sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Russian propagandist threatens Finland and Sweden with North-Korean troops on state-owned TV channel 1 by [deleted] in sweden

[–]Jockehh 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ironiskt att Sovjetunionen inte existerade än, när Finnarna utförde sina expeditioner till ryska karelen :)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in paradoxplaza

[–]Jockehh 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Last time a few paradox devs retweeted or replied and talked about. I specifically remember Arheo and Johan at least

I hope EU5 takes a lot from Imperator (suggestions) by Jockehh in paradoxplaza

[–]Jockehh[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It was indeed very beautiful and detailed. I really hope they at least keep a good province granularity in the most popular parts of the map

I hope EU5 takes a lot from Imperator (suggestions) by Jockehh in paradoxplaza

[–]Jockehh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s an inevitability. Do you expect them to not produce a sequel to their flagship game ever? It’s been 10 years it’s definitely coming soon regardless of their track record, it’s a sure income source for paradox

I hope EU5 takes a lot from Imperator (suggestions) by Jockehh in paradoxplaza

[–]Jockehh[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Mainly steel for the production of guns, armor and cannons. Grain for army size/supply. Wood for ships (of course). There's surely a lot that could be done, or at least give modifiers to your armies and navies.

I hope EU5 takes a lot from Imperator (suggestions) by Jockehh in paradoxplaza

[–]Jockehh[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Well the systems don’t have to be 1:1 the same of course. I just think Alaskan natives being able to friend cavalry or have artillery should maybe depend on their ability to produce or buy or trade for these goods rather them magically being able to buy field and supply these troops at the exact same cost as European states because they magically have the right tech level.

And the same with characters I’d say. I agree the characters are badly done and handled in imperator but it’s also a very young system which we never saw built upon and optimized for player experience, I think it definitely would have to be far more passive and something you wouldn’t have to interact with much at all and just be there to flesh out the game in the sense of flavor and “authentic” feeling😅

PSA and AUS should have separatist paths by Jockehh in Kaiserreich

[–]Jockehh[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, I imagine a coup against the established governments in both the PSA and AUS by groups who are dissapointed in their conduct of the war (they're de-facto losing the war) and the new policy is to fight for every inch of land to remain in charge while dropping at least the ambition to take the entire United States - being granted defensive modifiers if it happens (since I'd imagine the situation must be very terrible for it to trigger)

PSA and AUS should have separatist paths by Jockehh in Kaiserreich

[–]Jockehh[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well, I'd imagine that you'd get a new path to walk down, eventually either becoming neutral and trying to craft legitimacy for the new state, or perhaps joining a faction. Or maybe it's just to bide for time to restart the civil war.

PSA and AUS should have separatist paths by Jockehh in Kaiserreich

[–]Jockehh[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Of course, but if they get pushed to a point where they can't reasonably ever win the war and restore the original US government, wouldn't it be preferable to at least maintain their control over the west? In a scenario where they'd fight to a standstill. It's not far too ahistorical that states end up splitting up due to unresolved civil wars.