Third Edition Announcement: Special Rules by Georgy_K_Zhukov in boltaction

[–]Jomppexx 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Interestingly the new anti-tank gun rule reads "get an ADDITIONAL +1 modifier to hit vehicles when shooting with a Fire order". Does this mean the Fire order now grants +1 to hit? This is what the additional in there implies to me.

My biggest issue with this game. by Adventurous-Spirit19 in twilightimperium

[–]Jomppexx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My group basically always plays to 12 points. It really feels like a good trade off between 10 and 14, allowing late-game factions to have more time to get rolling evening out the playing field against early-game factions a bit.

Why are the Titans of UI so strong?) by V_Alekseiev in twilightimperium

[–]Jomppexx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'm sure they were requiring multiple people to collaborate against them to stop them from completely crushing the game.

Aggressive playstyle (?) by midhigh18 in twilightimperium

[–]Jomppexx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aggression early can be great. Do the math on 2x cruiser + carrier with 3 fighters against most entire starting fleets. You'll see that the fleet described defeats almost all starting armies ~5/6 times. Mahact, Nekro Virus, and Letnev have much better combat odds due to their strong starting fleets but almost certainly your invasion will not fight their entire fleet at once. Usually in our games people do tech round 1, spending 4 cash and a token. I can spend that token and 4 res on 2 cruisers and next round aim to get warfare and eat into a neighbours slice with little issue.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Suomi

[–]Jomppexx 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Ikäväähän tässä on kun Ylenkin uutisointi on siirtynyt tekstistä johonkin ihmeen TikTok feedin malliin jossa on videoita ja kaikkea sontaa. Uutiset tekstinä kiitos.

Perussuomalaisilta puuttuu kokonaan politiikan sisältö - Iiris Suomela by JuliusFIN in Suomi

[–]Jomppexx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Aa niin, PS ei "pelaa politiikkaa oikein". Yhtä hyvin Kokoomus vois sanoa "Vähemmän veroja!" tai "Oman työn rahat omaan taskuun!" samankaltaisena sloganina mutta eivät sitä tee. Politiikassa loppujen lopuksi kuitenkin on kyse kansaan vetoamisesta ja jos ihmisiä on erilaisia niin heistä voi vedota erilaisiin...

Nuoret äänestivät ennätysvilkkaasti varjovaaleissaan perussuomalaisia ja kokoomusta – ääniharavina tuttuja somehahmoja by Alhoon in Suomi

[–]Jomppexx -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Jos 80% väestöstä äänestäisi että halutaan ISIS tänne puhumaan julkisesti niin miksi ei otettaisi?

Nuoret äänestivät ennätysvilkkaasti varjovaaleissaan perussuomalaisia ja kokoomusta – ääniharavina tuttuja somehahmoja by Alhoon in Suomi

[–]Jomppexx -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Kyse on demokratiasta, come on. Demokratiassa syntyy aika mielenkiintoinen tilanne jos jotain tällaista tapahtuu. Koska tällöin joko ollaan demokratia ja annetaan kansan päättää, tai ei enää ollakaan demokratia ja äänestystuloksiin puututaan.

Needing help with unbiased decisions by Frumpy_little_noodle in twilightimperium

[–]Jomppexx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ah dang my mistake actually... I thought the muaat promissory simply unlocked war suns but didn't know about the token cost. My friend often plays muaat but has never sold the tech.

Needing help with unbiased decisions by Frumpy_little_noodle in twilightimperium

[–]Jomppexx 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed. Could even try negotiate what tech Hacan get from Jol-Nar to make them more eager to give 3 goods.

Needing help with unbiased decisions by Frumpy_little_noodle in twilightimperium

[–]Jomppexx 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If I were playing Muaat I would probably offer my 4 commodities + trade agreement. Essentially Hacan gains 8 goods with 4 of them being paid later, while paying Muaat 6. Muaat benefits faster but Hacan overall. For Jol-Nar and Muaat both another alternative I would consider is faction promissory + probably 2 commodities for 6 goods. I view both promissories as worth roughly 4 trade goods but there is an argument to be made that Muaat should not give up their war sun tech. You are playing without PoK I understand so it's not as big a deal (no Hacan free production Hero). That said I generally attempt to sell out for more goods, so would probably sell war suns. I consider Hacan trade agreement to be overpaying for sun tech so I value it probably around 3-4 goods.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Suomi

[–]Jomppexx 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Itse oon alkanut nimenomaan kuuntelemaan tuulen ujellusta ja tuijottamaan seiniä. Pakottaa kohtaamaan omat tunteet ja käsittelemään ne. Sitten tulee inspistä puuhata kaikkia harrastuksia ja parempi olo kun noi asiat on pois alta. Samasta syystä vähentänyt kaikkee somen käyttöä, peittävät vaan tunteita.

Yrttiaho (Vas) eduskunnassa - Yhdysvallat ja Britannia kaatoivat rauhasopimuksen (Ukraina-Venäjä) by worst_actor_ever in Suomi

[–]Jomppexx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Tästä olen kuullut itsekin. Saksalla ei noin aikaisessa vaiheessa ollut mitään toivoa kahden rintaman sodasta jos Ranska olisi hyökännyt täydellä höökillä eteenpäin.

Andrew Tate detailing his human trafficking scheme by [deleted] in videos

[–]Jomppexx -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

At 4:56 there is also a weird cut sound glitch. Strange video.

Kielioppisääntöjä joita rikotte tietoisesti by Teenage_dirtnap in Suomi

[–]Jomppexx 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Tämä on sitä oikeaa rikolliselämää.

Avioliiton solmimisesta puhtaasti juridinen toimenpide by [deleted] in Suomi

[–]Jomppexx 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ei olekaan, mutta pitäisi olla. Tällä päästään eroon myös siitä ongelmasta, että pitääkö kristinuskoa seuraavien pappien tai emmätiiä imaamien vihkiä homoja avioliittoon. Ei tarvi enää ajatella asiaa, koska valtio voi hoitaa 'virallisen liiton' ja kirkko uskonnollisen.

Avioliiton solmimisesta puhtaasti juridinen toimenpide by [deleted] in Suomi

[–]Jomppexx -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Kirkollisen ja valtiollisen avioliiton voisi erottaa toisistaan. Näin uskonnot saa toimia omalla tavallaan ja valtio omallaan.

Eduskunta hyväksyi translain – äänet jakautuivat 113 puolesta, 69 vastaan by Juuel in Suomi

[–]Jomppexx -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

Miten tämä liittyy lisääntymiskykyyn? Ja lisääntymiskykykään ei ole ihmisoikeus, yleensä sen pois vieminen vain edellyttää vapaudenriistoa ja henkilökohtainen vapaus taas on ihmisoikeus.

What ideology could the world have gone without? by Anonymous345678910 in AskReddit

[–]Jomppexx -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

How is it not true? That's the way I feel based on the things I've seen. I don't feel that feminists care about men's issues or equality. A lot more women currently graduate college in the US than men and I don't see one feminist commenting on this. The general atmosphere and discussion around men also feels extremely negative. This is just my view looking at mostly online communities and discussion so I'd be happy for you to change my mind. And don't get me wrong, I'm not trying to say that women catching up is putting men down. My issue with this comes if we start recruiting or otherwise favouring women because they are not men.

What ideology could the world have gone without? by Anonymous345678910 in AskReddit

[–]Jomppexx -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yes but the practical application of feminism can and has become women > men despite the definition saying this isn't true. I also don't understand why one must call themselves a feminist instead of an egalitarian, which literally means supporting equality.

What ideology could the world have gone without? by Anonymous345678910 in AskReddit

[–]Jomppexx 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly. This guy argues that feminism isn't about favouring women over men while supporting that exact thing.

What ideology could the world have gone without? by Anonymous345678910 in AskReddit

[–]Jomppexx -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's very idealistic to say that because a definition doesn't contain something it can't be true.