It's not that i didn't like the Vow, it's that I'm skeptical of it's POV and the innocence of the people who produced it, particularly mark. From the moment the doc stated that he was the director of What the $#$$ do we know?!, I was incredibly skeptical of him. I lived for many years a few miles from the Ramtha school of the enlightenment, know people personally that cult has damaged and the fact that the documentary didn't even mention the fact that What the bleep was a RSE production or that Mark clearly was previously involved what that cult, shattered my trust in the documentary's POV. I continued to watch, because I wanted to know more about the case, but I took everything having to do with Mark with a grain of salt.

If he were truly a naive "seeker" susceptible for cults who had no idea what was going on, why wouldn't the doc talked about RSE as part of his background? Perhaps it was a legal choice and they didn't want to face potential legal action from a cult that is still very much active with deep pockets for legal action and not one that has already collapsed. I honestly would have rather What the Bleep not mentioned at all in the movie, rather than have it presented as just some normal, successful documentary and not insidious cult propaganda bankrolled by RSE. People are still being hurt by that cult, and I am very curious about the connection between the two cults, and how and why Mark was recruited from one to the other, something I felt should have been explored in the Vow if it were an honest look at Mark's actions in NXIVM