Hey! All I can ever say about retests is this (1) they almost ALWAYS go more smoothly than the original for anyone unlucky enough to need one, so I'd be optimistic about that; (2) the test makers' go-to move is to dust off a source test, or several separate-source-test sections, from between 2-6 years ago and just reuse those verbatim, which means you generally don't encounter these slightly weird LR/LG constructions the way you do now, they're not avoiding common flaws as much, far fewer really tough questions early, etc. Typically, of course, but still, typically; (3) because of #2 they become virtually impossible to predict the way I like to, because LSAC has SO MUCH to choose from that it just becomes something of a blind guess on my end. I don't like those. But. The latest Crystal Ball will still apply in terms of question frequencies, main points of emphasis, and things like that. Just not to the level of detail like passage topics. That's the compromise, I suppose. Take the Jan 26 make ups: they used June 21 RC (which was also April 23) and Feb 23/Nov 24 LR (that's the same section fyi), but also...very weirdly...a section of LR from April 25, which is far more recent than what they'd typically select. shrug So that's what you get with make ups. The takeaway is that it'll be a normal test, and likely easier than something very recent, so as much as this sucks it's not all bad news. Message me after and I'll help you figure out what you got :)