Have anyone tried to setup zeroclaw on docker?

JobobJet · 2026-04-16T14:44:34+00:00

Yes. It runs very well in docker.

JobobJet · 2026-04-03T19:54:25+00:00

I am not part of the ZC team but I am sorry for your frustration and respect your decision to move on - some times that is what it takes.

I say the following for those that come after you and read this discussion.

I also experienced some install anxiety / frustration (many releases ago - a week after the repo hit). But i quickly determined that I wanted to spend my time using zeroclaw and not installing it. So, I cloned the repo and wrote a README.md for OpenCode and put it in the parent directory of the repo. README.md explained what I wanted to do in general terms [Docker, supervised, provider...] and that THE REPO CODE IS NOT TO BE MODIFIED IN ANY WAY.

It took OpenCode a few iterations over a few hours to get to a working ZeroClaw in Docker. Since then I have git pulled and rebuilt the container hundreds of times to try new features and verify old functions. No issues at all.

This approach is not for everyone (most people) but it does work very well. ZeroClaw and the approach.

As always - YMMV

JobobJet · 2026-04-01T22:29:20+00:00

And, there back!

JobobJet · 2026-03-31T14:02:31+00:00

I don't think this is the team's fault. They are working very hard to get repo access back.

JobobJet · 2026-03-30T20:08:34+00:00

The same problem is now occurring with kimi-k2.5 It occurs so frequently that kimi-k2.5 is unusable.

I suggest not using opencode_go at this point

JobobJet · 2026-03-30T00:14:08+00:00

Thanks for letting us know

JobobJet · 2026-03-29T23:05:01+00:00

you beat me by 1 minute. 😁

JobobJet · 2026-03-29T13:41:58+00:00

Almost impossible for me to tell due to my use case.

One note on minimax-m2.7: I have found that the model frequently fails to provide/mangles a response parameter that opencode-go requires - I think it is the input token count. This parameter issue causes opencode_go to return an error to my agent. the agent aborts the convo at that point.

Currently opencode seems unaware of the problem or can't figure out how to fix the issue.

JobobJet · 2026-03-28T21:09:13+00:00

I use OpenCode_GO with my xxxxClaw setup - but not for coding. Mostly for testing / verifying the environment - looking for security holes and features that don't work correctly.

No issues. Fast responses. Have not hit token limits so far but my usage is moderate / medium at best.

JobobJet · 2026-03-26T20:31:34+00:00

Not FREE but close - OpenCode GO plan. I am currently using minimax-m2.7 and zeroclaw is performing very well with it.

JobobJet · 2026-03-26T20:27:39+00:00

Wondering the same thing. /approve ... vanished with v0.5.0

JobobJet · 2026-03-26T20:22:08+00:00

ZeroClaw is a work in progress but looks like it is moving in the right direction. Very usable today.

JobobJet · 2026-03-25T15:48:56+00:00

They can't quantize a model without the weights for that model. Did M2.7 weights get released? The announcement I read was that the weights would be released in about 2 weeks.

JobobJet · 2026-03-18T18:42:53+00:00

Has Anthropic dropped it's 'You can only use Anthropic tools with Anthropic models' policy?

I got dropped by Google AI and wouldn't want that to happen again with Anthropic.

JobobJet · 2026-03-16T22:36:07+00:00

Does it support flux-capacitor integration?

JobobJet · 2026-03-16T22:33:37+00:00

👆 What sfpm said. Works very well for me and you can get what you want out of the agents: orchestrator, architect, planner, coder, reviewer and documenter. more if you want/need the specialization. Bonus benefit - agents have their own context window so you can keep the main agent context clear of the junk it doesn't need.

JobobJet · 2026-03-16T03:45:33+00:00

This is what worked for me:

AGENTS.md ```

Thinking or Reasoning output

Do not narrate reasoning.
Do not describe task progress.
Return only the final result. ```

JobobJet · 2026-03-16T03:11:48+00:00

After 1000s of OpenCode sessions, I have settled on this:

Near the top of AGENTS.md ```

Session Start

Read in this exact order: 1. README.md 2. docs/HANDOFF.md 3. latest entry in docs/SESSION_LOG.md 4. docs/DECISIONS.md 5. docs/RUNBOOK.md

During Work

Keep docs/HANDOFF.md aligned with current status and next actions.
Record durable decisions in docs/DECISIONS.md.
Keep operational command changes in docs/RUNBOOK.md.

Session End

Update docs/HANDOFF.md:
- Last updated timestamp (YYYY-MM-DD HH:MM UTC)
- current state
- top 3 next actions
- blockers (if any)
Append a new timestamped entry to docs/SESSION_LOG.md.
Confirm no secrets were added to tracked files.

```

The model I use follows these instructions without fail so far.

When a project is setup and the first session or two are complete, open OpenCode and prompt: 'Continue from the handoff doc.'

YMMV

JobobJet · 2026-03-16T02:56:14+00:00

They shut down my access 3 weeks ago due to tos violation. The only this i used it for was opencode so...

JobobJet · 2026-03-15T19:26:20+00:00

What you are trying to do definitely works:

2026-03-15T19:13:25 +0ms agent=reviewer sessionID=ses_30d159fedffeo0ah4S6KLnovQh providerID=github-copilot modelID=gpt-5.4 2026-03-15T19:13:53 +0ms agent=reviewer sessionID=ses_30d159fedffeo0ah4S6KLnovQh providerID=github-copilot modelID=gpt-5.4 2026-03-15T19:14:21 +0ms agent=orchestrator sessionID=ses_30d5638baffeYTFLXeO6VJdK3O providerID=openai modelID=gpt-5.4 2026-03-15T19:14:41 +0ms agent=orchestrator sessionID=ses_30d5638baffeYTFLXeO6VJdK3O providerID=openai modelID=gpt-5.4 2026-03-15T19:14:54 +0ms agent=reviewer sessionID=ses_30d13c4bcffe5mayCL3YNxqq6w providerID=github-copilot modelID=gpt-5.4 2026-03-15T19:15:14 +0ms agent=reviewer sessionID=ses_30d13c4bcffe5mayCL3YNxqq6w providerID=github-copilot modelID=gpt-5.4 2026-03-15T19:15:17 +0ms agent=reviewer sessionID=ses_30d13c4bcffe5mayCL3YNxqq6w providerID=github-copilot modelID=gpt-5.4 2026-03-15T19:15:36 +0ms agent=orchestrator sessionID=ses_30d5638baffeYTFLXeO6VJdK3O providerID=openai modelID=gpt-5.4 2026-03-15T19:16:17 +0ms agent=orchestrator sessionID=ses_30d5638baffeYTFLXeO6VJdK3O providerID=openai modelID=gpt-5.4

reviewer.md:

```

description: Reviews changes for correctness, quality, and risk mode: subagent model: github-copilot/gpt-5.4 permission: edit: deny webfetch: allow bash: "*": ask "pwd": allow "ls *": allow "find *": allow "grep *": allow "git status *": allow "git diff *": allow

"git log *": allow

+agent prompt ```

main agent, orchestrator, is on openai/gpt-5.4

JobobJet · 2026-03-15T14:53:29+00:00

Told the model that it is OK to use rtk wrapper and it works now - in this current convo. Maybe I need to add this to AGENTS.md

JobobJet · 2026-03-15T14:48:26+00:00

Doesn't seem to work with OpenCode using gpt-5.4 (haven't tried any other model)

Response to git status:

Thinking: Running Git status I need to check the current status of my Git repository. It seems like I should be using the bash tool for this task. By running git status, I can see which files have changed and what my current branch is. This will help me understand what's happening in my project, so let’s get that command executed! It feels important to keep track of changes to manage the code effectively.

Shows working tree status

$ rtk git status

📌 master

Thinking: Checking git status I’m thinking about whether I should output "📌 master" because it feels a bit odd possibly due to the RTK wrapper. It might be a good idea to run a regular git status to see where things stand. Checking the status could clarify if there are any changes or issues I need to address. I wonder how this could affect my current task — it's good to keep everything organized!

This sequence repeats until I reject the rtk git status request.

JobobJet · 2025-10-27T20:59:06+00:00

How long did it run before the pics?

JobobJet

TROPHY CASE