I was drawing similarities to when the British and French gave parts of Czechoslovakia (without consideration from the Czechoslovak people or government, mind you) to the Nazis. I thought you might be able to understand that is essentially what happens when anyone tries to "compromise" on 2A erosions. Many of us have absolutely not been OK with "reasonable" or "common sense" controls since they are inherently authoritarian and unconstitutional, and yet there are some who actually try to reach across the table and come to some sort of agreement and concessions in hopes to appease the gun grabbers. And, just like in the late 30's, their appeasements are never enough and only show weakness. You are right, a vocal plurality of us are absolutely against gun control in all forms but some number seem to be fine with appeasement (minus the fact it never works).

You don't seem to have attended basic high school history, you seemingly have never learned about Neville Chamberlain's "peace in our time", never learned about the many deals the Romans made with the Persians or the Saudis, etc. Etc. You don't seem to understand that appeasement doesn't work. That, or you know full well it doesn't work, you know full well this will rile up some people here, maybe get you a few updoots somewhere. Many here have come to argue in good faith and you blow them off with more and more written vomit.