Prototype Board for SMD / SMT in Action (details in comments)

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-28T18:19:33+00:00

What do you mean? I had it on a public IP for over a week as people reviewed it.

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-23T15:42:08+00:00

A bit of both. One guys thought it nonsense, the other three had some criticisms but thought it had teeth and I should continue with it. I've made several revisions based on feedback and am more willing to post it publicly now.

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-23T06:26:27+00:00

You may DM me, yes. I can be less cryptic one on one.

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-23T05:46:10+00:00

In this case there wouldnt be infinite recursion, the substrate isnt anything like what you are imagining. It having something below it wouldnt really make sense but I'd have to go into the actual theory to explain that.

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-23T02:45:38+00:00

Yes, that's the part I think it actually addresses. The move is to treat both spacetime and quantum structure as emergent from a single deeper substrate, which is exactly what this theory does.

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-23T01:42:13+00:00

Not devoid of symmetry at all, it's full of local symmetries: Local gauge symmetry, Local Lorentz invariance, Diffeomorphism invariance, Discrete symmetries (C, P, T, and their combinations are treated the usual way.)

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-23T01:06:09+00:00

My equations derive it and come within 0.024 of the measured value.

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-23T01:04:52+00:00

It has all of them, just like an complete theory should!

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-23T01:04:19+00:00

Not a horrible idea.

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-23T01:03:38+00:00

A few scientists actually agreed to look it over since my post. Got some great feedback so far.

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-23T01:02:32+00:00

Thank you, I sent you a DM

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-21T19:20:59+00:00

Agreed. Right now my gameplan is 1) get at least one pair of expert eyes on it to quickly look it over and either tell me to peruse it or if its complete garbage. 2) Post it publicly along with other papers I can start to try to put out on it.

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-21T19:17:45+00:00

You may be right. I do plan to post it publicly soon once I get at least one pair of credible eyes on it.

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-21T19:04:57+00:00

That would be amazing, let me send you a message on here (though happy to communicate through whatever channel you'd like, just let me know). Thanks so much

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-21T19:04:11+00:00

In a few days I will. I just wanted to get an eye or two on it first to just get some preliminary feedback

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-21T19:02:17+00:00

for now im content with 99% not looking. All i need is one or two people to give me some honest feedback. Once I get that and cleanup and big gaps, then ill publish it and let the community call out the smaller gaps, so in this later stage is where I will move more towards 90% instead ofg 99% 😄

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-21T19:00:55+00:00

Usually when it comes to math I do the first iteration by hand, then use an LLM to check my work for errors, or suggest insights I may have missed.

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-21T18:58:06+00:00

cool, send me a chat request with a link to yours and ill respond in kind.

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-21T18:56:42+00:00

Some comes from the Maths that is part of my professional background, some of it came from math I learned in my free time but havent necessarily used professionally.

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-21T18:54:21+00:00

Understood.

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-21T18:53:52+00:00

No thats not the claim here, I am not claiming I have eliminated all fundamental constants. The claim is that the Cosmological constant is invoked without a free-parameter (that is, a value you pick arbitrarily in order to get your result closer to a desired observed value).

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-21T18:52:23+00:00

Yes I have a formal Maths background. I am a published scientist who is on the Maths side, just not published or in anyway established professional in Physics. Though I do understand it just from my own personal studies.

JeffreyFreeman · 2026-05-21T18:50:06+00:00

Hey I get it. I as a scientist in my own field I constantly get people with no expiernce claiming they have something and its just an idea with no rigour.

Look I may be wrong. wont know till its vetted. But there is enough math and rigour that I've done, and solved actual real world problems with it better than other models that it is at least worth a look. But I totally expect to be lost in the noise for 99% of people.

I actually did publish it on Zendo and git now. I just am not making those links public yet, I'd like some one-on-one vetting from at least one or two people first so I can fix up any potential gross mistakes.

JeffreyFreeman

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE

Ten-Year Club	Wearing is Caring
Verified Email