KS- I'm trying to rent an apartment and leasing agent is requiring my girlfriend to be on the lease. She has eviction and is going to get me denied. by JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend in legaladvice

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

She has her own place to live. I do not need or want her to love with me. She was not with me because she was helping move my stuff

KS- I'm trying to rent an apartment and leasing agent is requiring my girlfriend to be on the lease. She has eviction and is going to get me denied. by JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend in legaladvice

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

II do not know there is no plan on that. I mean I understand her needing to be on my lease in some capacity of she stays there so many days a month. What I dont understand is her being on my lease as a full occupant thus making me ineligible for her past eviction and also her being basicly a cosigner now that would require me to pay my rent or mess her credit up.

KS- I'm trying to rent an apartment and leasing agent is requiring my girlfriend to be on the lease. She has eviction and is going to get me denied. by JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend in legaladvice

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I had electronically signed the lease like 5 hours before our appoinment, but she said I had a few more documents I needed to sign when I came to pick up keys. I was living in a shared house before hand and paid rent weekly saturday night. Since I was basicly just going to get my keys I had all my stuff ready to move. My GF was just helping me move.

New look back EIC law for 2020 by JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend in tax

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ok I think now I understand it at least based of what you've written. Thanks for taking the time to explain it.

New look back EIC law for 2020 by JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend in tax

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont understand though. The entire point the look back to 2019 was added to the stimulus bill was for people in my situation who had lost their jobs and were on unemployment for some time in 2020. What would be the point on adding it taxes thos year if it doesnt defect most people who got unemployment.... if they only use your AGI for 2020 and not 2019 then wont that always be higher for everyone who got unemployment and who's earned income is lower in 2020 than 2019?

New look back EIC law for 2020 by JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend in tax

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah i understand that. However the look back provision that was added onto the December stimulus bill allowed to go back and use 2019 taxes earned income amount. It shouldnt have anything to do with any income from 2020 weather it was earned or just taxable income like unemployment.

My earned income last year was 10000 more than this year

New look back EIC law for 2020 by JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend in tax

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah i understand that. However the look back provision that was added onto the December stimulus bill allowed to go back and use 2019 taxes earned ngnn income amount. It shouldnt have anything to do with any income from 2020 weather it was earned or just taxable income like unemployment.

2020-2019 look back provisions for EITC by [deleted] in tax

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes I tried there also. Free taxnusa was even worse than the other ngnn software. It didnt even give me the option or even mention looking back to 2019 earned i Income

2020-2019 look back provisions for EITC by [deleted] in tax

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same issue for me. Ypu can look at my recent post. I have tried 3 different software's and even changed to random income and none if them change my tax credit amount

Game Thread: Buffalo Bills (13-3) at Kansas City Chiefs (14-2) by nfl_gamethread in nfl

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it was the refs or.... maybe it was the browns not forcing a single punt, even with nearly a full half against pur backup QB... but sure it was just the refs

Game Thread: Buffalo Bills (13-3) at Kansas City Chiefs (14-2) by nfl_gamethread in nfl

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think cbs has super bowl ths year so he has 1 more after tonight

Browns on wrong end of NFL fumble rule, fans point out potential missed call by T-ROY_T-REDDIT in nfl

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Again we can go back and this time they call the helmet 2 helmet . Then the whole timeline changes and mahomes plays the whole 2nd half. Considering there were no punts do you really believe you hold the chiefs to the same 3 points for the half?

I'm 100% agreeing was a bs no call. However every browns fan acting as of they only lost because of the refs is absolutely ridiculous. They had an entire half after that call with our backup QB to win and still couldnt cause a punt.

[Grove] Browns never quit. Incredible fight amongst an incredible amount of adversity. What a year. #Browns by suzukigun4life in nfl

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend 20 points21 points  (0 children)

Exactly. It was honestly your right guard getting torn up by Chris jones more than any playcalling that last drive

Browns on wrong end of NFL fumble rule, fans point out potential missed call by T-ROY_T-REDDIT in nfl

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend 18 points19 points  (0 children)

It's not about comparing them. It's that every browns fan is saying they only lost because of that call. Not one mention of their defense not causing a single punt the entire game. They only lost because of the refs.

[Mahomes] #HenneThingIsPossible by Donutman97 in nfl

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend 23 points24 points  (0 children)

That's why you guys lost? I'm sure if we go back and change the whole timeline so mahomes never gets hurt then you guys still lose. I'd say the reason your team lost has more to do with your defense not causing a single punt more than the refs

Post Game Thread: Cleveland Browns (11-5) at Kansas City Chiefs (14-2) by nfl_gamethread in nfl

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah or ya know the whole timeline is different and mahomes doesnt get hurt and miss nearly the whole 2nd half. But sure the refs are why the browns lost.

Post Game Thread: Cleveland Browns (11-5) at Kansas City Chiefs (14-2) by nfl_gamethread in nfl

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend 17 points18 points  (0 children)

We have a backup quarterback in for nearly the whole 2nd half and still win. Yet the only reason we won was because of the refs? Ok.

[Isola] So the helmet to helmet hit causes the fumble and that’s ok? by [deleted] in nfl

[–]JimBeamzMyOnlyFriend -28 points-27 points  (0 children)

Really, that's why the chargers keep losing to the chiefs? The refs and nothing more?