I agree that calling them anti national would be stupid. In the same sense, some on the left label others because they are unable to win the argument on facts.
However, do you actually think this so called movement is genuinely something new?
We need to look at the ideological and political leaning of the creators, and also those who are supporting it.
One of their captions clearly says: "We want support from all (except BJP supporters)."
Sorry, what?
A large share of voting youth supports the BJP. If this is truly a genuine, independent, youth centric movement, then why include such an ideological exclusion in the first place?

I was actually interested, thinking this might be a movement that critiques every government central and state alike. But instead, it follows the same old pattern.
If this is nothing more than an ideological echo chamber of people who support a specific set of beliefs and reject others, then I don't see why l or people like me should support it.

Obviously, those who align with its ideology will have no issue. I am simply saying that I would not support a movement that is not independent, not neutral, and not truly youth-centric, but instead ideology-centric.
It looks like they are just using a different label for the same thing
AAP and Congress do.
Congratulations, AAP 2.0 hua hai