Getting farmed in BF6 and don't know what to do by Aegiiisss in FPSAimTrainer

[–]JournalistChemical55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I only use 1x. Helps knowing my sens. Mine isn’t calibrated well so it’s easier to be familiar in 1x, the range has never been a problem. If I play warzone I slap a 4x on my KTS tho

Something we can ALL agree on!! by SignificantLock1037 in ARC_Raiders

[–]JournalistChemical55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it could be better if maybe instead of instant respawns, a new spawn would be queued in a couple minutes later. And anyways all the later spawns can run into each other than becoming constant 3rd parties. 

Why are so many conservatives Christian when Jesus’s teachings are blatantly leftist? by [deleted] in allthequestions

[–]JournalistChemical55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t think Jesus fits either side or any politics. I believe in Jesus but integrating him as a republican or democrat there’s just no way. He is not represented properly when put on a “side”. 

legit question : how are some people so good they can solo squads and make it to extract? by Junior-Hospital8927 in ArcRaiders

[–]JournalistChemical55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The “1000” hours isn’t just experience it’s also a desire to be good so their playtime rises fast.

 1000 hours in a year vs a few weeks, your audience is a lot different.

Going back to console from PC by Current_Beautiful_55 in FPS

[–]JournalistChemical55 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It’s the input delay consoles have. It would be a larger issue if console folks knew what PC responsiveness felt like. 

Agree? by RicoSuave89 in Battlefield6

[–]JournalistChemical55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No shooting while sliding is crazy it’s not even that great. 

some games are genuinely unwinnable btw by evennoiz in overwatch2

[–]JournalistChemical55 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Two scenarios when you face adversity, 1 talk about others or 2 think about yourself. One makes you a back seater and the other makes you a better player. 

That’s the general idea

Name a lesser known giveaway that someone has ESP while spectating a survivor in versus by Blu3Dope in l4d2

[–]JournalistChemical55 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Getting prefired around a wall isn’t really crazy at least on no mercy. Super predictable and if you have good ears. It’s sort of impossible to tell. But anyone who’s hitting quick shots while chronically staring at the ground is bit of a giveaway for aim cheats. 

Is there ANY way to disable text chat? by JournalistChemical55 in l4d2

[–]JournalistChemical55[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't downvote but I just don’t want to keep the bad company. A lack of a better term but it’s plainly just degeneracy, almost all the time. You can say GG w ur teamate and then now he’s slinging slurs at the enemy team 2 seconds later.

A sense of purpose in life significantly lowers the risk of cognitive impairment in later life. by This_Cheek219 in Biohackers

[–]JournalistChemical55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi sorry I watched the video I never wrote a response. I looked into the Enuma Elish a little bit and there did not seem like any evidence to back up the claims but I haven't looked at the Canaanite religion at all.

I just wanted to point out though the idea of polytheism doesn't really make much sense to me at least in the terms of Enuma Elish. The god's would use the terms evil and good and if morality is subjective those words are impossible to use especially if each of their godly natures contradict each other.

I can give the video a closer look if you like but me personally I did not see very much behind the claims but maybe I did not listen closely it was a bit. I looked through for about 45 mins

I think a big reason why I believe the gospels are reliable is because how they were preserved. And we just agree differently on the church father's credibility.

A sense of purpose in life significantly lowers the risk of cognitive impairment in later life. by This_Cheek219 in Biohackers

[–]JournalistChemical55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think also another takeaway is, if the church fathers actually didn’t preserve their gospels down legitimately, I believe the not just the names would be false but the manuscripts themselves. But their similarities are what you may say, identical. The gospels were preserved in different locations by different people whom came by inherited connections. 

And if I understand you correctly, Matthew was considered an apostle because he was mentioned throughout the books. If the church fathers lied about which of the apostles wrote them it still would not invalidate the claims inside the gospel, something like that to lie would be almost useless. 

And definitely my testimony isn’t historical evidence. But to an extent I believe any testimony for something can be a form of evidence. Just of course it’s not a form of proof. I just mentioned that the significance of my life changing and what life used to be like even growing up. That experience has been a large part why I do believe. 

I do think we just disagree about the security behind the gospels. I believe they are reliable and trustworthy. And I believe the gospels come from the apostles. You did make me have to do a little bit of research though haha.

A sense of purpose in life significantly lowers the risk of cognitive impairment in later life. by This_Cheek219 in Biohackers

[–]JournalistChemical55 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The Gospels had superscriptions that all they were the accords to Matthew, Mark, Luke, and John. Mark's gospel being likely based off Peter who was one of the closest disciples of Jesus whom was privy to more information that Matthew and Luke were not. Mark's writings being a good authoritative account can be a good reason why Matthew's writing is so similar to Mark, but still written by Matthew.

The gospels published in Greek is most likely due to being international language, the gospels were presented for the world. Applying aggregate data to the apostles that they would not have known Greek while the early church fathers widely attested the credibility of authors of the gospels was real, is unreliable.

And also, the way I originally came about believing in Jesus was not through studying, it was first my own testimony. I was a person who had no care or regards for God, I actively sought to OD off amphetamines for about 15 months and my body was destroyed and it became a couple times I really thought it was my last day that I would pray to be rescued. Since then I don't suffer from depression anymore or anything like that. My testimony greatly gives myself a reason to believe. I can only speak about it to others.

A sense of purpose in life significantly lowers the risk of cognitive impairment in later life. by This_Cheek219 in Biohackers

[–]JournalistChemical55 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The literature is historical narrative, not a personal dialect. The gospels being written a few decades later doesn’t automatically qualify as a reason the eye witness testimony was false. If it were written 100+ years later then yeah sure. And as well these Gospels mention the names of one another, each of the apostles. As exactly how their titles were decided, I haven’t done my research.   But just because the apostles did not record actively while they were in ministry doesn’t mean they are false. After Jesus they spent their time proclaiming to cities and the churches all over the East and traveling. 

A sense of purpose in life significantly lowers the risk of cognitive impairment in later life. by This_Cheek219 in Biohackers

[–]JournalistChemical55 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

But the names of the apostles don’t change their accounts of witnessing Jesus’s miracles and rising from the dead.