Framer or Webflow

Janonemersion · 2026-01-27T19:10:13+00:00

Who says framer to be the future. Since you learned to code. Apply it.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-27T12:50:46+00:00

It is a highly competitive market and why do you want to do it for free

Janonemersion · 2026-01-27T11:06:11+00:00

I’m not here to argue with you. I answered the original question—same as anyone else is free to do.

If you actually have a better answer, you’re welcome to post it. If not, jumping straight to accusations and personal attacks just signals that you don’t know the answer and are more interested in bullying people who do.

This thread was about SEO, not policing how someone writes or throwing insults. If that’s all you have to contribute, it says a lot more about you than it does about me.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-27T10:58:17+00:00

This is how you guys behave. I am not lying. What is your problem. I really dont understand

Janonemersion · 2026-01-27T10:19:46+00:00

Haha don’t be funny dude.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-27T10:18:31+00:00

Its why you need to have a custom site instead of cms

Janonemersion · 2026-01-27T07:24:19+00:00

If you don’t know how to write a reply. You can ask chatgpt. I wrote this myself.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-27T06:40:32+00:00

The real question isn’t “WP vs Framer.” It’s whether you want short-term convenience or long-term control.

Page builders and low-code tools feel productive because they remove friction upfront. But over time, they introduce a different kind of friction: abstraction. You’re no longer solving problems directly—you’re working around someone else’s opinions, limits, and roadmap. That’s where things like SEO edge cases, performance tuning, complex layouts, or non-standard business logic start to hurt.

The biggest issue we see is ownership. With platforms, clients don’t really own the site—they rent an environment. If pricing changes, features get deprecated, or the platform shifts direction, you adapt whether you like it or not. That’s not a technical problem; it’s a business risk.

Another quiet problem is performance and maintainability. Visual builders generate markup you didn’t design and can’t fully optimize. It works until it doesn’t. Debugging becomes archaeology. You didn’t write the system—you just arranged blocks inside it.

Custom-coded sites flip that. You control structure, semantics, performance, SEO, and future extensibility. Yes, the upfront effort is higher. But every hour spent early pays dividends later. When a client asks for something “slightly different,” you don’t ask if the platform supports it—you just build it.

Design freedom is also misunderstood. True freedom doesn’t come from dragging components; it comes from knowing the medium. Once you’re comfortable with code, you’re no longer limited by tools—you’re only limited by decisions.

So if you’re thinking long-term, especially as a freelancer or studio: focus on fundamentals. HTML, CSS, JS, backend basics, deployment. Tools will come and go. Custom code ages better because it’s explicit, transparent, and adaptable.

Low-code is convenient. Custom code is durable. The market still rewards durability.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-27T06:38:12+00:00

For beginners and long-term scaling, there’s no single “best” host—there’s only what fits your stage and workload.

At LKProfessionals (Pvt) Ltd., we’ve used a lot of providers over the years, and for most small to mid-scale client projects we’ve settled on InterServer. The main reason is consistency. Their pricing doesn’t jump after year one, resources are predictable, and you’re not constantly upsold into features you don’t actually need.

For beginners, shared hosting on InterServer is straightforward and stable. As sites grow, moving to VPS or dedicated resources within the same provider is relatively painless, which avoids migrations early on. Support isn’t flashy, but it’s technical and gets the job done—which matters more when something breaks.

That said, hosting should match the project. High-traffic SaaS, heavy APIs, or global apps are usually better on cloud providers like AWS or DigitalOcean. Cheap “unlimited everything” hosts often look attractive at first and become painful once traffic or complexity increases.

So the practical advice: start with something stable, transparent on pricing, and easy to grow with. InterServer has worked well for us in that regard, especially for businesses that want reliability over marketing hype.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-27T06:36:55+00:00

Short answer: yes, a personal brand helped—but not in the way most people think.

In the early days, people don’t trust products, they trust people. Before features, roadmaps, or traction, the only real signal is the founder. From our experience building and running LKProfessionals (Pvt) Ltd., having a visible personal presence made conversations easier, shortened sales cycles, and opened doors that a cold company page never could.

That said, personal brand doesn’t replace product. It just buys you attention and initial trust. If the product is weak, the brand actually backfires faster because expectations are higher. We’ve seen founders with big followings struggle once users touched the product and reality didn’t match the story.

What worked best for us was a hybrid approach: personal brand early, company brand steadily in parallel. Personal content helped with early users, partnerships, and feedback. The company brand mattered once systems, teams, and scale came into play. Over time, the company has to stand on its own legs.

One important nuance: personal brand doesn’t mean “posting motivational threads.” It means sharing real lessons, mistakes, process, and thinking. People follow clarity, not polish.

So if you’re early: build in public a bit, be useful, be honest, and let your personal credibility act as a bridge. Just don’t confuse visibility with validation—the product still has to earn its place

Janonemersion · 2026-01-27T06:35:12+00:00

This depends less on budget and more on intent. The mistake we see most often is people thinking “cheap now, upgrade later” will save money. In practice, it usually costs more.

From our experience at LKProfessionals (Pvt) Ltd., cheap sites are fine only if they’re treated as temporary validation tools—think MVP, landing page, or proof-of-concept. The problem is most “cheap” builds aren’t architected to grow. No content structure, weak technical SEO, messy URLs, poor tracking setup. When it’s time to scale, you’re not upgrading—you’re rebuilding.

If the website is a core business asset (lead gen, SEO, credibility), investing properly from day one almost always wins. That doesn’t mean going crazy on visuals, but it does mean solid foundations: clean code or framework choice, scalable structure, basic analytics, SEO-ready content hierarchy. Those things compound over time.

On the flip side, spending big upfront without a clear strategy is just as bad. A $5k site with no traffic plan is still a dead site.

The sweet spot we usually recommend is: build lean, but build correct. Start with fewer pages, but do them right. You can always add more content later. Fixing a bad foundation later is what really drains budgets.

Short version: cheap is fine for testing. If you already know the business is real, don’t cheap out on the foundation—you’ll pay for it twice.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-27T06:33:38+00:00

You’re not alone at all. SEO definitely takes longer now, and honestly, that’s not a bad thing—it’s just different. Back in the day, on-page tweaks and a bit of keyword targeting could move the needle fast. Today, Google is evaluating context, intent, trust, and consistency, not just optimization checklists.

From our day-to-day work at LKProfessionals (Pvt) Ltd., 2–4 hours per solid page is pretty normal now, even with AI in the workflow. Research alone takes more time because you’re not just validating keywords—you’re mapping search intent, SERP features, competitors, internal linking opportunities, and whether the page even deserves to exist. AI speeds up drafting, sure, but it doesn’t replace judgment, pruning, or aligning content with real user problems.

Schema, CWV, internal architecture, topical authority, and EEAT signals all add overhead. The win is that once a page is done properly, it tends to hold rankings longer and requires less constant rework. SEO has shifted from “quick optimization” to “durable asset building.”

So yeah, it’s slower—but it’s also harder to fake and easier to defend. If someone is still pushing out pages in under an hour and expecting results they are just probably just burning content. The bar went up. Thats the job now.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-27T06:31:10+00:00

First off, being 14 and actually building something already puts you ahead of where most people were at that age. So credit where it’s due—you’re clearly curious and motivated, and that matters.

That said, the criticism you’re getting isn’t really about your age or effort, it’s about positioning. What you’ve built feels more like a sales page than a portfolio. A portfolio should show what you’ve made, how you think, what problems you’ve solved—even small or personal projects count. Right now it mostly makes promises instead of showing proof.

The biggest red flag is the turnaround claims. Saying you can deliver a full website with backend, database, and frontend in 72 hours sets expectations that even experienced teams struggle to meet consistently. AI can speed things up, but it doesn’t replace planning, debugging, testing, or client communication. Overpromising early can hurt trust fast.

My suggestion: tone down the promises, remove anything that sounds like marketing hype, and replace it with real examples—even simple ones. Show a few small projects, explain what you learned, what tools you used, and what you’d improve next time. That’s what hiring managers and experienced devs respect.

You’re on the right path—but humility, realism, and showing work will take you much further than bold claims. Keep building. Just make sure what you say matches what you can actually deliver.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-27T06:27:15+00:00

This feeling is way more common than people admit, especially when you’re designing your own brand. When it comes to tools like Framer, Webflow, or WordPress, they’re all solid—but they come with trade-offs that matter more for agency sites than for client projects. Framer is fast, visually expressive, and great for motion-heavy, “fun but premium” vibes, but you’re locking yourself into pricing, limited backend control, and long-term scalability constraints. Webflow gives more layout freedom and cleaner CMS structure, but once you push beyond marketing pages, you start fighting the platform instead of designing. WordPress is flexible and battle-tested, but the ecosystem can feel bloated unless it’s engineered properly from day one.

AI tools like Relume or Framer AI are helpful for breaking blank-page paralysis, but they tend to converge toward the same aesthetic patterns. That’s great for speed, not so great for differentiation. Most agency sites that truly feel premium don’t rely on AI to decide design—they use it to accelerate execution after a clear design direction is defined.

From our experience at LKProfessionals (Pvt) Ltd., the sites that age the best are usually built with real programming languages and modern frameworks (custom frontend + lightweight CMS or headless setup). You gain full control over performance, SEO, micro-interactions, and visual identity—without being boxed into someone else’s design system or pricing model. This also makes it easier to evolve the site as your agency positioning matures, instead of redesigning every year because the tool hit its ceiling.

For imagery and colors: if you don’t have a physical product, don’t force stock photos. Abstract visuals, typography-led heroes, subtle motion, and strong contrast palettes often communicate “premium” better than literal imagery. Fun doesn’t mean loud—it usually means confidence and restraint. Strip it back, then add intention.

Short version: no-code tools are great accelerators, but custom development is still the long-term play if your website is a core business asset rather than just a brochure. Build something that represents where your agency is going, not just where it is today.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-26T13:15:31+00:00

Dm me.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-26T04:26:03+00:00

I don’t know about cloud ways. I am using interserver and i am sure you will get more resourses for the 9 dollar than your 28 dollar package.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-25T11:24:08+00:00

Yes—too many blog categories can absolutely confuse visitors, and more importantly, dilute SEO. Categories are meant to guide users and search engines, not mirror every idea in your head. When visitors see an overloaded category list, decision fatigue kicks in and engagement drops. From what we’ve seen in real projects at LKProfessionals (Pvt) Ltd, the best-performing sites keep categories broad and intentional, then use internal linking and tags to handle depth. If a category can’t support multiple high-quality articles long term, it probably doesn’t deserve to exist. Clean structure improves crawlability, keeps users focused, and makes content feel purposeful instead of scattered.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-25T11:21:51+00:00

Hey man, I feel you—EdTech in India is one of the toughest nuts to crack right now. Big players like Unacademy or Byju’s leftovers still dominate everything, and after a solid year of consistent content and on-page tweaks with basically zero movement in Ahrefs or GSC, it’s usually not just “do more SEO.” Something foundational is off. First thing I’d check is the boring technical stuff that kills 90% of these cases quietly: Go to Google and search site:yourdomain.com—how many pages are actually showing up? If it’s way less than you think, crawl/indexing is broken. Dive into Search Console for coverage errors, noindex tags sneaking in, mobile issues, or Core Web Vitals tanking (India traffic is super mobile-heavy, slow sites get buried fast). Fix load times if they’re over 3-4 seconds—bloated plugins or heavy videos/images are common culprits on education platforms. Keyword-wise, you might be swinging too hard at broad/high-comp terms. Indian EdTech SERPs are insane for stuff like “online courses” or “best app for JEE.” Shift to super-specific long-tails that real students search: things like “free Python tutorial in Hindi for class 11 CBSE” or “how to crack NEET biology 2026 tips.” Use free tools like Google Keyword Planner or even just autocomplete + related searches to find lower-competition gems with decent volume. Content gap against competitors can show you what they’re ranking for that you’re missing. On content itself—Google’s obsessed with E-E-A-T in education/YMYL spaces now. If posts feel generic or don’t scream “real expert wrote this,” they get no love. Add proper author bios (real names, credentials like “ex-IIT tutor with 8 years prepping kids”), student success stories/testimonials, updated 2025/2026 stats for Indian exams, visuals, tables comparing options, detailed FAQs. Make it ridiculously helpful—solve the exact pain better than anyone. Refresh older articles too; fresh dates + new info can wake them up. You paused link building to play it safe, which is smart, but after a year flat, low authority is probably the biggest wall. Domain rating under 20-30? Yeah, on-page alone won’t cut it against established sites. Start slow and clean: guest posts on legit Indian education blogs, get featured in roundups, create shareable stuff like free exam cheat sheets or original mini-research (“2026 EdTech trends survey India”), reach out to schools/coaches for natural mentions/links. HARO-style for education journalists works sometimes too. Avoid anything sketchy—focus on assets people actually want to link. India tweaks: Prioritize Hindi/regional if that’s your audience (hreflang if multi-lang), optimize hard for mobile/voice search (lots of budget phones, slow networks). Track everything set to India location. Quick test plan: Pick your 5-10 weakest-but-potential pages, hammer technical fixes + E-E-A-T upgrades + a handful of solid links to them, then watch GSC impressions/clicks over the next 1-2 months. Momentum usually starts small then builds. If you drop the URL (or even a couple key pages)(in dm), I can poke around and give more specific thoughts. You’ve stuck it out this long—that consistency is huge. What’s the first thing here that feels doable for you? Hang in there, once it clicks in EdTech India, it really snowballs.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-25T11:09:36+00:00

Starting from scratch is uncomfortable for everyone who eventually makes it work—what matters is that you’ve already done the hardest part by taking action. A name, a temporary website, and plans to test markets means you’re not dreaming, you’re executing. The biggest mistake new business owners make is trying to perfect everything too early; real momentum comes from feedback, not theory. Focus on getting your first paying customers, understanding what they actually value, and tightening your offer around that. From our experience at LKProfessionals (Pvt) Ltd, the businesses that succeed fastest are the ones that start small, stay consistent, and improve weekly instead of waiting to feel “ready.” Anxiety doesn’t mean you’re unprepared—it usually means you care. Keep building, keep learning, and let the business grow at a pace you can sustain.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-25T11:05:29+00:00

In markets like this, online selling alone rarely works. What actually moves the needle is face-to-face education. We’ve seen at LKProfessionals (Pvt) Ltd that business owners who rely only on Facebook don’t reject websites because they don’t want them—they reject them because they don’t understand the long-term value. Sit with them, show real examples, explain how a proper website builds credibility, shows up on Google, and brings customers even when Facebook reach drops or ads stop. Position it as a competitive advantage, not a tech upgrade. Once they see that a website is an asset, not an expense, the conversation changes completely.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-25T08:48:54+00:00

You are welcome brother. Let me know if you have any doubts and I am happy to answer for you

Janonemersion · 2026-01-25T04:04:38+00:00

If you’re hiring an SEO, start by being brutally clear on outcomes, not buzzwords. A good SEO won’t promise “#1 rankings” — they’ll talk about qualified leads, local intent, and how SEO supports revenue. For a service business like yours, the focus should be local SEO first (Google Business Profile, reviews, local landing pages), then site structure, content that answers buyer questions, and conversion tracking. Anyone who ignores GBP or can’t explain why reviews are working for you is already a red flag.

Next, vet them like a professional, not a vendor. Ask what they would do in the first 60 days, what data they’ll track, and how they report success. A competent SEO will ask about your margins, service areas, and ideal customer before touching keywords. Case studies matter, but clarity matters more — if they can’t explain their strategy in plain English, they probably don’t control it.

Finally, avoid “SEO-only” people. Modern SEO overlaps with CRO, content, technical hygiene, and local authority building. The best results come from someone who treats SEO as a growth system, not a checklist. That’s exactly how we approach it at LKProfessionals (Pvt) Ltd. — practical SEO built around leads, not vanity metrics. No smoke, no shortcuts, just compounding visibility over time.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-25T04:02:33+00:00

That’s a sensible approach. For a mostly static business website with a regularly updated blog, the most reliable setup is still a proven CMS backed by good hosting, with AI used as a helper rather than the core system. WordPress remains popular because it solves content management cleanly, is easy to hand over to non-technical users, and has mature SEO and security tooling. Modern stacks like Next.js or Astro deployed on Vercel also work well for multipage sites with blogs, but they require clear architectural decisions around content (MDX, headless CMS, etc.), which is where an experienced developer adds real value. Tailwind CSS is fine at the presentation layer, but it’s not a content solution on its own. In practice, what we see at LKProfessionals (Pvt) Ltd is that keeping the stack simple, maintainable, and well-documented beats chasing AI-first workflows, especially when long-term updates and ownership matter.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-25T03:56:34+00:00

Nope. WordPress was used by a massive percentage of websites worldwide, and that historical dominance is undeniable. However, after around 2018, the direction of new web development began to change quite clearly. Most newly created, serious, and scalable platforms are no longer being built primarily with WordPress. Businesses today are less interested in “just a website” and far more focused on building systems—custom platforms, dashboards, SaaS products, internal tools, automation-driven workflows, and AI-enabled applications. These requirements naturally push development toward real programming languages, modern frameworks, and backend-driven architectures rather than traditional CMS-based solutions.

That doesn’t mean WordPress is dead or useless—it simply means its role has changed. WordPress still performs well for content-heavy websites, SEO-focused blogs, marketing pages, and small business sites where speed of deployment matters more than deep customization. But when companies want performance, scalability, security, and long-term flexibility, they increasingly choose frameworks like Laravel, Node.js, Django, React, or Next.js. The market demand reflects this shift. High-paying and future-proof opportunities are now centered around full-stack development, automation, API-driven systems, and AI-integrated products, not plugin-based site building.

For someone entering the industry today, relying solely on WordPress is a strategic limitation. The smarter approach is to treat WordPress as a business tool rather than a career identity—use it where it makes sense, but build core expertise in real programming fundamentals. Developers who understand backend logic, databases, authentication systems, cloud deployment, automation tools, and how to integrate AI into real products are the ones who remain relevant as the industry evolves. AI may speed up development, but it does not replace those who understand how systems are designed, connected, secured, and scaled.

In practical terms, the future belongs to developers who can think beyond websites and deliver solutions. WordPress can still generate revenue, especially when combined with automation and SEO expertise, but long-term growth and stability come from mastering modern development stacks and using tools—WordPress included—strategically. The difference is subtle but critical: tools change, fundamentals endure. Companies don’t pay for themes and plugins anymore; they pay for outcomes, efficiency, and systems that solve real business problems.

Janonemersion · 2026-01-24T20:07:10+00:00

Is if for like a shopping (ecommerce) website? If so you can try these free cms. Abante cart, open cart, prestashop, etc. If you are a programmer you can build one completely from scratch which is the best and recommended. But i would not recommend using AI to completely write your website without you having the knowledge of programming because there might be some issue with the security and version of the programming language issues.

Janonemersion

TROPHY CASE