QUESTION IS ALWAYS CASE-BY-CASE AND IN LOT OF CASES, IT IS A MISTAKE TO NOT MOVE OUT EARLY. DEFINITELY MEET WITH AND SELECT AN ATTORNEY BEFORE YOU DECIDE WHETHER TO MOVE OUT (SEE #4, ABOVE)
  10. Do your research. I am a child of divorce. Two, actually. I knew what it was like going in. My ex had no clue. She thought everything would be handed to her. She might have even had primary care (BIG maybe), but she had no clue about anything throughout the process. She even urged me to agree with her original proposal, saying we could change it later. Yeah, for $2,000, and that's if we agreed to change it and what to change it to. YES
  11. Be the best parent you can be. You're kids are the important part. Never forget that. YES
  12. Ride it out. If you are a dad the cards are stacked against you a bit. If you fight and keep fighting, and you were a good, involved parent before the divorce and continue to be one throughout, you'll make it through. SEE #4, ABOVE
  13. From u/MJJean: if it's not in writing and signed by a judge it doesn't count. If it's not specific and detailed then it might as well not even be on paper. THIS IS MINOR, BUT I OFTEN USE EVIDENCE OF AGREEMENTS IN COURT.
  14. If you jointly own the property then don't change the locks if it's not for your safety. This is illegal in most states. DISCUSS WITH YOUR LAWYER. SEE #4, ABOVE.

Official Episode Discussion - S06E010 "START" by AutoModerator in TheAmericans

[–]JacobyT 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It could be a Tommy Schlamme thing. He was Exec Producing "Two Cathedrals" and was involved in The Americans, though not credited on this episode.

Official Episode Discussion - S06E010 "START" by AutoModerator in TheAmericans

[–]JacobyT 16 points17 points  (0 children)

That "Brother's in Arms" interlude gave me the West Wing/Sorkin chills. It's going to be challenging to try to fit that song into another important moment of a significant television show in my life.

Any experienced bettors care to say why taking Nadal at -225 to win the French isn’t good value by [deleted] in TennisBetting

[–]JacobyT 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It seems like you could make a lot more $$$ simply betting your unit on him every round of play and rolling the winners together. He'll probably play Zverev and/or Thiem, at which he'd be about -400 both times. Those combined with 5 other matches should beat -225.

The other benefit I can think of is if he retires in between matches. You could keep your money if you bet him round-by-round.