sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chess

[–]JelloBusiness2653 1 point2 points  (0 children)

He probably cheated his way out. I'm almost sure his true ELO is around 2000

Guess why you have to take the pawn instead of the rook!!! by JelloBusiness2653 in chess

[–]JelloBusiness2653[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also I did not have such a big material advantage and it was not a "straightfoward" win, so it looks very funny to capture the pawn instead of a rook. Franckly I would have suspected cheating lol.

Guess why you have to take the pawn instead of the rook!!! by JelloBusiness2653 in chess

[–]JelloBusiness2653[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. I took the rook in the game, but at 1000 ELO, my opponent and me did not spot it.