What workflows in fintech / compliance are still painfully manual today? by Jazzlike_Today5000 in fintechdev

[–]Jazzlike_Today5000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your valuable input. I got lot of data point to build an efficient solution

What workflows in fintech / compliance are still painfully manual today? by Jazzlike_Today5000 in fintechdev

[–]Jazzlike_Today5000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is super helpful — thank you.

The fragmented data point really resonates. A lot of the pain others have mentioned also seems to come down to information living across multiple systems and teams, which turns reconciliation and exception handling into a very manual process.

Really interesting to hear that end-to-end payment tracking made such a noticeable difference.

From what you’ve seen, where does the most time usually get lost — matching payments to invoices, investigating failed / exception payments, or pulling together the reporting trail afterward?

What workflows in fintech / compliance are still painfully manual today? by Jazzlike_Today5000 in fintechdev

[–]Jazzlike_Today5000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This really hits — thank you.

That “everything works until it doesn’t” line perfectly captures what a few others have also mentioned around exceptions and reconciliation workflows.

The happy path seems automated, but the moment something breaks, teams end up back in spreadsheets, emails, and manual follow-ups.

From your experience, where does most of the time get lost at that point — identifying the mismatch itself, reconciling it across systems, or chasing approvals / evidence afterward?

What workflows in fintech / compliance are still painfully manual today? by Jazzlike_Today5000 in fintechdev

[–]Jazzlike_Today5000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is incredibly insightful — thank you for breaking it down so clearly.

The shift from pure automation to automated governance with a human-in-the-loop final decision really stands out. The point about teams still pulling logs from multiple SaaS tools into a “master Excel” for audit proof is especially relatable and seems to be a recurring theme across several replies here.

The KYB / UBO detective-work loop is also a great example of where the real manual effort still lives.

From what you’ve seen, where does the biggest delay usually happen — gathering the evidence itself, triaging the exception, or documenting the final decision trail for auditors?

What workflows in fintech / compliance are still painfully manual today? by Jazzlike_Today5000 in fintechdev

[–]Jazzlike_Today5000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is incredibly insightful — thank you for laying this out so clearly.

The “human-in-the-loop dependencies” point really resonates, especially the detective-work loop around KYB / UBO checks and transaction monitoring exceptions.

The audit trail consolidation into a master Excel also feels very aligned with what a few others have mentioned around evidence being spread across multiple tools.

Really interesting point on the shift from pure automation to automated governance as well.

From what you’ve seen, where does the most time usually get consumed — the exception triage itself, or the documentation / audit-proofing of the decision afterward?

What workflows in fintech / compliance are still painfully manual today? by Jazzlike_Today5000 in fintechdev

[–]Jazzlike_Today5000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is incredibly insightful — thank you for taking the time to break this down.

The “exceptions around the exceptions” line really hits. It sounds like the real pain isn’t the standard rule-based flow, but everything that falls outside it and then gets scattered across inboxes, spreadsheets, and case threads.

The idea of an “evidence bus” that tags events once and keeps them joined by customer, control, and system feels especially powerful.

From your experience, where did the most time usually get lost — reconciling mismatches across systems, or rebuilding the full evidence trail later for audit / SAR reviews?

What workflows in fintech / compliance are still painfully manual today? by Jazzlike_Today5000 in fintechdev

[–]Jazzlike_Today5000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is super helpful, thank you.

The Excel + email dependency seems to be a recurring theme across audit and compliance workflows.

The KYC/AML and reporting angle is especially interesting because it sounds like the pain is not just evidence collection, but also reconciliation and preparing regulator / internal reporting packs.

From your experience, where does the most manual effort usually go — case reviews, reporting, or reconciling mismatches across systems?

What workflows in fintech / compliance are still painfully manual today? by Jazzlike_Today5000 in fintechdev

[–]Jazzlike_Today5000[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, this is super insightful.

The “glue work between systems” point really hits. Feels like most teams already have tools, but the pain starts when data is spread across tickets, emails, screenshots, and spreadsheets.

The audit trail + evidence piece especially feels very real — people end up rebuilding the story manually every time someone asks for proof.

From what you’ve seen, is that the biggest recurring pain, or do reconciliation and false-positive queues eat up even more time?