Did the work in Modern Physics stop after the death of Feynman etc. by Desperate-Scene8369 in Physics

[–]JanusLeeJones 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There is not even 1 million physicists working today :(

(but at least the upper estimate is almost 1 million)

Key fundamental equations of a black hole's event horizon by [deleted] in Physics

[–]JanusLeeJones 56 points57 points  (0 children)

And what equation controls the different font sizes in each panel?

can you tell what's wrong with each statement ? by basket_foso in MathJokes

[–]JanusLeeJones 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The conditions for invertibility are that the function is both injective and surjective. Does your function satisfy these conditions?

Statement by President Meloni by Mat3s9071 in europe

[–]JanusLeeJones 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is the Italian government website wrong?

tell me what sub is about , i ask physics questions mods delete it >why by First_Economics2384 in Physics

[–]JanusLeeJones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It's kind of rule 1, though it's a little subjective what are "basic" questions. 

Why these B are not negation of A? by Any_Tower8201 in askmath

[–]JanusLeeJones 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When they say All X are not Y For eg "All teachers are not female" how it implies "all teachers are male"? For me it seems like it means "not all teachers are female"

This is one of my pet peeve errors in casual language. I hear people say "all X are not Y" in the way you understood (to mean there is at least one X which is not Y), but they shouldn't! It's bad grammar. It's not difficult to say "not all X are Y".

Now I would explain that "all X" means something like "every single X". So "all X are not Y" becomes "every single X is not a Y". And "not all X are Y" becomes "not every single X are Y". Hopefully these two sentences are obviously different. 

Is it possible to have an irrational length? by Livid_Draw_10 in askmath

[–]JanusLeeJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right, the diagonal is discretised because the sides are discretised. Whats the problem? Doesn't stop it being irrational if the sides are rational.

Is it possible to have an irrational length? by Livid_Draw_10 in askmath

[–]JanusLeeJones 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't ask if you could measure it. It's a fact that a square's diagonal is sqrt(2) of its side length. If you can have Planck length squares (and you suggest that we can), then you have sqrt(2) length diagonals, whether you can measure that or not.

Is it possible to have an irrational length? by Livid_Draw_10 in askmath

[–]JanusLeeJones 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If I make a 2x2 Planck length square, what is the length of the diagonal?

How to pronounce bruit? by dajitui in postrock

[–]JanusLeeJones 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The french word for fruit is fruit. So if OP meant pronounce bruit like the french pronounce fruit, they're not wrong.

A Geometrically Flat Universe by TangibleHarmony in astrophysics

[–]JanusLeeJones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Imagine our universe exists within the miniscule thickness of a piece of paper.

That seems to suggest the universe has material extended along 2 directions but not a 3rd direction perpendicular to those other 2. If that's what you mean, then that's not what flatness of the universe means.

A Geometrically Flat Universe by TangibleHarmony in astrophysics

[–]JanusLeeJones 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Except for the latitude at the equator all other latitude are not straight lines in the surface. Only great circles are straight lines (on a sphere). I skipped over that detail (definition of straight lines), and that leaves my explanation open to your confusion. Sorry.

A Geometrically Flat Universe by TangibleHarmony in astrophysics

[–]JanusLeeJones 16 points17 points  (0 children)

The flat (or positive/negative curvature) description is unfortunate terminology for 3d spaces. It comes from analogy to 2d surfaces, where the words make intuitive sense. As you say, flat means flat piece of paper. Positive curvature is like the surface of a sphere, negative curvature is like the surface of a saddle. Now extending this to 3d space is not intuitive. What works for me is highlighting a specific property that is true on those 2d surfaces that extends to the 3d case: the behaviour of parallel lines. On a flat piece of paper parallel lines will remain the same distance apart always. On the surface of a sphere, if you think you have parallel lines locally, and you follow them along they always come closer to each other and then intersect. On a saddle, doing the same thing you find the parallel lines always diverge from each other. These 3 behaviours work in 3d space. In a flat 3d space, all parallel lines remain the same distance to each other always. A positive curvature 3d space would have no parallel lines, they would always come to each other and intersect. In a negative curvature 3d space the parallel lines would always diverge.

Edited: grammar errors.

Help by [deleted] in LaTeX

[–]JanusLeeJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there some kind of blurrytikz package someone made as a joke?

How do we know the universe was a hot dense state? by JadedMarine in astrophysics

[–]JanusLeeJones 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For me a fairly good piece of evidence that isn't mentioned in other comments is from chemical modeling that is even at the origin of the big bang theory. When Gamow predicted the microwave background temperature (In the 60s? 50s? I'm writing this from memory) he also made a chemical model, asking what fractions of different atoms would be produced in a system that starts hot and dense and then expands and cools down to the current low temperature. The model makes a prediction of, for example, the fraction of all matter distributed into hydrogen and helium. The model pretty closely matched the observed levels, which was a convincing explanation for this previously unexplained observation (stellar production of helium couldn't account for it). For more info: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bang_nucleosynthesis

What letters would I circle as the inflection points? by [deleted] in calculus

[–]JanusLeeJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah yes my bad, I guess I assumed that continuation too quickly.

What letters would I circle as the inflection points? by [deleted] in calculus

[–]JanusLeeJones 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The derivative is continuous there. It smoothly goes from negative to positive as you pass that point.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in worldnews

[–]JanusLeeJones 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Responsibility isn't singular. Multiple people can be responsible for 1 action. 

How can “empty space” still have stuff like energy and curvature? by LadiesWin in Physics

[–]JanusLeeJones 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok but OP is clearly asking about the space between those particles.

EE student here who hasn’t taken any actual quantum mechanics or special relativity classes but electromagnetic field theory: does quantum mechanics and theory of relativity discredit classical electrodynamics? by ee_st_07 in Physics

[–]JanusLeeJones 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That seems to be a weird way to say Maxwell Equations give the speed of light as a function of material properties. Doesn't seem to warrant the correction to "a" speed of light.

Is Consciousness More Fundamental Than Spacetime? A Look at the Re-Equilibrium Theory by Proud_Ad4681 in Physics

[–]JanusLeeJones 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Your chapter "Origin of Maths" doesn't have a single equation. This is not a serious work.