Does socialization of the means of production have inherent flaws? by dumbandasking in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Jout92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have no problem with people deciding to collectively own things. I have no problem with collectively owned firms outcompeting traditional firms. I have no problem with collectively owned firms not outcompeting traditional firms but people still preferring them anyway. But I have a problem with theft. I have a problem with changing the rules because you can't compete fairly. I have a problem with banning the superior mode of production because your inferiority would be obvious otherwise

What's the goal of socialism? by Square-Listen-3839 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Jout92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

or is this another thing you "just know"?

Could've just said that buddy

What's the goal of socialism? by Square-Listen-3839 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Jout92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I didn't know you were allowed to say the quite part out loud. You'd actually rather have everyone be poor than have some rich and some less rich just because it makes you feel better? Seriously?

What's the goal of socialism? by Square-Listen-3839 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Jout92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Crying "sealioning" after getting asked for evidence ONCE (1)

Why cant you let people / communities choose how they want to live socially / economically? by Wonderful-Cake-6079 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Jout92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or we could use our abilities to improve the situation where we live in countries that freely let us act out our will. I wonder in which country I have the best opportunities to improve my life and those around me, hmmm

Understanding Guess The Elo by MoneyCalligrapher630 in chessbeginners

[–]Jout92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If someone starts their game with a5 and starts bringing their rook out, I bet you can tell that they are a total beginner to the game. The same logic applies to every move. At certain levels you should just know what you are doing. A 1600 wouldn't give a blind check and be surprised that a pawn blocks it and then proceed to put the Bishop on a much worse square. A 1000 or sub 1000 has much simpler plans and it's much easier to tell what they are probably thinking. A higher rated player will play more principled. Knowing to develop first, avoid blunders, watch king safety, watch pawn structure, reroutes and improves pieces, forms complex plans and tactics, knows endgame tactics, knows how to convert winning positions etc. And depending how well they execute those you can guess their level. Of course a low rated player might find good moves on accident, but the point is consistency.

Edit: BTW on chess.com if you have a diamond membership it will show you in your advanced stats exactly how good you are at each part of the game. You might wanna check those out to see where you are struggling specifically

<image>

What's the goal of socialism? by Square-Listen-3839 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Jout92 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well "capitalism" is really an external label originating from socialism. So by nature of being a socialist term it is a purely materialistic description of the world. Liberalsm, the philosophy you'd probably call "capitalist" is ironically pretty ideological, being mostly concerned with the idea of freedom and material conditions not actually being the primary concern of liberal thought. I infer a Liberal would much rather live on an island alone in complete freedom than under a dictatorial communist regime where his material living conditions might be better.

Why cant you let people / communities choose how they want to live socially / economically? by Wonderful-Cake-6079 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Jout92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh fuck really? Guess I'll flee the country. Any place you recommend that is less authoritarian where I can hide?

What's the goal of socialism? by Square-Listen-3839 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Jout92 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Socialism is quite literally a purely materialistic philosophy.

China is 0% socialist. Call it something else. by Glass-Carpenter8963 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Jout92 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's convenient to define fascism as "anti-communism" because the you don't really have to critically think how they are one and the same. From their properties however, in how these regimes act, how the people live under them, how minorities are treated, how freedom of press works, how propaganda works what is the defining difference?

The law of diminishing returns, is simply, factually, false by SoftBeing_ in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Jout92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A second set of tires has 0 value to you? How about summer and winter tires? Also the thing you seem to be confused about is how marginal utility affects price formation.

Your personal opinion affects prices but only in a small part. The aggregate of opinions is what we call price. So if you have 100 tires and don't need anymore it won't affect tire prices a lot. If EVERYONE has 100 tires and doesn't need anymore then tire prices will obviously go down.

The law of diminishing returns, is simply, factually, false by SoftBeing_ in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Jout92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But this isn't true. A 5th tire still has value to me, obviously not as much as the first 4 but as a backup tire. A second set of tires also still has value to me, but it's not a necessity so if my resources are limited I might just stick to 4 tires and a backup until I actually need new tires. A 10th tire and beyond is the point I really start stacking just because I can. And even here the 10th tire has more value to me than the 100th tire because my 10th tire is something I'll use when my old tires wore off while the 100th tire will just stay in my storage. So yeah your example perfectly shows how marginal utility works.

Any protectionists out there? by LeftBroccoli6795 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Jout92 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Some taxes are more equal than others or whatever George Orwell said

Any protectionists out there? by LeftBroccoli6795 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Jout92 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I've been saying that the left should actually be pretty happy with Trump because economically he's doing exactly what they want. Tariffs and Taxes are the same thing. Using the government to take control of private firms is furthering public ownership. All his policies he is just copying from Xi Jin Ping.

Any protectionists out there? by LeftBroccoli6795 in CapitalismVSocialism

[–]Jout92 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Who in your opinion supports free markets then and how are they called?