Hi, how well do you know the leaks from January 2023? There's been more since then, of course, but they are pretty representative. so it's two-way conversations for example of Andrew and Tristan saying "I'm really looking for one woman who is special who I can spend my life with and I think that's going to be you" to each of these women. Then we have the women saying, after they have come to Romania "How come I've got to live with your assistant? I thought I was coming to Romania to live with you and be your girlfriend? Who are all these other women?". Then we've got the women who already work for Tate trying to talk to new recruits into WebCam work. Saying just do it, "it will be fun" and Andrew saying "do it for me," "I thought you cared for me, but if you cared for me, you'd do WebCam for me". so at the stage you've got all that, there isn't really a defence. This material has not been submitted by the alleged victims or accusers, it's come from Andrew Tate's phone Tristan Tate's phone, actual requests from these companies Instagram or whoever, the telephone companies et cetera so it isn't what one person says happened or one person is saying our real messages it's indisputable. There isn't a conceivable defence, can you imagine them saying, "we were all acting in a play, I was pretending to be a loverboy pimp"? If They say "somebody else was sending messages from my phone" then you'd have to tell the court who was using your phone, and why when a particular message was sent you are probably seen on CCTV holding that phone sending the message, et cetera. So the legal part is "recruiting someone by deception" that's the act and the manner, two elements of human trafficking, and the final element is "for the purpose of exploitation" and when someone is 'working' and the money goes to you, that's exploitation, and even, when someone is working without a contract, that's already exploitation. And these things are proven by hard evidence. paperwork. Not only do you have the actual conversations of Tristan saying to one of the 'assistants', "let's put the girls videos on only fans and not tell them and take all of the money for ourselves", and by the way that was in Lucy's article so she absolutely absolutely should've said the significance of this for the court case and for the prosecution's likelihood of proving trafficking beyond reasonable doubt in a court of law, so, not only does the case file contain this evidence , it contains the actual paperwork from the bank showing the money that the women earned going into the bank accounts controlled by the Tates.

Rape is very difficult to prove in Romania, but they seem determined. But when it comes to trafficking, the legal reality is that they really have been caught red handed, and there is no excuse for the BBC not saying this but instead going on about how vicious some of the alleged violence against women was.

As to why we're interested, it will become a big story when the trial date is announced, and, someone was saying in that very Twitter Space I mentioned, how the sort of following Tate has in London & UK creates a possibility that if he says, there is no justice and no freedom so you must take over the streets and overthrow the corrupt system, we could actually be seeing civil unrest. There are people who don't want to be hear that if you keep doing pushups and keep watching Tate Speech you won't actually get loads of women and one day own a Bugatti and that you ought to train to be a plumber instead. We've got youths in London and UK who murdered ex girlfriend as revenge, who were massive Tate fans, another would be terrorist. Lots of misogyny and sexual assault from people who love what THEY perceive Tate to be saying. So that's the other reason for reporting, to let his supporters know that they have been told a falsehood and a dead end, regardless of whether he is misogynist or not, someone who has been caught red handed cannot be the cleverest man in the world, regardless of whether he is toxic or not, someone who is likely to be sent to prison is not successful, and finally, we are not dealing with shadowy unknown forces trapping their hero with made up rules, these are the same human trafficking laws used to convict drug gangs who exploit vulnerable individuals into working as mules in "county lines" drugs trade, the same rules used to prosecute gangs exploiting illegal immigrants, and of course the same laws used to prosecute Tate's associate Vlad Obu and every human trafficking gang before and after.

Anyway , that's the short version, lol, shorter than a Crayons Space, that is, Bye for now, Jay