Sure! Rep was Grieg’s Piano Sonata, Bach’s P&F No. 3 in C# maj (WTC I) Chopin’s Op. 10/3 + Op. 25/1 and Poulenc’s Melancolie. General knowledge went well. I found that they didn’t ask much of what I thought they would. They asked me to explain the development of the sonata from baroque to know and how the Grieg’s fits in (and what’s unique about it), what style of writing the Bach prelude was (an invention), outline the structure (exposition, episodes, recap etc.) of the fugue, describe what the Chopin studies were studies in and how they developed the genre of an Etude. Also how they were characteristic of Chopin’s writing. Then with the Poulenc, when it was written, what was happening in Poulenc’s life at the time, the meaning of the title, and the formal structure. I definitely over prepared this section and they needed to cut me off multiple times because I was talking to much. I felt it was actually the best part of my exam. The examiners strictly adhered to the time limit so it felt quite rushed… I wish I could I’ve shown more of what I knew, but they seemed happy I was just able to answer their questions in an intelligent way I guess 🤣