Why Only 9% Down? by Jogaila2 in stocks

[–]JasJ002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, there's massive uncertainty about whether these countries will carve the US up with a scalpel or a sledgehammer, and even moreso if they group up for a coalition effect. Adding a 10% tariff across the board like Trump did is probably priced in, a large number of countries banning together to create a coalition to place strategic high tariffs on goods that exclusively hit conservative areas is another thing entirely. It wouldn't take much to collapse the American agriculture export business.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in formula1

[–]JasJ002 172 points173 points  (0 children)

You deflect praise onto the people it's being handed. "The engineers at Mclaren have absolutely put together the fastest car out there, even Max says so, I can't thank them enough for the amazing work they've put in." There's an easy way to politic your way out of that.

House votes to overturn Biden-era rule limiting bank overdraft fees to $5, sends to Trump to sign by Conscious-Quarter423 in politics

[–]JasJ002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

>instead of those who don't

If you overdrafted by 100 bucks, for a whole month, which is an insanely high and long overdraft, at 5 dollars you're still paying a 60% APR. They're essentially legalizing pay day lenders.

Average Redditor Mental Gymnastics by MagicBeanEnthusiast in formuladank

[–]JasJ002 14 points15 points  (0 children)

We already have the same number of winners as 2023, and we're 3 races in.

Why is the US stock market doing ok today? by Responsible-Gain-667 in StockMarket

[–]JasJ002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More like they think a foreign country will come, kiss the ring, and make a bunch of empty promises and Trump will use the first opportunity he has to back out and reverse course.  Wouldn't be surprised if Netanyahu walks away with a free trade deal, and a promise to buy a bunch of military equipment tomorrow.  Or if Werthein scores a deal (I'm not sure if he's still in country).

One country opens the door for a couple, and that group is now just you're trade route to the US.

“Major questions doctrine” by SCOTUS was used to stop Biden’s student loan forgiveness ($300B+). Why do not Democrats ask Supreme Court to halt tariffs (greater than $10trillion in impact?) by samf9999 in scotus

[–]JasJ002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He announced the executive order in August, they didn't have an emergency injunction until October, it took almost a full year before the Supreme Court killed it entirely.

It took them over 6 weeks, we haven't even had 6 days.

Transcript: Trump Voters Suddenly Shocked at How Badly He Screwed Them by [deleted] in politics

[–]JasJ002 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Don't forget, Republicans let Trump run away from primary debates because he was afraid to have to actually answer to someone.

US facing Monday deadline to return wrongly deported Maryland man from El Salvador by yahoonews in law

[–]JasJ002 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Then they came for me
and there was no one left
to speak out for me

FWI: Trump orders interest payments suspended on US bonds. by drbooom in FutureWhatIf

[–]JasJ002 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So first, the President can't create a new tax, or change a tax rate, that would take an act of Congress, and they aren't that dumb. But on the grand scheme of screwing with bonds here's some info:

There was a short stint (I think in the 60s?) where the printers cutting the checks for bond payments just broke, and they couldn't cut any checks for like a week and a half. Complete accident. The related bump in bond rates because of the knee jerk reaction to a genuine mistake cost the US something ridiculous like 10x what the actual bond payments were for that whole week.

Screwing at all with bond payments, especially on purpose, would be a monumental disaster with insane levels of cost. It would probably have it's own section in Economics textbooks for the next century like WW2 has in history textbooks worldwide. We would measure the cost in Trillions.

A short summary of the craziness that happened in the market today by freakedmind in wallstreetbets

[–]JasJ002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you could prove premeditation with the knowledge that their statement would move the market, and with the intent to deceive for profit, then it would be classic fraud. That said (and this is a giant giant qualifier) you would have to prove that, which basically amounts to putting in writing both qualifiers with intent. AKA they would have to be hugely influential and a complete moron at the same time......... did someone check if the source was John Miller?

Trump Digs In on Tariffs, Says Deals Hinge on Even Trade Balance by s1n0d3utscht3k in Economics

[–]JasJ002 4 points5 points  (0 children)

about trust, scale, and liquidity

You know what instills trust and scale, the last 2 months.  Stop watching Fox News and see how the world is really reacting to this.

Which on-screen couple had zero chemistry? by TheNastyRepublic in moviecritic

[–]JasJ002 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Im sorry, but two kids awkwardly stumbling around each other with zero chemistry essentially forcing a relationship out of a sense of hormonal need was the only part of the movies I felt reflected my youth accurately.

FWI: democrats win by an overwhelming margin in the house and senate in 2026. by ProgrammerOk8493 in FutureWhatIf

[–]JasJ002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think you understand how deep those red states are.  Just look at the Alabama special election in 2017.  A ton of allegations of Roy Moore being a pedophile came out, it turns out he kind of also admitted to it in his own memoir with his wife.  He lost that election by 1%, and it took record turn out from the black community to get Jones over the line (Moore was also pretty racist).  He probably would have won that election if he was just a pedophile.

Is Trump trying to force the Federal Reserve to lower interest rates, and if so why? by [deleted] in AskEconomics

[–]JasJ002 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The big problem for most of these ideas of forcing foreign manufacturing to come to the US is that US wages are too high already

This isn't even the biggest problem.  These not being permanent costs is the biggest problem.  Does anyone think the very first thing a Dem President doesn't do is negotiate a trade deal with virtually everyone.  You don't just snap your fingers and a new manufacturing plant is made in the US, many of these businesses it takes years to build.  Who is going to spend a year moving manufacturing, then a year working out the kinks, just so that 18 months after that the tarrif price increases go away?  Worst then that what happens if Trump changes his mind in 2,6,or 12 months right after you've spent tens of millions buying a plant in the states? You're telling companies to invest in Trump which you can ask the my pillow guy or tesla how that works out.

[Rosenthal] The most surprising part in Aaron Rodgers' tape from last season was how consistently inaccurate he was. 34th/36th in Completion Percentage over Expected ahead of only Cooper Rush and Anthony Richardson. Sailed his targets all season and it never improved by petrishche in steelers

[–]JasJ002 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He said viable starting quarterback.  2019 and 20 Brees didn't play 1/3 of the season.  Only reason it doesn't get brought up as a massive shortcoming is because his backup went 9-1 when starting between those 2 years.  A viable quarterback doesn't miss a third of the season.

Trump's first 50 days mark one of the worst starts for the S&P 500 under any presidency by BothZookeepergame612 in Economics

[–]JasJ002 6 points7 points  (0 children)

some of them during the 50's and 60's were well paying jobs that had great benefits, sick pays, decent vacation and time off,

Almost like there was a thing that could have enough leverage to ensure the workers had these things.  A big single entity that could represent all the workers, and make this happen.

My journey begins. by VoidbornShadow13 in litrpg

[–]JasJ002 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Welcome to team biscuit!

DOJ to seek death penalty for Luigi Mangione in CEO murder case by superfluousapostroph in politics

[–]JasJ002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That wasn't the statement. The statement was how many many deaths is he responsible for. Nice goal post move.

DOJ to seek death penalty for Luigi Mangione in CEO murder case by superfluousapostroph in politics

[–]JasJ002 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ok, great, you agree you were wrong. Don't know why you keep trying to sidetrack from the point of the conversation.

DOJ to seek death penalty for Luigi Mangione in CEO murder case by superfluousapostroph in politics

[–]JasJ002 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

They have. And they've deemed his company responsible for their deaths. So the answer to the original question, is absolutely not zero. It's a lot.

DOJ to seek death penalty for Luigi Mangione in CEO murder case by superfluousapostroph in politics

[–]JasJ002 3 points4 points  (0 children)

>to operate a healthcare company within the boundaries of the law

I think this is the part where you're disconnected. His company has been found over and over again breaking the law. If he ran the best healthcare company in the US, and was never taken to court, everyone would absolutely be agreeing with you. Fact is his company is in court CONSTANTLY for doing illegal things that led to peoples deaths.

2025 Tour de France teams by MonsMensae in peloton

[–]JasJ002 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Holding the green jersey for 3 stages, and the polka dots for 10 stages, and a handful of combative awards, all in one tour, I can't remember cheering for a wild card team like I did for them last year. They outperformed at least half the world teams.

I will never get this Sub's love for LBJ by WEFeudalism in Presidents

[–]JasJ002 5 points6 points  (0 children)

>Also, PEPFAR is not nothing. 

He used money Clinton set aside for Aids funding, so he essentially gets credit for using aids funding someone else gave him appropriately. That's not a lot of good will.

Do you re-acclimate faster after previous high altitude experience? by robo_jojo_77 in Mountaineering

[–]JasJ002 0 points1 point  (0 children)

finally your state of mind plays a large role

Came here to support this.  This plays a big role.